Cited by 37Teleoperation and Haptic SystemsVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsSurgical Simulation and Training

Investigating Human Performance in a Virtual Reality Haptic Simulator as Influenced by Fidelity and System Latency

Kaber, David B., Li, Yingjie, Clamann, Michael, Lee, Yuan-Shin·2012·IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans

Abstract

The objective of this study was to demonstrate the utility of an established model of human motor behavior for assessing the fidelity of a virtual reality (VR) and haptic-based simulation for fine motor task performance. This study was also to serve as a basis for formulating general performance-based simulator-design guidelines toward balancing perceived realism with simulator limitations, such as latency resulting from graphic and haptic renderings. A low-fidelity surgical simulator was developed as an example VR for study, and user performance was tested in a simplified tissue-cutting task using a virtual scalpel. The observed aspect of the simulation included a discrete-movement task under different system-lag conditions and settings of task difficulty. Results revealed user performance in the VR to conform with Fitts' law of motor behavior and for performance to degrade with increasing task difficulty and system time lag. In general, the findings of this work support predictions on human performance under various simulator-design conditions using an established model of motor-control behavior and formulation of human-performance-based simulator-design principles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsmca.2012.2201466

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the dialoging mode of HIC, delays and reliability of haptic data communication are paramount for safe communication, with a latency requirement of 0-50 ms.

    “In the dialoging mode, where the interaction is highly dynamic (e.g., therapist-patient interaction, where the therapist remotely operates a local robotic avatar to assist the local patient to perform rehabilitation exercises), delays and reliability of haptic data communication are paramount for safe communication (a latency requirement of 0-50 ms).”
  • For the observing mode of HIC, the latency requirement can be further extended to 0-200 ms.

    “For the observing mode, where interaction is static or quasi-static (e.g., teletraining system, where a trainee will be observing the performance of a remote trainer), the latency requirement can be further extended to 0-200 ms.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaber, D. B., Li, Y., Clamann, M., & Lee, Y.-S.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans
Published
2012-11
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
1562-1566
ISSN
  • 1083-4427 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2426
OpenAlex
W2034918745
Cited by
37
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
virtual reality, haptic simulation, simulation fidelity, system latency, Fitts' law, surgical simulation, tissue cutting, discrete movements, task difficulty, motor control models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review