Cited by 194Innovative Human-Technology InteractionData Visualization and AnalyticsPersonal Information Management and User Behavior

Understanding self-reflection: how people reflect on personal data through visual data exploration

Choe, Eun Kyoung, Lee, Bongshin, Zhu, Haining, Riche, Nathalie Henry, Baur, Dominikus·2017·Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare

Abstract

Rapid advancements in consumer technologies enable people to collect a wide range of personal data. With a proper means for people to ask questions and explore their data, longitudinal data feeds from multiple self-tracking tools pose great opportunities to foster deep self-reflection. However, most self-tracking tools lack support for self-reflection beyond providing simple feedback. Our overarching goal is to support self-trackers in reflecting on their data and gaining rich insights through visual data exploration. As a first step toward the goal, we built a web-based application called Visualized Self, and conducted an in-lab think-aloud study (N = 11) to examine how people reflect on their personal data and what types of insights they gain throughout the reflection. We discuss lessons learned from studying with Visualized Self, and suggest directions for designing visual data exploration tools for fostering self-reflection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3154862.3154881

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choe, E. K., Lee, B., Zhu, H., Riche, N. H., & Baur, D.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • Independent Researcher, Munich, Germany
Venue
Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-05-23
Pages
173-182
ISSN
2153-1633 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2610904967
Cited by
194
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 1
FWCI
9.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Keywords
self-reflection, self-tracking, personal data, visual data exploration, longitudinal data, data visualization tools, think-aloud study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review