Cited by 78Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

Trust Bit: Reward-based intelligent vehicle commination using blockchain paper

Singh, Madhusudan, Kim, Shiho·2018·2018 IEEE 4th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT)

Abstract

The Intelligent vehicle is experiencing revolutionary growth in research and industry, but it still suffers from a lot of security vulnerabilities. Traditional security methods are incapable of providing secure IV, mainly in terms of communication. In IV communication, major issues are trust and data accuracy of received and broadcasted reliable data in the communication channel. Blockchain technology works for the cryptocurrency, Bitcoin which has been recently used to build trust and reliability in peer-to-peer networks with similar topologies to IV Communication world. IV to IV, communicate in a decentralized manner within communication networks. In this paper, we have proposed, Trust Bit (TB) for IV communication among IVs using Blockchain technology. Our proposed trust bit provides surety for each IVs broadcasted data, to be secure and reliable in every particular networks. Our Trust Bit is a symbol of trustworthiness of vehicles behavior, and vehicles legal and illegal action. Our proposal also includes a reward system, which can exchange some TB among IVs, during successful communication. For the data management of this trust bit, we have used blockchain technology in the vehicular cloud, which can store all Trust bit details and can be accessed by IV anywhere and anytime. Our proposal provides secure and reliable information. We evaluate our proposal with the help of IV communication on intersection use case which analyzes a variety of trustworthiness between IVs during communication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/wf-iot.2018.8355227

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, M., & Kim, S.
Affiliations
Yonsei University (KR)
Venue
2018 IEEE 4th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-02
Pages
62-67
OpenAlex
W2799542407
Cited by
78
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
FWCI
17.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
vehicular networks, blockchain, vehicular cloud computing, data reliability, decentralized communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review