The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of Power System Flexibility
Open accessAbstract
As the penetration of variable renewable generation increases in power systems worldwide, planning for the effects of variability will become more important. Traditional capacity adequacy planning techniques have been supplemented with integration studies, which have been carried out in power systems with high targets for renewable generation. These have highlighted the increased variability that a system may experience in the future. As system generation planning techniques evolve with the challenge of integrating variable generation, the flexibility of a system to manage periods of high variability needs to be assessed. The insufficient ramping resource expectation (IRRE) metric is proposed to measure power system flexibility for use in long-term planning, and is derived from traditional generation adequacy metrics. Compared to existing generation adequacy metrics, flexibility assessment is more data intensive. A flexibility metric can identify the time intervals over which a system is most likely to face a shortage of flexible resources, and can measure the relative impact of changing operational policies and the addition of flexible resources. The flexibility of a test system with increasing penetrations of variable generation is assessed. The results highlight the time horizons of increased and decreased risk associated with the integration of VG.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Cited by
Challenges of renewable energy penetration on power system flexibility: A survey
Impram, S., Varbak Nese, S., & Oral, B. (2020) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2020.100539 · Cited by 939
Flexibility in future power systems with high renewable penetration: A review
Alizadeh, M. I., Parsa Moghaddam, M., Amjady, N., Siano, P., & Sheikh-El-Eslami, M. K. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.200 · Cited by 389
Tang, H., Wang, S., & Li, H. (2021) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.119598 · Cited by 259
Lu, Z., Li, H., & Qiao, Y. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2018.2810091 · Cited by 154
Primary Frequency Response in Capacity Expansion with Energy Storage
Carrion, M., Dvorkin, Y., & Pandzic, H. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2735807 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Lannoye, E., Flynn, D., & O'Malley, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 922-931
- ISSN
- 0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0679
- OpenAlex
- W2155297377
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Power System Flexibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpwrs.2011.2177280
- The paper
- Lannoye, E., Flynn, D., & O'Malley, M. (2012). Evaluation of Power System Flexibility. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2011.2177280
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.