Cited by 103Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Visual Navigation Using Heterogeneous Landmarks and Unsupervised Geometric Constraints

Lu, Yan, Song, Dezhen·2015·IEEE Transactions on Robotics

Abstract

We present a heterogeneous landmark-based visual navigation approach for a monocular mobile robot. We utilize heterogeneous visual features, such as points, line segments, lines, planes, and vanishing points, and their inner geometric constraints managed by a novel multilayer feature graph (MFG). Our method extends the local bundle adjustment-based visual simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) framework by explicitly exploiting the heterogeneous features and their inner geometric relationships in an unsupervised manner. As the result, our heterogeneous landmark-based visual navigation algorithm takes a video stream as input, initializes and iteratively updates MFG based on extracted key frames, and refines robot localization and MFG landmarks through the process. We present pseudocode for the algorithm and analyze its complexity. We have evaluated our method and compared it with state-of-the-art point landmark-based visual SLAM methods using multiple indoor and outdoor datasets. In particular, on the KITTI dataset, our method reduces the translational error by 52.5% under urban sequences where rectilinear structures dominate the scene.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tro.2015.2424032

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, Y., & Song, D.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
Published
2015-06
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
736-749
ISSN
  • 1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0468
OpenAlex
W645436802
Cited by
103
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 3
FWCI
18.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Robotics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (IIS-1318638, NRI-1426752)
  • TxDot (0-6869)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
visual navigation, visual SLAM, bundle adjustment, vanishing points, robot localization, key frame extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review