The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics Between Virtual Synchronous Generator and Droop Control in Inverter-Based Distributed Generators
Abstract
In recent researches on inverter-based distributed generators, disadvantages of traditional grid-connected current control, such as no grid-forming ability and lack of inertia, have been pointed out. As a result, novel control methods like droop control and virtual synchronous generator (VSG) have been proposed. In both methods, droop characteristics are used to control active and reactive power, and the only difference between them is that VSG has virtual inertia with the emulation of swing equation, whereas droop control has no inertia. In this paper, dynamic characteristics of both control methods are studied, in both stand-alone mode and synchronous-generator-connected mode, to understand the differences caused by swing equation. Small-signal models are built to compare transient responses of frequency during a small loading transition, and state-space models are built to analyze oscillation of output active power. Effects of delays in both controls are also studied, and an inertial droop control method is proposed based on the comparison. The results are verified by simulations and experiments. It is suggested that VSG control and proposed inertial droop control inherits the advantages of droop control, and in addition, provides inertia support for the system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guerrero, J. M., Vasquez, J. C., Matas, J., de Vicuna, L. G., & Castilla, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2010.2066534 · Cited by 5,075
Cited by
Improvement of Frequency Regulation in VSG-Based AC Microgrid Via Adaptive Virtual Inertia
Hou, X., Sun, Y., Zhang, X., Lu, J., Wang, P., & Guerrero, J. M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2019.2923734 · Cited by 367
Robust Frequency Control of Microgrids Using an Extended Virtual Synchronous Generator
Fathi, A., Shafiee, Q., & Bevrani, H. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2018.2850880 · Cited by 298
Charging Infrastructure and Grid Integration for Electromobility
Rivera, S., Goetz, S. M., Kouro, S., Lehn, P. W., Pathmanathan, M., Bauer, P., & Mastromauro, R. A. (2023) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2022.3216362 · Cited by 233
Seo, G.-S., Colombino, M., Subotic, I., Johnson, B., Gros, D., & Dorfler, F. (2019) · 2019 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC) · doi:10.1109/apec.2019.8722028 · Cited by 182
Gerini, F., Zuo, Y., Gupta, R., Zecchino, A., Yuan, Z., Vagnoni, E., Cherkaoui, R., & Paolone, M. (2022) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108567 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Miura, Y., & Ise, T.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3600-3611
- ISSN
- 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0107
- OpenAlex
- W2207798671
- Cited by
- 1,243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 57.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics Between Virtual Synchronous Generator and Droop Control in Inverter-Based Distributed Generators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpel.2015.2465852
- The paper
- Liu, J., Miura, Y., & Ise, T. (2016). Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics Between Virtual Synchronous Generator and Droop Control in Inverter-Based Distributed Generators. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2015.2465852
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
