The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two-phase authentication protocol for wireless sensor networks in distributed IoT applications
Abstract
In the centralized Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) architecture there exists a central entity, which acquires, processes and provides information from sensor nodes. Conversely, in the WSN applications in distributed Internet of Things (IoT) architecture, sensor nodes sense data, process, exchange information and perform collaboratively with other sensor nodes and endusers. In order to maintain the trustworthy connectivity and the accessibility of distributed IoT, it is important to establish secure links for end-to-end communication with proper authentication. The authors propose an implicit certificate-based authentication mechanism for WSNs in distributed IoT applications. The developed two-phase authentication protocol allows the sensor nodes and the end-users to authenticate each other and initiate secure connections. The proposed protocol supports the resource scarcity of the sensor nodes, heterogeneity and scalability of the network. The performance and security analysis justify that the proposed scheme is viable to deploy in resource constrained WSNs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
Shelby, Z., Hartke, K., & Bormann, C. (2014) · doi:10.17487/rfc7252 · Cited by 2,605 · cited 2×
“Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) is a mutual authentication scheme proposed for unreliable data transmission networks with User Datagram Protocol (UDP) links [11].”
BackgroundDTLS based security and two-way authentication for the Internet of Things
Kothmayr, T., Schmitt, C., Hu, W., Brünig, M., & Carle, G. (2013) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2013.05.003 · Cited by 391
Self-citation
Cited by
Internet of Things security: A survey
Alaba, F. A., Othman, M., Hashem, I. A. T., & Alotaibi, F. (2017) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2017.04.002 · Cited by 1,303
Mutual Authentication in IoT Systems Using Physical Unclonable Functions
Aman, M. N., Chua, K. C., & Sikdar, B. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2703088 · Cited by 316
Nikooghadam, M., Amintoosi, H., Islam, S. H., & Moghadam, M. F. (2021) · Journal of Systems Architecture · doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2020.101955 · Cited by 140
Lara, E., Aguilar, L., Sanchez, M. A., & García, J. A. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20020501 · Cited by 96
Bouzidi, M., Gupta, N., Cheikh, F. A., Shalaginov, A., & Derawi, M. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3207472 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Porambage, P., Schmitt, C., Kumar, P., Gurtov, A., & Ylianttila, M.
- Venue
- 2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-04
- Pages
- 2728-2733
- ISSN
- 1525-3511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167984898
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two-phase authentication protocol for wireless sensor networks in distributed IoT applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/wcnc.2014.6952860
- The paper
- Porambage, P., Schmitt, C., Kumar, P., Gurtov, A., & Ylianttila, M. (2014). Two-phase authentication protocol for wireless sensor networks in distributed IoT applications. 2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). https://doi.org/10.1109/wcnc.2014.6952860
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
