Cited by 201Advanced DC-DC ConvertersMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies

Input-parallel output-series DC-DC boost converter with a wide input voltage range, for fuel cell vehicles

Open access
Wang, Ping, Zhou, Lei, Zhang, Yun, Li, Jing, Sumner, Mark·2017·IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Abstract

An input-parallel, output-series dc–dc Boost converter with a wide input voltage range is proposed in this paper. An interleaved structure is adopted in the input side of this converter to reduce input current ripple. Two capacitors are connected in series on the output side to achieve a high voltage gain. The operating principles and steady-state characteristics of the converter are presented and analyzed in this paper. A 400 V/1.6 kW prototype has been created which demonstrates that a wide range of voltage gain can be achieved by this converter and it is shown that the maximum efficiency of the converter is 96.62% and minimum efficiency is 94.14%. The experimental results validate the feasibility of the proposed topology and its suitability for fuel cell vehicles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tvt.2017.2688324

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cascaded configuration achieves a significantly higher voltage gain ratio under the same switching duty cycle compared to a single bidirectional buck-boost converter.

    “Although this cascaded configuration introduces additional components compared to a single bidirectional buck-boost converter, it achieves a significantly higher voltage gain ratio under the same switching duty cycle [60].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, P., Zhou, L., Zhang, Y., Li, J., & Sumner, M.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
Published
2017-09
Volume
66
Issue
9
Pages
7771-7781
ISSN
  • 0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9359
OpenAlex
W2602636896
Cited by
201
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 3
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • The National Key Research and Development Plan of China (2016YFB0900204)
  • Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology of Tianjin China (15JCQNJC03900)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51577130)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Keywords
boost converter, interleaved converter, wide input voltage range, high voltage gain, input current ripple reduction, fuel cell vehicles, converter efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review