Cited by 46Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

A review of research on slam technology based on the fusion of lidar and vision

Open access
Chen, Peng, Zhao, Xinyu, Zeng, Lina, Liu, Luxinyu, Liu, Shengjie, Sun, Li, Li, Zaijin, Chen, Hao +6 more·2025·Sensors

Abstract

In recent years, simultaneous localization and mapping with the fusion of LiDAR and vision fusion has gained extensive attention in the field of autonomous navigation and environment sensing. However, its limitations in feature-scarce (low-texture, repetitive structure) environmental scenarios and dynamic environments have prompted researchers to investigate the use of combining LiDAR with other sensors, particularly the effective fusion with vision sensors. This technique has proven to be highly effective in handling a variety of situations by fusing deep learning with adaptive algorithms. LiDAR excels in complex environments, with its ability to acquire high-precision 3D spatial information, especially when dealing with complex and dynamic environments with high reliability. This paper analyzes the research status, including the main research results and findings, of the early single-sensor SLAM technology and the current stage of LiDAR and vision fusion SLAM. Specific solutions for current problems (complexity of data fusion, computational burden and real-time performance, multi-scenario data processing, etc.) are examined by categorizing and summarizing the body of the extant literature and, at the same time, discussing the trends and limitations of the current research by categorizing and summarizing the existing literature, as well as looks forward to the future research directions, including multi-sensor fusion, optimization of algorithms, improvement of real-time performance, and expansion of application scenarios. This review aims to provide guidelines and insights for the development of SLAM technology for LiDAR and vision fusion, with a view to providing a reference for further SLAM technology research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s25051447

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relying on traditional single-modal approaches such as RGB images can encounter limitations in complex scenarios such as occlusion, lighting variations, and multi-object ambiguities.

    “Relying on traditional single-modal approaches (e.g., solely using RGB images) can encounter various limitations in complex scenarios, such as occlusion, lighting variations, and multi-object ambiguities [32,33,34].”

    From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says low light and moving objects can impair visual SLAM, and §5.1 (page unavailable) identifies occlusion and lighting changes as problems for SLAM sensor data. The paper does not specifically identify multi-object ambiguity as a limitation of RGB-only approaches; its discussion is about visual SLAM and SLAM systems more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Liang T. Xie H. Yu K. Xia Z. Lin Z. Wang Y. Wang B. Tang Z. BEVFusion: A Simple and Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion Framework arXiv 2019 10.13140/RG.2.2.31757.20966/1 2205.13790 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, P., Zhao, X., Zeng, L., Liu, L., Liu, S., Sun, L., Li, Z., Chen, H., Liu, G., Qiao, Z., Qu, Y., Xu, D., Li, L., & Li, L.
Affiliations
  • Hainan Normal University (CN)
  • College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China
Corresponding author
Li, Lin
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-02-27
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
1447
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408000594
Cited by
46
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 12
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Finance Science and Technology Project of Hainan province (GHYF2025030, ZDYF2025GXJS007, 123MS035, 62174046, 12164016, 62274048, 62464006, 202411658025, 202411658027, 202311658002X, S202411658031)
  • Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (GHYF2025030, ZDYF2025GXJS007, 123MS035, 62174046, 12164016, 62274048, 62464006, 202411658025, 202411658027, 202311658002X, S202411658031)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (GHYF2025030, ZDYF2025GXJS007, 123MS035, 62174046, 12164016, 62274048, 62464006, 202411658025, 202411658027, 202311658002X, S202411658031)
  • Open Fund for Innovation Training Program of College Students of Hainan Normal University (GHYF2025030, ZDYF2025GXJS007, 123MS035, 62174046, 12164016, 62274048, 62464006, 202411658025, 202411658027, 202311658002X, S202411658031)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
SLAM, LiDAR, multi-sensor fusion, autonomous navigation, dynamic environments, real-time performance, computational load, 3D sensing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review