Cited by 6,898Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageAdvanced Vision and Imaging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ORB-SLAM2: An Open-Source SLAM System for Monocular, Stereo, and RGB-D Cameras

Open access
Mur-Artal, Raul, Tardos, Juan D.·2017·IEEE Transactions on Robotics

Abstract

We present ORB-SLAM2, a complete simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) system for monocular, stereo and RGB-D cameras, including map reuse, loop closing, and relocalization capabilities. The system works in real time on standard central processing units in a wide variety of environments from small hand-held indoors sequences, to drones flying in industrial environments and cars driving around a city. Our back-end, based on bundle adjustment with monocular and stereo observations, allows for accurate trajectory estimation with metric scale. Our system includes a lightweight localization mode that leverages visual odometry tracks for unmapped regions and matches with map points that allow for zero-drift localization. The evaluation on 29 popular public sequences shows that our method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, being in most cases the most accurate SLAM solution. We publish the source code, not only for the benefit of the SLAM community, but with the aim of being an out-of-the-box SLAM solution for researchers in other fields.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tro.2017.2705103

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF

    Rublee, E., Rabaud, V., Konolige, K., & Bradski, G. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126544 · Cited by 11,037 · cited 1×

    “The system uses the same ORB features [17] for tracking, mapping, and place recognition tasks.”
    Method
  • Vision meets robotics: The KITTI dataset

    Geiger, A., Lenz, P., Stiller, C., & Urtasun, R. (2013) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913491297 · Cited by 9,913 · cited 3×

    “We use two different metrics, the absolute translation root-mean-square error (RMSE) tabs proposed in [3], and the average relative translation trel and rotation rrel errors proposed in [2].”
    BackgroundMethod
  • ORB-SLAM: A Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM System

    Mur-Artal, R., Montiel, J. M. M., & Tardos, J. D. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2015.2463671 · Cited by 6,778 · cited 7×

    “Left: Monocular ORB-SLAM [1], right: ORB-SLAM2 (stereo).”
    BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citation
  • A benchmark for the evaluation of RGB-D SLAM systems

    Sturm, J., Engelhard, N., Endres, F., Burgard, W., & Cremers, D. (2012) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2012.6385773 · Cited by 4,230 · cited 4×

    “The RGB-D case shows the keyframe poses estimated in sequence fr1_room from the TUM RGB-D Dataset [3], and a dense pointcloud, rendered by backprojecting sensor depth maps from the estimated keyframe poses.”
    MethodInfluential
  • KinectFusion: Real-time dense surface mapping and tracking

    Newcombe, R. A., Fitzgibbon, A., Izadi, S., Hilliges, O., Molyneaux, D., Kim, D., Davison, A. J., Kohi, P., Shotton, J., & Hodges, S. (2011) · 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality · doi:10.1109/ismar.2011.6092378 · Cited by 4,008 · cited 2×

    “Note that our SLAM does not perform any fusion like KinectFusion [4] or similar, but the good definition indicates the accuracy of the keyframe poses.”
    Background
  • The EuRoC micro aerial vehicle datasets

    Burri, M., Nikolic, J., Gohl, P., Schneider, T., Rehder, J., Omari, S., Achtelik, M., & Siegwart, R. (2016) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364915620033 · Cited by 2,086 · cited 1×

    “The recent EuRoC dataset [21] contains 11 stereo sequences recorded from a microaerial vehicle (MAV) flying around two different rooms and a large industrial environment.”
    Background
  • Bags of Binary Words for Fast Place Recognition in Image Sequences

    Gálvez‐López, D., & Tardós, J. D. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2012.2197158 · Cited by 1,890 · cited 2×

    “The system has embedded a Place Recognition module based on DBoW2 [16] for relocalization, in case of tracking failure (e.g. an occlusion) or for reinitialization in an already mapped scene, and for loop detection.”
  • Dense visual SLAM for RGB-D cameras

    Kerl, C., Sturm, J., & Cremers, D. (2013) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2013.6696650 · Cited by 941 · cited 5×

    “In Table III we compare our accuracy to the following state-of-the-art methods: ElasticFusion [15], Kintinuous [12], DVO-SLAM [14] and RGB-D SLAM [13].”
    MethodInfluential
  • 3-D Mapping With an RGB-D Camera

    Endres, F., Hess, J., Sturm, J., Cremers, D., & Burgard, W. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2013.2279412 · Cited by 821 · cited 5×

    “In Table III we compare our accuracy to the following state-of-the-art methods: ElasticFusion [15], Kintinuous [12], DVO-SLAM [14] and RGB-D SLAM [13].”
    MethodInfluential
  • Visual-Inertial Monocular SLAM With Map Reuse

    Mur-Artal, R., & Tardós, J. D. (2017) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2017.2653359 · Cited by 790 · cited 1×

    “As shown in [22], this sequence can be processed using IMU information.”
    MethodSelf-citation

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 21 references

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1177/0278364914551008 · DOI
  2. kuemmerle, 0, g2o: A general framework for graph optimization, Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom, 3607

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mur-Artal, R., & Tardos, J. D.
Affiliations
Instituto de Investigación en Ingeniería de Aragón (ES)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
Published
2017-10
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
1255-1262
ISSN
  • 1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0468
OpenAlex
W2535547924
Cited by
6,898
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 521 · 2025: 851 · 2024: 944 · 2023: 962 · 2022: 910 · 2021: 870 · 2020: 754 · 2019: 636 · 2018: 360 · 2017: 90
FWCI
463.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Spanish government (DPI2015-67275)
  • Aragón regional government (DGA T04-FSE)
  • Ministerio de Educación Scholarship (FPU13/04175)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
ORB-SLAM2, SLAM, monocular SLAM, stereo SLAM, RGB-D SLAM, loop closure, relocalization, bundle adjustment, visual odometry, trajectory estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review