The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human–Robot Interaction in Rescue Robotics
Abstract
Rescue robotics has been suggested by a recent DARPA/NSF study as an application domain for the research in human-robot integration (HRI). This paper provides a short tutorial on how robots are currently used in urban search and rescue (USAR) and discusses the HRI issues encountered over the past eight years. A domain theory of the search activity is formulated. The domain theory consists of two parts: 1) a workflow model identifying the major tasks, actions, and roles in robot-assisted search (e.g., a workflow model) and 2) a general information flow model of how data from the robot is fused by various team members into information and knowledge. The information flow model also captures the types of situation awareness needed by each agent in the rescue robot system. The article presents a synopsis of the major HRI issues in reducing the number of humans it takes to control a robot, maintaining performance with geographically distributed teams with intermittent communications, and encouraging acceptance within the existing social structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A survey of socially interactive robots
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00372-x · Cited by 3,162 · cited 1×
“Although human interactions with robots span almost every robotic endeavor [10], [11], HRI research has been conducted primarily in six application domains: entertainment [12], [13], [14], [15] (see Breazeal in this issue), museum docents [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], personal assistants [21], [22] (see Hüttenrauch, G…”
BackgroundBreazeal, C. (2002) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2376.001.0001 · Cited by 1,553
Casper, J., & Murphy, R. R. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2003.811794 · Cited by 938
Self-citationAviation Automation: The Search for A Human-centered Approach
Billings, C. E. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 845
Experiences with an interactive museum tour-guide robot
Burgard, W., Cremers, A. B., Fox, D., Hähnel, D., Lakemeyer, G., Schulz, D., Steiner, W., & Thrun, S. (1999) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(99)00070-3 · Cited by 818
Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results
Pineau, J., Montemerlo, M., Pollack, M., Roy, N., & Thrun, S. (2003) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00381-0 · Cited by 640
Probabilistic Algorithms and the Interactive Museum Tour-Guide Robot Minerva
Thrun, S., Beetz, M., Bennewitz, M., Burgard, W., Cremers, A. B., Dellaert, F., Fox, D., Hähnel, D., Rosenberg, C., Roy, N., et al. (2000) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/02783640022067922 · Cited by 516
Robonaut: NASA's space humanoid
Ambrose, R. O., Aldridge, H., Askew, R. S., Burridge, R. R., Bluethmann, W., Diftler, M., Lovchik, C., Magruder, D., & Rehnmark, F. (2000) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/5254.867913 · Cited by 394
Visual Information as a Conversational Resource in Collaborative Physical Tasks
Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., & Siegel, J. (2003) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1812_2 · Cited by 393
Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot
Severinson-Eklundh, K., Green, A., & Hüttenrauch, H. (2003) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00377-9 · Cited by 287
Cited by
Coordinated multi-robot exploration
Burgard, W., Moors, M., Stachniss, C., & Schneider, F. E. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2004.839232 · Cited by 1,177
Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration
Ajoudani, A., Zanchettin, A. M., Ivaldi, S., Albu-Schäffer, A., Kosuge, K., & Khatib, O. (2018) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-017-9677-2 · Cited by 832
Human Performance Issues and User Interface Design for Teleoperated Robots
Chen, J. Y. C., Haas, E. C., & Barnes, M. J. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2007.905819 · Cited by 646
HUMAN–ROBOT COLLABORATION: A SURVEY
BAUER, A., WOLLHERR, D., & BUSS, M. (2008) · International Journal of Humanoid Robotics · doi:10.1142/s0219843608001303 · Cited by 493
Murphy, R. R., Tadokoro, S., Nardi, D., Jacoff, A., Fiorini, P., Choset, H., & Erkmen, A. M. (2008) · Springer Handbook of Robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_51 · Cited by 363
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, R. R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews)
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 138-153
- ISSN
- 1094-6977 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142332594
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 36.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human–Robot Interaction in Rescue Robotics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmcc.2004.826267
- The paper
- Murphy, R. R. (2004). Human–Robot Interaction in Rescue Robotics. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcc.2004.826267
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
