Cited by 99Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

FuseSeg: LiDAR Point Cloud Segmentation Fusing Multi-Modal Data

Open access
Krispel, Georg, Opitz, Michael, Waltner, Georg, Possegger, Horst, Bischof, Horst·2020·2020 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)

Abstract

We introduce a simple yet effective fusion method of LiDAR and RGB data to segment LiDAR point clouds. Utilizing the dense native range representation of a LiDAR sensor and the setup calibration, we establish point correspondences between the two input modalities. Subsequently, we are able to warp and fuse the features from one domain into the other. Therefore, we can jointly exploit information from both data sources within one single network. To show the merit of our method, we extend SqueezeSeg, a point cloud segmentation network, with an RGB feature branch and fuse it into the original structure. Our extension called FuseSeg leads to an improvement of up to 18% IoU on the KITTI benchmark. In addition to the improved accuracy, we also achieve real-time performance at 50 fps, five times as fast as the recording speed of the KITTI LiDAR data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/wacv45572.2020.9093584

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Y. Li, R. Bu, M. Sun, W. Wu, X. Di, and B. Chen. PointCNN: Convolution On X-Transformed Points. In Proc. NeurIPS, 2018.
  2. C. R. Qi, L. Yi, H. Su, and L. J. Guibas. PointNet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. In Proc. NeurIPS, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krispel, G., Opitz, M., Waltner, G., Possegger, H., & Bischof, H.
Affiliations
Graz University of Technology (AT)
Venue
2020 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-03
Pages
1863-1872
ISSN
2472-6737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996158460
Cited by
99
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
LiDAR point cloud segmentation, multimodal fusion, RGB-LiDAR fusion, point matching, feature warping, KITTI dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review