The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal Scheduling for Charging and Discharging of Electric Vehicles
Abstract
The vehicle electrification will have a significant impact on the power grid due to the increase in electricity consumption. It is important to perform intelligent scheduling for charging and discharging of electric vehicles (EVs). However, there are two major challenges in the scheduling problem. First, it is challenging to find the globally optimal scheduling solution which can minimize the total cost. Second, it is difficult to find a distributed scheduling scheme which can handle a large population and the random arrivals of the EVs. In this paper, we propose a globally optimal scheduling scheme and a locally optimal scheduling scheme for EV charging and discharging. We first formulate a global scheduling optimization problem, in which the charging powers are optimized to minimize the total cost of all EVs which perform charging and discharging during the day. The globally optimal solution provides the globally minimal total cost. However, the globally optimal scheduling scheme is impractical since it requires the information on the future base loads and the arrival times and the charging periods of the EVs that will arrive in the future time of the day. To develop a practical scheduling scheme, we then formulate a local scheduling optimization problem, which aims to minimize the total cost of the EVs in the current ongoing EV set in the local group. The locally optimal scheduling scheme is not only scalable to a large EV population but also resilient to the dynamic EV arrivals. Through simulations, we demonstrate that the locally optimal scheduling scheme can achieve a close performance compared to the globally optimal scheduling scheme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Optimal Charging Strategies for Unidirectional Vehicle-to-Grid
Sortomme, E., & El-Sharkawi, M. A. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2010.2090910 · Cited by 782
Cited by
Das, H. S., Rahman, M. M., Li, S., & Tan, C. W. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109618 · Cited by 1,140
Habib, S., Kamran, M., & Rashid, U. (2015) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.020 · Cited by 556
Hybrid Optimization for Economic Deployment of ESS in PV-Integrated EV Charging Stations
Chaudhari, K., Ukil, A., Kumar, K. N., Manandhar, U., & Kollimalla, S. K. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2017.2713481 · Cited by 384
Bonges, H. A., & Lusk, A. C. (2016) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.09.011 · Cited by 315
A Survey of Algorithms for Distributed Charging Control of Electric Vehicles in Smart Grid
Nimalsiri, N. I., Mediwaththe, C. P., Ratnam, E. L., Shaw, M., Smith, D. B., & Halgamuge, S. K. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2019.2943620 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- He, Y., Venkatesh, B., & Guan, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1095-1105
- ISSN
- 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-3061
- OpenAlex
- W2051431619
- Cited by
- 812
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Scheduling for Charging and Discharging of Electric Vehicles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsg.2011.2173507
- The paper
- He, Y., Venkatesh, B., & Guan, L. (2012). Optimal Scheduling for Charging and Discharging of Electric Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2011.2173507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.