3D domain swapping: As domains continue to swap
Open accessAbstract
Three‐dimensional (3D) domain swapping creates a bond between two or more protein molecules as they exchange their identical domains. Since the term '3D domain swapping' was first used to describe the dimeric structure of diphtheria toxin, the database of domain‐swapped proteins has greatly expanded. Analyses of the now about 40 structurally characterized cases of domain‐swapped proteins reveal that most swapped domains are at either the N or C terminus and that the swapped domains are diverse in their primary and secondary structures. In addition to tabulating domain‐swapped proteins, we describe in detail several examples of 3D domain swapping which show the swapping of more than one domain in a protein, the structural evidence for 3D domain swapping in amyloid proteins, and the flexibility of hinge loops. We also discuss the physiological relevance of 3D domain swapping and a possible mechanism for 3D domain swapping. The present state of knowledge leads us to suggest that 3D domain swapping can occur under appropriate conditions in any protein with an unconstrained terminus. As domains continue to swap, this review attempts not only a summary of the known domain‐swapped proteins, but also a framework for understanding future findings of 3D domain swapping.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review summarizes about 40 structurally characterized 3D domain-swapped proteins, emphasizing diverse swapped domains, flexible hinge loops, and examples including RNase A, T7 helicase, human prion, and cystatin C. It proposes that 3D domain swapping can occur under appropriate conditions in any protein with an unconstrained terminus and may relate to oligomerization, allostery, and amyloid formation.
Key findings
- About 40 domain-swapped proteins have known structures; all swapped domains except one are from either the N or C terminus, and swapped domains vary widely in size, sequence, and secondary structure, with no specific sequence motif found.
- RNase A can swap both N- and C-terminal domains: structures include the N-terminal swapped dimer (2.1 Å), C-terminal swapped dimer (1.75 Å), and cyclic C-terminal swapped trimer (2.2 Å); RNase A is the first protein found to form both linear and cyclic domain-swapped oligomers.
- Blood coagulant factor IX/X-binding protein is the only known example of 3D domain swapping in the middle of the molecule and the only known domain-swapped heterodimer; T7 gene 4 ring helicase forms open oligomeric domain swapping along a six-fold screw axis and requires swapping for hexamerization and activity.
- Human prion and human cystatin C form domain-swapped dimers and are amyloidogenic, suggesting domain swapping and amyloid formation may share common intermediates; physiological relevance is supported for some proteins, such as RNase A dimerization at pH 6.5 and 37°C with a dissociation constant of ∼2 mM, but considered artifact for others such as barnase at pH 4.5 and truncated TrkA Domain 5.
Methods
- Review and structural synthesis of domain-swapped proteins, tabulating bona fide examples, quasi-domain-swapped proteins, and candidates in Tables 1–3 with PDB codes, residue counts, swapped domains, hinge loops, and functions.
- Compares crystal and NMR structures plus biochemical data from cited studies, with detailed discussion of six examples: IX/X-binding protein, RNase A trimers, glyoxalase I, T7 helicase, human prion, and human cystatin C.
- Main analysis is qualitative structural comparison and synthesis of a free-energy/mechanism model for 3D domain swapping.
Limitations
- The paper states that the mechanism of 3D domain swapping remains elusive, few studies have examined it, and it is unclear whether the domain-swapped dimer is the building block for amyloid fibers.
- The paper states that RNase A tetramer structures are unknown and models are hypothetical; glyoxalase I C-terminal domain swapping is ambiguous because there are two ways to define the monomer, and the crystal structure of the monomer is needed.
- Evident from the text: this is a review without new experimental data, and some hinge-loop residues in candidate proteins are speculative and marked with question marks.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 83 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Most swapped domains in domain-swapped proteins are at either the N or C terminus.
“Analyses of the now about 40 structurally characterized cases of domain-swapped proteins reveal that most swapped domains are at either the N or C terminus”
- Also stated in: § Advances in 3D domain swapping · plain
“One common feature of these domain-swapped proteins is that all the swapped domains (except in one protein) are from either the N terminus or the C terminus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of about 40 structurally characterized domain-swapped proteins is representative of domain-swapped proteins generally.
- Also stated in: § Advances in 3D domain swapping · plain
- Findingown data
The swapped domains of domain-swapped proteins are diverse in their primary and secondary structures.
“the swapped domains are diverse in their primary and secondary structures”
- Also stated in: § Diversity of the swapped domains · plain
“The swapped domains have diverse sizes and sequences.”
- Also stated in: § Diversity of the swapped domains · plain
“The swapped domains also have diverse secondary struc-tures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of about 40 structurally characterized domain-swapped proteins is representative of domain-swapped proteins generally.
- Also stated in: § Diversity of the swapped domains · plain
- Findingcitation
Several recent structural studies support the flexibility of hinge loops.
“Several recent structural studies of 3D domain swapping further support the flexibility of the hinge loops.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
When the hinge loop forms a β-strand or an α-helix, the oligomeric form is favored over the monomer.
“A common feature is that when the hinge loop forms a -strand or an ␣-helix, the oligomeric form is favored over the monomer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The only exception found to date to the rule that most swapped domains are at either the N or C terminus is blood coagulant factors IX/X-binding protein (IX/X-bp).
“The only exception found to date is blood coagulant factors IX/X-binding protein (IX/X-bp, Mizuno et al. 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mizuno et al. 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
No specific sequence motif can be found among swapped domains.
“No specific sequence motif can be found among these domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of about 40 structurally characterized domain-swapped proteins is representative of domain-swapped proteins generally.
- Findingreasoning
IX/X-bp is the only known example of 3D domain swapping taking place in the middle of the molecule, in contrast to other domain-swapped proteins, in which domain swapping takes place at either the N or C terminus.
“IX/X-bp is the only known example of 3D domain swapping taking place in the middle of the molecule, in contrast to other domain-swapped proteins, in which domain swapping takes place at either the N or C terminus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
More than one domain in a protein can swap.
“One advance in understanding 3D domain swapping is that more than one domain in a protein can swap.”
- Also stated in: § Swapping of more than one domain in a protein · boosted
“Thus, structural studies of 3D domain swapping in RNase A show that a protein can have domains swapped at both the N-and C-termini, and that these two types of swapping can occur simultaneously in one oligomer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Swapping of more than one domain in a protein · boosted
- Interpretationreasoning
3D domain swapping can occur under appropriate conditions in any protein with an unconstrained terminus.
“The present state of knowledge leads us to suggest that 3D domain swapping can occur under appropriate conditions in any protein with an unconstrained terminus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of about 40 structurally characterized domain-swapped proteins is representative of domain-swapped proteins generally.
- Premisecitation
RNase A forms a dimer during lyophilization in acetic acid.
“RNase A forms a dimer during lyophilization in acetic acid (Crestfield et al. 1962).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Crestfield et al. 1962
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A small amount of RNase A dimer exists in vivo.
“suggesting that a small amount of RNase A dimer does exist in vivo (Park and Raines 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Park and Raines 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The activation energy for 3D domain swapping varies among domain-swapped proteins.
“Therefore, the diverse sizes and sequences of the swapped domains suggest that the activation energy for 3D domain swapping varies among domain-swapped proteins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Single point mutations at the closed interface of p13suc1 shift the equilibrium between monomer and dimer.
“Single point mutations at the closed interface of the suppressor of cyclin dependent kinase 1 (p13suc1) shifted the equilibrium between monomer and dimer (Schymkowitz et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schymkowitz et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The same hinge loop of RNase A adopts different conformations in the monomer, the C-terminal swapped dimer, and the cyclic C-terminal swapped trimer.
“Therefore, the same hinge loop adopts different conformations in the monomer, the C-terminal swapped dimer, and the cyclic C-terminal swapped trimer of RNase A, showing the great flexibility of this hinge loop.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
RNase A dimerizes at pH 6.5 and 37°C, similar to physiological conditions.
“RNase A was reported to dimerize at pH 6.5 and 37°C, similar to the physiological conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Park and Raines 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Because domain swapping takes place in the middle of IX/X-bp, there are two hinge loops in each subunit.
“Because domain swapping takes place in the middle of IX/ X-bp, there are two hinge loops in each subunit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
IX/X-bp is quasidomain-swapped.
“Thus, IX/X-bp is quasidomainswapped.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Based on biochemical data from P. putida Glx I, human Glx I is regarded as a protein with two domains swapped, as proposed by Cameron et al. (1997).
“Based on these biochemical data, we regard human Glx I as a protein with two domains swapped, as proposed by Cameron et al. (1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cameron et al. 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Saint-Jean et al. 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The biochemical behavior of Pseudomonas putida Glx I (55% sequence identity to human Glx I) can be used to infer the active-site completeness and domain-swapping state of human Glx I.
- Premisecitation
A trimeric model with both N- and C-terminal swapping was proposed for the more abundant RNase A trimer.
“Based on the structures of the N-and C-terminal swapped dimers, a trimeric model with both types of swapping (Fig. 2) was proposed (Liu et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
RNase A also forms tetramers.
“RNase A also forms tetramers (Gotte et al. 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gotte et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
RNase A represents the first protein found to form both linear and cyclic domain-swapped oligomers.
“Thus, RNase A represents the first protein found to form both linear and cyclic domain-swapped oligomers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
RNase A forms dimers and trimers during lyophilization in acetic acid.
“RNase A forms dimers and trimers during lyophilization in acetic acid (Crestfield et al. 1962;Gotte et al. 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Crestfield et al. 1962
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gotte et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
RNase A also forms trimers.
“RNase A also forms trimers (Gotte et al. 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gotte et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Based on its sequence, a protein cannot be predicted to be domain-swapped or not.
“Therefore, based on its sequence, a protein cannot be predicted to be domain-swapped or not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The structures of the RNase A trimers support the earlier proposal that a protein can form a linear or cyclic oligomer by 3D domain swapping.
“The structures of the RNase A trimers support the earlier proposal that a protein can form a linear or cyclic oligomer by 3D domain swapping.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
RNase A oligomers display higher enzyme activity on double-strand RNA than does the monomer.
“RNase A oligomers display higher enzyme activity on double-strand RNA than does the monomer (Gotte et al. 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gotte et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Diphtheria toxin forms a domain-swapped dimer upon binding to its receptor at neutral pH.
“more direct evidence of the physiological relevance of 3D domain swapping in DT comes from the crystal structure of the complex of DT and a domain of its receptor showing that DT forms domain-swapped dimer upon binding to its receptor at neutral pH (Louie et al. 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Louie et al. 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Macromolecular crowding may facilitate 3D domain swapping in vivo.
“Since high concentration of a protein favors 3D domain swapping, macromolecular crowding may facilitate 3D domain swapping in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The energy barrier between the closed monomer and the domain-swapped oligomer can be reduced by changes in pH, temperature, mutation, denaturants, or ligand binding.
“This energy barrier can be reduced under certain circumstances, such as change of pH, change of temperature, mutation in the protein, presence of denaturants, and binding of a ligand.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Four domains N-terminal to Domain 5 may block the swapping of the N-terminal strand of Domain 5 and result in a monomer of the intact molecule.
“These four domains may block the swapping of the N-terminal strand of Domain 5 and result in a monomer of the intact molecule.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Macromolecular crowding stabilizes protein oligomers.
“Macromolecular crowding also stabilizes protein oligomers (Eggers and Valentine 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eggers and Valentine 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Diphtheria toxin forms a domain-swapped dimer upon lowering pH.
“Diphtheria toxin (DT), which enters cells by endocytosis, was first found to form a domain-swapped dimer upon lowering pH (Carroll et al. 1986;Bennett et al. 1994a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Carroll et al. 1986
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bennett et al. 1994a
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There is a strain at the hinge loop of suc1 that controls the equilibrium of the monomer and the dimer through 3D domain swapping.
“It was reported that there is a strain at the hinge loop of suc1 which controls the equilibrium of the monomer and the dimer through 3D domain swapping (Rousseau et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rousseau et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
There is a high energy barrier between the closed monomer and the domain-swapped oligomer.
“Therefore, there is a high energy barrier between the closed monomer and the domain-swapped oligomer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
When the N-terminal domain of Spo0A is phosphorylated, it exists as a monomer.
“However, when this domain is phosphorylated, it exists as a monomer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lewis et al. 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Several domain-swapped proteins are fragments of their complete molecules, whereas the intact molecule is a monomer.
“In addition, several domain-swapped proteins are fragments of their complete molecules, whereas the intact molecule is a monomer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Hinge loops may form new interactions in the domain-swapped dimer, which favor dimerization.
“Second, hinge loops may form new interactions in the domain-swapped dimer, which favor dimerization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By changing the hinge loop or engineering the open interface, one can change the equilibrium between the monomer and the domain-swapped oligomer.
“Therefore, by changing the hinge loop or engineering the open interface, one can change the equilibrium between the monomer and the domain-swapped oligomer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
New interactions at the open interface make the domain-swapped oligomer more favorable thermodynamically.
“Third, new interactions at the open interface make the domain-swapped oligomer more favorable thermodynamically (Kuhlman et al. 2001;Liu et al. 2001;Rousseau et al. 2001;Schymkowitz et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kuhlman et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Liu et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rousseau et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The domain-swapped dimer of Domain 5 is incapable of binding to the natural ligand.
“However, the domain-swapped dimer is incapable of binding to the natural ligand (Urfer et al. 1995).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Urfer et al. 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Ligand binding may regulate the functions of its receptor through 3D domain swapping.
“suggesting that ligand binding may regulate the functions of its receptor through 3D domain swapping.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Shortening the hinge loop causes Domain 1 of CD2, staphylococcal nuclease, and single chain Fv to form domain-swapped dimers.
“After the hinge loop is shortened, Domain 1 of CD2 (Murray et al. 1995), staphylococcal nuclease (Green et al. 1995), and single chain Fv (Kortt et al. 1994;Perisic et al. 1994) form domain-swapped dimers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Murray et al. 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Green et al. 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kortt et al. 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The greater entropy of the monomer makes it more favored thermodynamically.
“First, the greater entropy of the monomer makes it more favored thermodynamically.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The greater entropy of the monomer makes it more favored thermodynamically.
- Premisecitation
Domain 5 of TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC alone is domain-swapped at its N-terminal strand.
“Domain 5 alone is domainswapped at its N-terminal strand (Ultsch et al. 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ultsch et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Phosphorylated whole Spo0A is a dimer in solution.
“The contradictory fact is that the phosphorylated whole Spo0A is a dimer in solution (Lewis et al. 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lewis et al. 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A free energy diagram was proposed for the pathways of 3D domain swapping based on the monomeric and dimeric structures of DT and the conditions to form its dimer.
“Based on the monomeric and dimeric structures of DT and the conditions to form its dimer, a free energy diagram was proposed for the pathways of 3D domain swapping (Bennett et al. 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bennett et al. 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Even though the dissociation constant for the RNase A dimer is greater than the concentration of RNase A in bovine pancreas, the amount of dimers formed in vivo may be higher than calculated from the dissociation constant, due to macromolecular crowding.
“Therefore, even though the dissociation constant for the dimer of RNase A is greater than the concentration of RNase A in bovine pancreas, the amount of dimers formed in vivo may be higher than the amount calculated from the dissociation constant, due to macromolecular crowding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Thermodynamic activity exceeds concentration.
- Premisecitation
The N-terminal domain of Spo0A forms a domain-swapped dimer at pH 4.0.
“The N-terminal domain of sporulation response regulator Spo0A forms a domain-swapped dimer at pH 4.0.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lewis et al. 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Ligand binding to suc1, which is distant from the hinge loop, shifts the equilibrium.
“Ligand binding to suc1, which is distant from the hinge loop, also shifted the equilibrium”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schymkowitz et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The RNase A minor trimer is stabilized by polyethylene glycol (PEG) 10,000 even at pH 3.5.
“This effect was seen during the crystallization of the RNase A minor trimer, which is stabilized by polyethylene glycol (PEG) 10,000 even at pH 3.5 (Liu et al. 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al. 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Barnase forms a domain-swapped trimer at pH 4.5.
“At pH 4.5, it forms a domain-swapped trimer (Zegers et al. 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zegers et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The engineered chimera of RNase A and BS-RNase (Canals et al. 2001) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping.
“| chimera (Canals et al. 2001) | | | | | RNase A and BS-RNase) | |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Canals et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The SigE dimer (PDB 1K3S; 113 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping.
“| SigE dimer (Luo et al. 2001) | 1K3S | 113 | | | Molecular chaperone in type | |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Luo et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The Fyn-SH3 monomer (PDB 1FYN; 62 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with hinge loop residues 112-118.
“| Fyn-SH3 monomer (Musacchio | 1FYN | 62 | | 112-118 | Signal transduction | |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Musacchio et al. 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In p13suc1, two prolines at the hinge loop control the balance of monomeric and dimeric forms by strains at the hinge loop.
“These two prolines control the balance of the monomeric and the dimeric forms by the strains at the hinge loop.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rousseau et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The monomer of two repeats of α-spectrin (PDB 1CUN; 211 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping.
“| Monomer of two repeats of | 1CUN | 211 | | | Cytoskeletal protein | |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grum et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
3D domain swapping takes place in proteins involved in diverse biological functions.
“In this review, we have summarized structures showing that 3D domain swapping takes place in proteins involved in diverse biological functions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Studies on p13suc1, CD2, and Protein L suggest that these proteins are completely unfolded on the pathway to 3D domain swapping.
“However, studies on p13suc1, CD2, and Protein L suggest that these proteins are completely unfolded on the pathway to 3D domain swapping (Hayes et al. 1999;Kuhlman et al. 2001;Rousseau et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hayes et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kuhlman et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rousseau et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The Grb2 adaptor (SH2 + SH3 domains; PDB 1GR1; 217 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping.
“| Grb2 adaptor (SH2 + SH3) | 1GR1 | 217 | | | Signal transduction | |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maignan et al. 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lengthening the hinge loop of the domain-swapped dimer of cro repressor leads to monomer formation.
“On the other hand, lengthening the hinge loop of the domainswapped dimer of cro repressor leads to the monomer formation (Albright et al. 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Albright et al. 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Structural studies of DT and RNase A suggest that 3D domain swapping occurs through partial unfolding of the monomer, to a core whose structure remains intact and to intact terminal domains free to move and swap.
“Structural studies of DT and RNase A suggest that 3D domain swapping occurs in these proteins through partial unfolding of the monomer, to a core whose structure remains intact and to intact terminal domains free to move and to swap (Bennett et al. 1995;Liu et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bennett et al. 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Liu et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
- May combine two claims. 46
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenAbout 40 domain-swapped proteins have known structures.
“To date, about 40 domain-swapped proteins have known structures.”
- Also stated in: § New examples of 3D domain swapping in proteins · plain
“To date, about 40 domain-swapped proteins have been reported.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of about 40 structurally characterized domain-swapped proteins is representative of domain-swapped proteins generally.
- Also stated in: § New examples of 3D domain swapping in proteins · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIX/X-bp is the only known example of a domain-swapped heterodimer; all other domain-swapped proteins are homooligomers.
“In addition, IX/X-bp is the only known example of a domain-swapped heterodimer; all other domain-swapped proteins are homooligomers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The set of about 40 structurally characterized domain-swapped proteins is representative of domain-swapped proteins generally.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the less abundant RNase A dimer, the N-terminal helix is swapped; in the other dimer, the C-terminal strand is swapped.
“Structures of both dimers (Fig. 2) reveal that the N-terminal helix is swapped in the less abundant dimer (the N-terminal swapped dimer, previously named the minor dimer) (Liu et al. 1998), whereas the Cterminal strand is swapped in the other dimer (the C-terminal swapped dimer, previously named the major dimer) (Liu et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Liu et al. 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Liu et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRNase A forms two types of dimers, with one dimer more abundant than the other.
“Further studies showed that there are two types of dimers of RNase A, formed with one dimer more abundant than the other dimer (Libonati et al. 1996;Gotte et al. 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Libonati et al. 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gotte et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning3D domain swapping does not depend on the protein sequence or secondary structure.
“In summary, the diversity of the swapped domains indicates that 3D domain swapping does not depend on the protein sequence or secondary structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning3D domain swapping is required for the hexamerization and the activity of T7 helicase.
“Therefore, 3D domain swapping is required for the hexamerization and the activity of T7 helicase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe dissociation constant for the RNase A dimer at pH 6.5 and 37°C is about 2 mM, about 20-fold greater than the concentration of RNase A in the bovine pancreas.
“The dissociation constant for the dimer at this condition is ∼2 mM, which is about 20-fold greater than the concentration of RNase A in the bovine pancreas”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Park and Raines 2000
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning3D domain swapping in RNase A exists in vivo and may play some physiological role.
“These results suggest that 3D domain swapping in RNase A exists in vivo and may play some physiological role.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenBy examining domain-swapped proteins, domain swapping is physiologically relevant in some proteins, but not in others.
“By examining domain-swapped proteins, we conclude that domain swapping is physiologically relevant in some proteins, but not in others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationT7 helicase provides structural evidence for 3D domain swapping in a hexamer, supporting the proposal that 3D domain swapping is a mechanism for extended protein oligomerization.
“T7 helicase provides the structural evidence for 3D domain swapping in a hexamer, supporting the proposal that 3D domain swapping is a mechanism for extended protein oligomerization (Bennett et al. 1995).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bennett et al. 1995
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese studies show that domain swapping and amyloid formation may share common intermediates, and thus suggest that 3D domain swapping is a possible mechanism for amyloid formation.
“Although it is unclear whether the domain-swapped dimer is the building block for these fibers, these studies show that domain swapping and amyloid formation may share common intermediates, and thus suggest that 3D domain swapping is a possible mechanism for amyloid formation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning3D domain swapping does not require or prefer certain types of secondary structure.
“This diversity shows that 3D domain swapping does not require or prefer certain types of secondary structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the less abundant RNase A trimer, only the C-terminal strand is swapped, and the structure is cyclic.
“In the less abundant trimer, only the C-terminal strand is swapped, and the structure is cyclic (cyclic C-terminal swapped trimer, previously named the minor trimer, Fig. 2) (Liu et al. 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al. 2002
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe 'cab'-type β class carbonic anhydrase, RecA, and the T7 helicase display open-oligomeric 3D domain swapping, which can be seen in crystals because the oligomer screw-axis symmetry is also a symmetry of the crystal.
“In summary, the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRNase A oligomers display two basic types of 3D domain swapping, and with two types of swapping, a protein can form a variety of oligomers.
“Thus, RNase A oligomers display two basic types of 3D domain swapping, and show that with two types of swapping, a protein can form a variety of oligomers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFurther biochemical studies support the trimeric model and indicate that it belongs to the more abundant RNase A trimer.
“Further biochemical studies support this model and indicate that the model belongs to the more abundant trimer (linear N-and C-terminal swapped trimer, previously named the major trimer).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al. 2002
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation3D domain swapping in BS-RNase is necessary for its immunosuppression activity and allostery activity.
“3D domain swapping in bovine seminal ribonuclease (BS-RNase, sharing 80% sequence identity with RNase A, Mazzarella et al. 1993) was reported to be necessary for its immunosuppression activity and allostery activity (Piccoli et al. 1988;Cafaro et al. 1995)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Piccoli et al. 1988
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cafaro et al. 1995
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCyanovirin-N was crystallized under low pH and shown to be domain-swapped.
“Cyanovirin-N (Yang et al. 1999) was also crystallized under low pH and was shown to be domain-swapped.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yang et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBS-RNase, T7 helicase, cro repressor, phosphoenolpyruvate mutase, T4 endonuclease VII, IX/X-binding protein, and bleomycin resistance protein exist as domain-swapped oligomers in vivo.
“These proteins include BS-RNase (Mazzarella et al. 1993), T7 helicase (Singleton et al. 2000), cro repressor (Anderson et al. 1981), phosphoenolpyruvate mutase (Huang et al. 1999), T4 endonuclease VII (Raaijmakers et al. 1999), IX/X-binding protein (Mizuno et al. 1997), and bleomycin resistance protein (Dumas et al. 1994).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mazzarella et al. 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Singleton et al. 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Anderson et al. 1981
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning3D domain swapping is a mechanism for allostery and signal sensing in a macromolecule, and therefore for regulating biological functions of proteins.
“These studies provide evidence for 3D domain swapping as a mechanism for allostery and signal sensing in a macromolecule, and therefore for regulating biological functions of proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMutations that shift the equilibrium are distant from the hinge loop, suggesting that the strain at the hinge loop can be sensed by remote mutation sites.
“The mutations that shift the equilibrium are distant from the hinge loop, suggesting that the strain at the hinge loop can be “sensed” by the remote mutation sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation3D domain swapping regulated by ligands was reported in glyoxalase I and p13suc1, where the equilibrium between monomer and dimer is regulated by glutathione and phosphopeptide, respectively.
“3D domain swapping regulated by ligands was reported in glyoxalase I (Saint-Jean et al. 1998) and p13suc1 (Schymkowitz et al. 2001), where the equilibrium between the monomer and the dimer is regulated by glutathione and phosphopeptide, respectively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Saint-Jean et al. 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schymkowitz et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMacromolecular crowding increases protein local concentration and facilitates protein oligomerization.
“Macromolecular crowding increases protein local concentration and facilitates protein oligomerization (Cole and Ralston 1994;Lindner and Ralston 1995;Rivas et al. 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cole and Ralston 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lindner and Ralston 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rivas et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSeveral domain-swapped oligomers are obtained under nonphysiological low pH, and the biological functions of the oligomers are unknown.
“Several domain-swapped oligomers are obtained under nonphysiological low pH, and the biological functions of the oligomers are unknown.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSmaller domains form domain-swapped oligomers more easily than larger domains, and may do so under nonphysiological conditions.
“these examples suggest that smaller domains form domain-swapped oligomers more easily than larger domains, and may do so under nonphysiological conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe active forms of these proteins are domain-swapped, suggesting that their 3D domain swapping is related to their biological functions in vivo.
“However, the active forms of these proteins are domain-swapped, suggesting that their 3D domain swapping is related to their biological functions in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMacromolecular crowding in cells increases the population of domain-swapped oligomers and adds support to the possible physiological relevance of 3D domain swapping.
“Thus, macromolecular crowding in cells increases the population of domain-swapped oligomers and thus in a general way adds support to the possible physiological relevance to 3D domain swapping.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationDomain swapping in Domain 5 is regarded as a consequence of truncation of the whole protein and is not of physiological significance.
“Therefore, domain swapping in Domain 5 is regarded as a consequence of the truncation of the whole protein (Ultsch et al. 1999) and is not of physiological significance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ultsch et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe T4 endonuclease VII dimer (PDB 1EN7; 157 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 60 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 63-72.
“| T4 endonuclease VII dimer (Raaijmakers | 1EN7 | 157 | 60 | 63-72 (?) | Mismatch repair, Resolving | N-terminal helix |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Raaijmakers et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe dimer of one repeat of α-spectrin (PDB 2SPC; 107 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 32 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 72-75.
“| Dimer of one repeat of ␣-spectrin | 2SPC | 107 | 32 | 72-75 | Cytoskeletal protein | C-terminal ␣-helix |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yan et al. 1993
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe designed coiled coil dimer (PDB 1G6U; 48 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 14 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 33-34.
“| Designed coiled coil dimer (Ogihara | 1G6U | 48 | 14 | 33-34 (?) | Unknown | C-terminal ␣-helix |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ogihara et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Cab-type β class carbonic anhydrase (PDB 1G5C; 170 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 12 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 13-23.
“| Cab-type  class carbonic anhydrase | 1G5C | 170 | 12 | 13-23 (?) | Catalyzing reversible hydration | N-terminal ␣-helix |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Strop et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn several proteins, 3D domain swapping is found in the active form, whereas in other proteins, domain swapping seems an artifact of truncation of the whole molecules.
“In several proteins, 3D domain swapping is found in the active form of these proteins, whereas in other proteins, domain swapping seems an artifact of truncation of the whole molecules.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe CesT dimer (PDB 1K3E; 156 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 32 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 33-36.
“| CesT dimer (Luo et al. 2001) | 1K3E | 156 | 32 | 33-36 | Molecular chaperone in type | N-terminal ␣-helix |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Luo et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe dUTPase trimer (PDB 1DUD; 136 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 10 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 125-126.
“| dUTPase trimer (Larsson et al. 1996) | 1DUD | 136 | 10 | 125-126 (?) dUTP hydrolysis | C-terminal strand |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Larsson et al. 1996
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe citrate synthase dimer from chicken heart (PDB 1CTS; 433 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 10 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 417-423.
“| Citrate synthase dimer from chicken heart | 1CTS | 433 | 10 | 417-423 (?) Citrate synthesis | C-terminal helix |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Remington et al. 1982
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe heat shock protein 33 dimer (PDB 1HW7; 255 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 75 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 178-184.
“| Heat shock protein 33 dimer | 1HW7 | 255 | 75 | 178-184 (?) Molecular chaperone | C-terminal helices |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vijayalakshmi et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe bleomycin resistance protein dimer (PDB 1BYL; 122 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 8 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 9-11.
“| Bleomycin resistance protein dimer | 1BYL | 122 | 8 | 9-11 (?) | Bleomycin resistance | N-terminal -strand |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dumas et al. 1994
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Grb2-SH2 domain dimer (PDB 1FYR; 93 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 27 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 121-123.
“| Grb2-SH2 domain dimer (Schiering | 1FYR | 93 | 27 | 121-123 | Binding phosphorylated | C-terminal ␣-helix |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schiering et al. 2000
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe BTB domain of PLZF (PDB 1BUO; 120 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 12 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 13-23.
“| BTB domain of PLZF (Ahmad et al. | 1BUO | 120 | 12 | 13-23 (?) | Evolutionarily conserved | N-terminal -strand |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ahmad et al. 1998
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe phosphoenolpyruvate mutase dimer (PDB 1PGM; 295 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 35 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 240-260.
“| Phosphoenolpyruvate mutase dimer | 1PGM | 295 | 35 | 240-260 (?) Converting | C-terminal helices |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Huang et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe T7 gene 4-ring helicase hexamer fragment (PDB 1E0J; 326 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 40 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 283-305.
“| T7 gene 4-ring helicase hexamer | 1E0J | 326 | 40 | 283-305 (?) Separation of nucleic acid | N-terminal ␣-helix |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Singleton et al. 2000
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe SH3 domain of Eps8 (PDB 1AOJ; 65 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 26 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 34-39.
“| SH3 domain of Eps8 (Kishan et al. | 1AOJ | 65 | 26 | 34-39 | Recognition of proline-rich | C-terminal |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kishan et al. 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe independence of 3D domain swapping from protein sequence, secondary structure and hinge loop suggests that any protein can be domain-swapped under appropriate conditions where the terminal domain of the protein is unconstrained.
“The independence of 3D domain swapping from protein sequence, secondary structure and hinge loop suggests that any protein can be domain-swapped under appropriate conditions where the terminal domain of the protein is unconstrained.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe beef liver catalase dimer (PDB 7CAT; 500 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 65 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 66-70.
“| Catalase dimer (beef liver) (Fita and | 7CAT | 500 | 65 | 66-70 (?) | H 2 O 2 hydrolysis | N-terminal helices |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fita and Rossmann 1985
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe simian virus 40 oligomer (PDB 1SVA; 361 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 61 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 296-300.
“| Simian virus 40 oligomer (Stehle et al. | 1SVA | 361 | 61 | 296-300 (?) Virus coat protein | C-terminal helix |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stehle et al. 1996
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe E. coli RecA hexamer (PDB 2REB; 352 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 26 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 27-39.
“| RecA hexamer from E. coli (Story et al. | 2REB | 352 | 26 | 27-39 (?) | DNA recombination and repair | N-terminal ␣-helix |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Story et al. 1992
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe T7 gene 4-ring helicase fragment (PDB 1CR0; 296 residues per subunit) is a candidate for 3D domain swapping, with 12 residues in the swapped domain and hinge loop residues 283-305.
“| T7 gene 4-ring helicase fragment | 1CR0 | 296 | 12 | 283-305 (?) Unknown | N-terminal ␣-helix |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sawaya et al. 1999
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
The set of about 40 structurally characterized domain-swapped proteins is representative of domain-swapped proteins generally.
“Analyses of the now about 40 structurally characterized cases of domain-swapped proteins reveal that most swapped domains are at either the N or C terminus”
“To date, about 40 domain-swapped proteins have known structures.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The biochemical behavior of Pseudomonas putida Glx I (55% sequence identity to human Glx I) can be used to infer the active-site completeness and domain-swapping state of human Glx I.
“Biochemical data show an equilibrium of monomer and dimer in Glx I from Pseudomonas putida (55% sequence identity to human Glx I), and both the monomer and the dimer are active (Saint-Jean et al. 1998).”
“Based on these biochemical data, we regard human Glx I as a protein with two domains swapped, as proposed by Cameron et al. (1997).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Thermodynamic activity exceeds concentration.
“That is, thermodynamic activity exceeds concentration.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The greater entropy of the monomer makes it more favored thermodynamically.
“First, the greater entropy of the monomer makes it more favored thermodynamically.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This target has very extensive inter-subunit interactions, including a domain swap in which part of the fold of one monomer occupies the corresponding position of a neighboring one.
“This is an unusual target in that there are very extensive inter-subunit interactions, including a domain swap21 in which part of the fold of one monomer occupies the corresponding position of a neighboring one.”
From Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round <scp>XIV</scp> (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
C-terminal-swapped trimer is called N-terminal-swapped
MinorThe sentence calls the cyclic RNase A trimer N-terminal-swapped but then says it swaps C-terminal strands. Elsewhere, the paper identifies the cyclic trimer as C-terminal-swapped.
“In addition, the crystal structure of the RNase A N-terminal swapped trimer shows that it is a cyclic molecule, with swapping of the C-terminal strands (Fig. 2; Liu et al. 2002).”
“In the less abundant trimer, only the C-terminal strand is swapped, and the structure is cyclic (cyclic C-terminal swapped trimer, previously named the minor trimer, Fig. 2) (Liu et al. 2002).”
Cites
[26] Raster3D: Photorealistic molecular graphics
Merritt, E. A., & Bacon, D. (1997) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(97)77028-9 · Cited by 3,749 · see citing works
Minton, A. P. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r100005200 · Cited by 1,474 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The effect of other macromolecules on a specific macromolecule in cells has been studied and termed “macromolecular crowding” (Minton 2001).”
BackgroundNMR solution structure of the human prion protein
Zahn, R., Aizhuo Liu, A., Lührs, T., Riek, R., von Schroetter, C., García, F. L., Billeter, M., Calzolai, L., Wider, G., & Kurt Wüthrich, A. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.1.145 · Cited by 1,097 · see citing works
3D domain swapping: A mechanism for oligomer assembly
Bennett, M. J., Schlunegger, M. P., & Eisenberg, D. S. (1995) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5560041202 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Self-citationThe structure of the E. coli recA protein monomer and polymer
Story, R. M., Weber, I. T., & Steitz, T. A. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/355318a0 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Bode, W., Engh, R. A., Müsil, D., Thiele, U., Huber, R., Karshikov, A., Brzin, J., Kos, J., & Türk, V. (1988) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03109.x · Cited by 591 · see citing works
Structure of the cro repressor from bacteriophage λ and its interaction with DNA
Anderson, W. F., Ohlendorf, D. H., Takeda, Y., & Matthews, B. W. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/290754a0 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
Weis, W. I., Kahn, R., Fourme, R., Drickamer, K., & Hendrickson, W. A. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1721241 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
PATHOLOGIC CONFORMATIONS OF PRION PROTEINS
Cohen, F. E., & Prusiner, S. B. (1998) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.793 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Domain swapping: entangling alliances between proteins.
Bennett, M. J., Choe, S., & Eisenberg, D. S. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.8.3127 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Self-citationCrystal structure of the human prion protein reveals a mechanism for oligomerization.
Knaus, K. J., Morillas, M., Świętnicki, W., Malone, M. H., Surewicz, W. K., & Yee, V. C. (2001) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0901-770 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Remington, S. J., Wiegand, G., & Huber, R. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90452-1 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Singleton, M. R., Sawaya, M. R., Ellenberger, T., & Wigley, D. B. (2000) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80871-5 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
The molecular structure and stability of the eye lens: X-ray analysis of γ-crystallin II
Blundell, T. L., Lindley, P. F., Miller, L., Moss, D. S., Slingsby, C., Tickle, I. J., Turnell, B., & Wistow, G. J. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/289771a0 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Wiesmann, C., Ultsch, M. H., Bass, S., & de Vos, A. M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/43705 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Human cystatin C, an amyloidogenic protein, dimerizes through three-dimensional domain swapping.
Janowski, R., Kozak, M., Jankowska, E., Grzonka, Z., GRUBB, A. O., Abrahamson, M., & Jaskólski, M. (2001) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/86188 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Molecular confinement influences protein structure and enhances thermal protein stability
Eggers, D. K., & Valentine, J. S. (2001) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.36201 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Pheromone binding to two rodent urinary proteins revealed by X-ray crystallography
Böcskei, Z., Groom, C. R., Flower, D. R., Wright, C. E., Phillips, S. E. V., Cavaggioni, A., Findlay, J. B. C., & North, A. C. T. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/360186a0 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Crystal Structure of the Repetitive Segments of Spectrin
Yan, Y., Winograd, E., Viel, A., Cronin, T. J., Harrison, S. C., & Branton, D. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8266097 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Musacchio, A., Saraste, M., & Wilmanns, M. (1994) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0894-546 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
The structure of simian virus 40 refined at 3.1 å resolution
Stehle, T., Gamblin, S. J., Yan, Y., & Harrison, S. C. (1996) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(96)00020-2 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Crystal structure of the BTB domain from PLZF
Ahmad, K. F., Engel, C. K., & Privé, G. G. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.21.12123 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Crystal structure at 2.8 Å resolution of a soluble form of the cell adhesion molecule CD2
Jones, E. Y., Davis, S. J., Williams, A., Harlos, K., & Stuart, D. I. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/360232a0 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Oligomer Formation By 3D Domain Swapping: A Model For Protein Assembly And Misassembly
Schlunegger, M. P., Bennett, M. D., & Eisenberg, D. S. (1997) · Advances in protein chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60319-8 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Self-citationCrystal Structure of the Helicase Domain from the Replicative Helicase-Primase of Bacteriophage T7
Sawaya, M. R., Guo, S., Tabor, S., Richardson, C. C., & Ellenberger, T. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81648-7 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
X-ray analysis of βB2-crystallin and evolution of oligomeric lens proteins
Bax, B. D., Lapatto, R., Nalini, V., DRIESSEN, H. P. C., Lindley, P. F., Mahadevan, D., Blundell, T. L., & Slingsby, C. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/347776a0 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Solution structure of cyanovirin-N, a potent HIV-inactivating protein
Bewley, C. A., Gustafson, K. R., Boyd, M. R., Covell, D. G., Bax, A., Clore, G. M., & Gronenborn, A. M. (1998) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/828 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
A domain-swapped RNase A dimer with implications for amyloid formation.
Liu, Y., Gotte, G., Libonati, M., & Eisenberg, D. S. (2001) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/84941 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Self-citationLoll, P. J., & Lattman, E. E. (1989) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340050302 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Milburn, M. V., Hassell, A. M., Lambert, M. H., Jordan, S. R., Proudfoot, A. E. I., Graber, P., & Wells, T. N. C. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363172a0 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Structures of Two Repeats of Spectrin Suggest Models of Flexibility
Grum, V. L., Li, D., MacDonald, R. I., & Mondragón, A. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81980-7 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
McGee, A. W., Dakoji, S., Olsen, O., Bredt, D. S., Lim, W. A., & Prehoda, K. E. (2001) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00411-7 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Crystal structure of human glyoxalase I—evidence for gene duplication and 3D domain swapping
Cameron, A. D., Olin, B., Ridderström, M., Mannervik, B., & Jones, T. A. (1997) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/16.12.3386 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Zdanov, A. S., Schalk‐Hihi, C., Gustchina, A., Tsang, M., Weatherbee, J. A., & Wlodawer, A. (1995) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00193-9 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Domain swapping creates a third putative combining site in bovine odorant binding protein dimer
Tegoni, M., Ramoni, R., Bignetti, E., Spinelli, S., & Cambillau, C. (1996) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb1096-863 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Crystal Structure of the Mammalian Grb2 Adaptor
Maignan, S., Guilloteau, J. P., Fromage, N., Arnoux, B., Becquart, J., & Ducruix, A. F. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7716522 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Staniforth, R. A., Giannini, S., Higgins, L. D., Conroy, M. J., Hounslow, A. M., Jerala, R., Craven, C. J., & Waltho, J. P. (2001) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/20.17.4774 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Rousseau, F., Schymkowitz, J. W. H., Wilkinson, H. R., & Itzhaki, L. S. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.101542098 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Renaturation of Escherichia coli Tryptophanase after Exposure to 8 M Urea
London, J., Skrzynia, C., & GOLDBERG, M. E. (1974) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03707.x · Cited by 197 · see citing works
The refined crystal structure of ribonuclease A at 2.0 A resolution.
Wlodawer, A., Bott, R., & Sjölin, L. (1982) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)68195-0 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Crystal structure of a diabody, a bivalent antibody fragment
Perišić, O., Webb, P. A., Holliger, P., Winter, G. P., & Williams, R. L. (1994) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(94)00123-5 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
The crystal structure of a 3D domain-swapped dimer of RNase A at a 2.1-Å resolution
Liu, Y., Hart, P. J., Schlunegger, M. P., & Eisenberg, D. S. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.7.3437 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Self-citationUltsch, M. H., Wiesmann, C., Simmons, L. C., Henrich, J., Yang, M., Reilly, D. E., Bass, S., & de Vos, A. M. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2816 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Design of three-dimensional domain-swapped dimers and fibrous oligomers
Ogihara, N. L., Ghirlanda, G., Bryson, J. W., Gingery, M., DeGrado, W. F., & Eisenberg, D. S. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.4.1404 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Self-citationRefined structure of monomelic diphtheria toxin at 2.3 Å resolution
Bennett, M. J., & Eisenberg, D. S. (1994) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5560030912 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Self-citationYang, F., Bewley, C. A., Louis, J. M., Gustafson, K. R., Boyd, M. R., Gronenborn, A. M., Clore, G. M., & Wlodawer, A. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2693 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Goodsell, D. S. (2009) · Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84925-6 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
The NADPH binding site on beef liver catalase.
Fita, I., & Rossmann, M. G. (1985) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.82.6.1604 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Rivas, G., Fernandez, J. A., & Minton, A. P. (1999) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi990355z · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Refined structure of dimeric diphtheria toxin at 2.0 Å resolution
Bennett, M. J., Choe, S., & Eisenberg, D. S. (1994) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5560030911 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Self-citationAn immunoglobulin‐like domain determines the specificity of neurotrophin receptors.
Urfer, R., Tsoulfas, P., O'Connell, L., Shelton, D. L., Parada, L. F., & Presta, L. G. (1995) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07279.x · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Phosphorylated aspartate in the structure of a response regulator protein 1 1Edited by A. R. Fersht
Lewis, R. J., Brannigan, J. A., Muchová, K., Barák, I., & Wilkinson, A. J. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.3261 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Proline cis-trans isomers in calbindin D9k observed by X-ray crystallography
Svensson, L. A., Thulin, E., & Forsén, S. (1992) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(92)90976-q · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Structural and biochemical characterization of the type III secretion chaperones CesT and SigE.
Luo, Y., Bertero, M. G., Frey, E. A., Pfuetzner, R. A., Wenk, M. R., Creagh, L., Marcus, S. L., Lim, D., Sicheri, F., Kay, C. M., et al. (2001) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb717 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
He, M. M., Clugston, S. L., Honek, J. F., & Matthews, B. W. (2000) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi000856g · Cited by 142 · see citing works
The dual-mode quaternary structure of seminal RNase.
Piccoli, R., Tamburrini, M., Piccialli, G., Donato, A. D., Parente, A., & D’Alessio, G. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.5.1870 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Raaijmakers, H. C. A., Vix, O., Törõ, I., Golz, S., Kemper, B., & Suck, D. (1999) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/18.6.1447 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Bovine seminal ribonuclease: structure at 1.9 Å resolution
Mazzarella, L., Capasso, S., Demasi, D., Lorenzo, G. D., Mattia, C. A., & Zagari, A. (1993) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444993003403 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Three‐dimensional crystal structure of recombinant murine interferon‐beta.
Senda, T., Shimazu, T., Matsuda, S., Kawano, G., Shimizu, H. M., Nakamura, K., & Mitsui, Y. (1992) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05396.x · Cited by 130 · see citing works
KORTT, A. A., MALBY, R. L., CALDWELL, J. B., GRUEN, L. C., IVANCIC, N., LAWRENCE, M. C., HOWLETT, G. J., WEBSTER, R. G., HUDSON, P. J., & COLMAN, P. M. (1994) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18724.x · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Strop, P., Smith, K. S., Iverson, T. M., Ferry, J. G., & Rees, D. C. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m009182200 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Structure of coagulation factors IX/X-binding protein, a heterodimer of C-type lectin domains
Mizuno, H., Fujimoto, Z., Koizumi, M., Kano, H., Atoda, H., & Morita, T. (1997) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0697-438 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Human CksHs2 Atomic Structure: a Role for Its Hexameric Assembly in Cell Cycle Control
Parge, H. E., Arvai, A. S., Murtari, D. J., Reed, S. I., & Tainer, J. A. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8211159 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Structures of the two 3D domain‐swapped RNase A trimers
Liu, Y., Gotte, G., Libonati, M., & Eisenberg, D. S. (2002) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.36602 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the aggregation of bovine pancreatic ribonuclease.
Am, C., Wh, S., & Moore, S. (1962) · PubMed · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Structural Basis for Catalysis by Tryptophan Synthase
Miles, E. W. (1991) · Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology/Advances in enzymology and related subjects · doi:10.1002/9780470123102.ch3 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Dumas, P., Bergdoll, M., Cagnon, C., & Masson, J. (1994) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06535.x · Cited by 105 · see citing works
One-step evolution of a dimer from a monomeric protein
Green, S. M., Gittis, A. G., Meeker, A. K., & Lattman, E. E. (1995) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0995-746 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Crystal Structure of the Complex of Diphtheria Toxin with an Extracellular Fragment of Its Receptor
Louie, G. V., Yang, W., Bowman, M. E., & Choe, S. (1997) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80008-8 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Crystal structure of the Escherichia coli dUTPase in complex with a substrate analogue (dUDP)
Larsson, G., Svensson, L. A., & Nyman, P. O. (1996) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0696-532 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
The SH3 domain of Eps8 exists as a novel intertwined dimer
Kishan, K. V. R., Scita, G., Wong, W. T., Fiore, P. P. D., & Newcomer, M. E. (1997) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0997-739 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Three-dimensional domain duplication, swapping and stealing
Heringa, J., & Taylor, W. R. (1997) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80060-7 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Subsite Binding in an RNase: Structure of a Barnase-Tetranucleotide Complex at 1.76-.ANG. Resolution
Buckle, A. M., & Fersht, A. R. (1994) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00173a005 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Structural versatility of bovine ribonuclease A
Gotte, G., Bertoldi, M., & Libonati, M. (1999) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00761.x · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Pei, X. Y., Holliger, P., Murzin, A. G., & Williams, R. L. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.18.9637 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Conversion of monomeric protein L to an obligate dimer by computational protein design
Kuhlman, B. A., O’Neill, J., Kim, D. E., Zhang, K. Y. J., & Baker, D. A. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.181354398 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
The antitumor action of seminal ribonuclease and its quaternary conformations
Cafaro, V., Lorenzo, C. D., Piccoli, R., Bracale, A., Mastronicola, M. R., Donato, A. D., & D’Alessio, G. (1995) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/0014-5793(94)01450-f · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Saint-Jean, A., Phillips, K. R., Creighton, D. J., & Stone, M. J. (1998) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi980868q · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Domain swapping in the sporulation response regulator Spo0A
Lewis, R. J., Muchová, K., Brannigan, J. A., Barák, I., Leonard, G. A., & Wilkinson, A. J. (2000) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.3598 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Arvai, A. S., Bourne, Y., Hickey, M. J., & Tainer, J. A. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1995.0341 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
One sequence, two folds: a metastable structure of CD2.
Murray, A. J., Lewis, S. J., Barclay, A. N., & Brady, R. L. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.16.7337 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
The crystal structure of p13suc1, a p34cdc2‐interacting cell cycle control protein.
Endicott, J., Noble, M. E. M., Garman, E. F., Brown, N., Rasmussen, B. F., Nurse, P., & Johnson, L. N. (1995) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07081.x · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Co-operativity in seminal ribonuclease function. Kinetic studies
Piccoli, R., Donato, A. D., & D’Alessio, G. (1988) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2530329 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Dimer Formation through Domain Swapping in the Crystal Structure of the Grb2-SH2−Ac-pYVNV Complex
Schiering, N., Casale, E., Caccia, P., Giordano, P., & BATTISTINI, C. (2000) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi0012336 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Frick, D. N., Baradaran, K., & Richardson, C. C. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.14.7957 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
O’Neill, J., Kim, D. E., Baker, D. A., & Zhang, K. Y. J. (2001) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444901000373 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Dimer formation by a “monomeric” protein
Park, C., & Raines, R. T. (2000) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.9.10.2026 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
The 2.2 Å Crystal Structure of Hsp33
Vijayalakshmi, J., Mukhergee, M. K., Graumann, J., Jakob, U., & Saper, M. A. (2001) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00597-4 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Dimeric form of diphtheria toxin: purification and characterization
Carroll, S. F., Barbieri, J. T., & Collier, R. J. (1986) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00357a019 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Characterization and crystallization of the helicase domain of bacteriophage T7 gene 4 protein
Bird, L. E. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.13.2620 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Goodsell, D. S. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2267-3 · Cited by 56
Trimeric domain-swapped barnase
Zegers, I., Deswarte, J., & Wyns, L. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.3.818 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Observation of signal transduction in three-dimensional domain swapping.
Schymkowitz, J. W. H., Rousseau, F., Wilkinson, H. R., Friedler, A., & Itzhaki, L. S. (2001) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb1001-888 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Canals, A., Pous, J., Guasch, A., Benito, A., Ribó, M., Vilanova, M., & Coll, M. (2001) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00659-1 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Klafki, H., Pick, A. I., Pardowitz, I., Cole, T. S., Lewa Adil, A. W. N. I., Barnikol, H. U., Mayer, F., Kratzin, H., & HILSCHMANN, N. (1993) · Biological Chemistry Hoppe-Seyler · doi:10.1515/bchm3.1993.374.7-12.1117 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Albright, R. A., Mossing, M. C., & Matthews, B. W. (1996) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi951958n · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Effects of dextran on the self-association of human spectrin
Lindner, R., & Ralston, G. (1995) · Biophysical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/0301-4622(95)00063-4 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Libonati, M., Bertoldi, M., & Sorrentino, S. (1996) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj3180287 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Huang, K., Li, Z., Jia, Y., Dunaway‐Mariano, D., & Herzberg, O. (1999) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80070-7 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
An extended hudrophobic core induces EF‐hand swapping
Håkansson, M., Svensson, A. E., Fast, J. L., & Linse, S. S. (2001) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.47501 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Jackson, D. A., & Yanofsky, C. (1969) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)93660-4 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Three-dimensional structures of single-chain Fv-neuraminidase complexes
Malby, R. L., McCoy, A. J., Kortt, A. A., Hudson, P. J., & Colman, P. M. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.1794 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Engineered assembly of intertwined oligomers of an immunoglobulin chain 1 1Edited by A. R. Fersht
Hayes, M., Sessions, R. B., Brady, R. L., & Clarke, A. R. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.2415 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Crystal structure of the yeast cell-cycle control protein, p13suc1, in a strand-exchanged dimer
Bernstein, N. K., Bateman, K., Chernaia, M. M., Michalak, M., & James, M. N. G. (1996) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(96)00034-2 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Low-resolution structure of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor
Diederichs, K., Jacques, S. L., Boone, T., & Karplus, P. A. (1991) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(91)80203-7 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Enhancement of self-association of human spectrin by polyethylene glycol
Cole, N., & Ralston, G. B. (1994) · International Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0020-711x(94)90109-0 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Low-resolution structure of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor*1
Diederichs, K. (1991) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(91)90803-e · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The C‐type lectin‐like domain superfamily
Zelensky, A. N., & Gready, J. E. (2005) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.05031.x · Cited by 1,411 · see citing works
Structure of a bacterial multidrug ABC transporter
Dawson, R. J. P., & Locher, K. P. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05155 · Cited by 1,280 · see citing works
Antibody Domain Exchange Is an Immunological Solution to Carbohydrate Cluster Recognition
Calarese, D. A., Scanlan, C. N., Zwick, M. B., Deechongkit, S., Mimura, Y., Kunert, R., Zhu, P., Wormald, M. R., Stanfield, R. L., Roux, K. H., et al. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1083182 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Sequence and structural analysis of BTB domain proteins
Stogios, P. J., Downs, G. S., Jauhal, J. J., Nandra, S. K., & Privé, G. G. (2005) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-10-r82 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
The tip of the iceberg: RNA-binding proteins with prion-like domains in neurodegenerative disease
King, O. D., Gitler, A. D., & Shorter, J. (2012) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.016 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
The power of two: protein dimerization in biology
Marianayagam, N. J., Sunde, M., & Matthews, J. M. (2004) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2004.09.006 · Cited by 596 · see citing works
A light-sensing knot revealed by the structure of the chromophore-binding domain of phytochrome
Wagner, J. R., Brunzelle, J. S., Forest, K. T., & Vierstra, R. D. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04118 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
Structural biology of bacterial iron uptake
Krewulak, K. D., & Vogel, H. J. (2007) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.07.026 · Cited by 552 · see citing works
Molecular structure of amyloid fibrils: insights from solid-state NMR
Tycko, R. (2006) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583506004173 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round <scp>XIV</scp>
Kryshtafovych, A., Schwede, T., Topf, M., Fidelis, K., & Moult, J. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26237 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
The Structure and Function of Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase
Autexier, C., & Lue, N. F. (2006) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142412 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
α-Actinin structure and regulation
Sjöblom, B., Salmazo, A., & Djinović‐Carugo, K. (2008) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-008-8080-8 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Structure and Biochemistry of Cadherins and CateninsPreprint
Shapiro, L. S., & Weis, W. I. (2009) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a003053 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Sun, Z., Diaz, Z., Fang, X., Hart, M. P., Chesi, A., Shorter, J., & Gitler, A. D. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000614 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Process of Protein Transport by the Type III Secretion System
Ghosh, P. (2004) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.68.4.771-795.2004 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Enzyme nanoarchitectonics: organization and device application
Ariga, K., Ji, Q., Mori, T., Naito, M., Yamauchi, Y., Abe, H., & Hill, J. P. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35475f · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Structure and Mechanism of Cadherins and Catenins in Cell-Cell Contacts
Pokutta, S., & Weis, W. I. (2007) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104241 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Progress towards a molecular-level structural understanding of amyloid fibrils
Tycko, R. (2004) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2003.12.002 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Regulation of Actin Cytoskeleton Dynamics in Cells
Lee, S. H., & Domínguez, R. (2010) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.1007/s10059-010-0053-8 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Protein aggregation and amyloidosis: confusion of the kinds?
Rousseau, F., Schymkowitz, J. W. H., & Serrano, L. G. (2006) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2006.01.011 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Protein oligomerization: How and why
Ali, M. H., & Imperiali, B. (2005) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2005.05.037 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Tehrani, H. S., & Moosavi‐Movahedi, A. A. (2018) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.03.001 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Zhu, J., Avakyan, N., Kakkis, A., Hoffnagle, A. M., Han, K., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Choi, T. S., Na, Y., Yu, C.-J., et al. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00308 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Anticoagulant proteins from snake venoms: structure, function and mechanism
Kini, R. M. (2006) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20060302 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Structure and Catalytic Mechanism of a SET Domain Protein Methyltransferase
Trievel, R. C., Beach, B. M., Dirk, L. M. A., Houtz, R. L., & Hurley, J. H. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01000-0 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
How to Get Insight into Amyloid Structure and Formation from Infrared Spectroscopy
Moran, S. D., & Zanni, M. T. (2014) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz500794d · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Relative Solvent Accessible Surface Area Predicts Protein Conformational Changes upon Binding
Marsh, J. A., & Teichmann, S. A. (2011) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.03.010 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution
Levy, E. D. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.028 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Crystal structure of a stable dimer reveals the molecular basis of serpin polymerization
Yamasaki, M., Li, W., Johnson, D. J. D., & Huntington, J. A. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07394 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Hänzelmann, P., & Schindelin, H. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0404624101 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Sambashivan, S., Liu, Y., Sawaya, M. R., Gingery, M., & Eisenberg, D. S. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03916 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Self-citationProtein complexes in snake venom
Doley, R., & Kini, R. M. (2009) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-009-0050-2 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Mechanism of Ubiquitin Recognition by the CUE Domain of Vps9p
Prag, G., Misra, S., Jones, E., Ghirlando, R., Davies, B. A., Horazdovsky, B. F., & Hurley, J. H. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00364-7 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Hisanaga, Y., Ago, H., Nakagawa, N., Hamada, K., Ida, K., Yamamoto, M., Hori, T., Arii, Y., Sugahara, M., Kuramitsu, S., et al. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m400100200 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Deposition Diseases and 3D Domain Swapping
Bennett, M. J., Sawaya, M. R., & Eisenberg, D. S. (2006) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2006.03.011 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Self-citationLevy, Y., Cho, S. S., Onuchic, J. N., & Wolynes, P. G. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.12.021 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
The Unfolding Story of Three-Dimensional Domain Swapping
Rousseau, F., Schymkowitz, J. W. H., & Itzhaki, L. S. (2003) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(03)00029-7 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Hepatitis A virus and the origins of picornaviruses
Wang, X., Ren, J., Gao, Q., Hu, Z., Sun, Y., Li, X., Rowlands, D. J., Yin, W., Wang, J., Stuart, D. I., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13806 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
A native to amyloidogenic transition regulated by a backbone trigger
Eakin, C. M., Berman, A. J., & Miranker, A. D. (2006) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb1068 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Protein folding in the cell: reshaping the folding funnel
Clark, P. L. (2004) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2004.08.008 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
High-affinity single-domain binding proteins with a binary-code interface
Koide, A., Gilbreth, R. N., Esaki, K., Tereshko, V. A., & Koide, S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0700149104 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Krewulak (2011) · doi:10.1139/o10-141 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Domain swapping is a consequence of minimal frustration
Yang, S., Cho, S. S., Levy, Y., Cheung, M. S., Levine, H., Wolynes, P. G., & Onuchic, J. N. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0403724101 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Protein acrobatics in pairs — dimerization via domain swapping
Gronenborn, A. M. (2009) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2008.12.002 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Amyloid fibrils from the viewpoint of protein folding
Ohnishi, S., & Takano, K. (2004) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-003-3264-8 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Gotthardt, K., Weyand, M., Kortholt, A., Haastert, P. J. M. V., & Wittinghofer, A. (2008) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.150 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
The origins and evolution of functional modules: lessons from protein complexes
Pereira‐Leal, J. B., Levy, E. D., & Teichmann, S. A. (2006) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1807 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Chen, C. P., Posy, S., Ben‐Shaul, A., Shapiro, L. S., & Honig, B. H. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0503319102 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Jayaram, H., Fan, H., Bowman, B. R., Ooi, A., Jayaram, J., Collisson, E. W., Lescar, J., & Prasad, B. V. V. (2006) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00157-06 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Proteolytic E‐cadherin activation followed by solution NMR and X‐ray crystallography
Häußinger, D., Ahrens, T., Aberle, T., Engel, J., Stetefeld, J., & Grzesiek, S. (2004) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600192 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Structural Symmetry in Membrane Proteins
Forrest, L. R. (2015) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-051013-023008 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
The Repatterning of Eukaryotic Genomes by Random Genetic Drift
Lynch, M., Bobay, L., Catania, F., Goût, J.-F., & Rho, M. (2011) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101412 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Zhong, Y., Han, L., & Ruotolo, B. T. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201403784 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Das, P., King, J. W., & Zhou, R. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1019152108 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Comparative analysis of structural properties of the C‐type‐lectin‐like domain (CTLD)
Zelensky, A. N., & Gready, J. E. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10626 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Structural Insights Into the Signal Recognition Particle
Doudna, J. A., & Batey, R. (2004) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074048 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Vasta, G. R., Ahmed, H., Lazar, M. N., Banerjee, A., Pasek, M., Shridhar, S., Guha, P., & Fernández‐Robledo, J. A. (2012) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2012.00199 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Atomic contact vectors in protein‐protein recognition
Mintseris, J., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10432 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
High-resolution design of a protein loop
Hu, X., Wang, H., Ke, H., & Kuhlman, B. A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707977104 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Sequence‐similar, structure‐dissimilar protein pairs in the PDB
Kosloff, M., & Kolodny, R. (2008) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21770 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Molecular basis for disruption of E-cadherin adhesion by botulinum neurotoxin A complex
Lee, K., Zhong, X., Gu, S., Kruel, A. M., Dorner, M. B., Perry, K., Rummel, A., Dong, M., & Jin, R. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1253823 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Casey, L. W., Lavrencic, P., Bentham, A. R., Césari, S., Ericsson, D. J., Croll, T. I., Turk, D., Anderson, P., Mark, A. E., Dodds, P. N., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1609922113 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Implications of 3D Domain Swapping for Protein Folding, Misfolding and Function
Rousseau, F., Schymkowitz, J. W. H., & Itzhaki, L. S. (2012) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3229-6_9 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Taverner, T., Hall, N. E., O’Hair, R. A. J., & Simpson, R. J. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m207370200 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Glutamine Deamidation Destabilizes Human γD-Crystallin and Lowers the Kinetic Barrier to Unfolding
Flaugh, S. L., Mills-Henry, I., & King, J. W. (2006) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m603882200 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Oligomeric Assembly of Native-like Precursors Precedes Amyloid Formation by β-2 Microglobulin
Eakin, C. M., Attenello, F. J., Morgan, C. J., & Miranker, A. D. (2004) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi049792q · Cited by 117 · see citing works
The Architecture of Outer Dynein Arms in Situ
Ishikawa, T., Sakakibara, H., & Oiwa, K. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.02.072 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Domanska, K., Vanderhaegen, S., Srinivasan, V., Pardon, E., Dupeux, F., Márquez, J. A., Giorgetti, S., Stoppini, M., Wyns, L., Bellotti, V., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1008560108 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
The Subunit Interfaces of Weakly Associated Homodimeric Proteins
Dey, S., Pal, A., Chakrabarti, P., & Janin, J. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.02.020 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Caught in self-interaction: evolutionary and functional mechanisms of protein homooligomerization
Hashimoto, K., Nishi, H., Bryant, S. H., & Panchenko, A. R. (2011) · Physical Biology · doi:10.1088/1478-3975/8/3/035007 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Thomassen, E. A. J., Gielen, G. H., Schütz, M., Schoehn, G., Abrahams, J. P., Miller, S., & van Raaij, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00755-1 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Uguzzoni, G., Lovis, S. J., Oteri, F., Schug, A. H., Szurmant, H., & Weigt, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1615068114 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Interdomain side‐chain interactions in human γD crystallin influencing folding and stability
Flaugh, S. L., Kosinski‐Collins, M. S., & King, J. W. (2005) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.051460505 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Sulzenbacher, G., Alvarez, K., van den Heuvel, R. H. H., Versluis, C., Spinelli, S., Campanacci, V., Valencia, C., Cambillau, C., Eklund, H., & Tegoni, M. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.034 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Structure of the Sec13–Sec16 edge element, a template for assembly of the COPII vesicle coat
Whittle, J. R. R., & Schwartz, T. (2010) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201003092 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Kosinski‐Collins, M. S., Flaugh, S. L., & King, J. W. (2004) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.04627004 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
The effect of shear stress on protein conformation
Stasio, E. D., & CRISTOFARO, R. D. (2010) · Biophysical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2010.07.002 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Structural basis of PcsB-mediated cell separation in Streptococcus pneumoniae
Bartual, S. G., Straume, D., Stamsås, G. A., Muñoz, I. G., Alfonso, C., Martínez-Ripoll, M., Håvarstein, L. S., & Hermoso, J. A. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4842 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Xiao, J., Chen, X., Davies, B. A., Saltiel, A. R., Katzmann, D. J., & Xu, Z. (2009) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e09-05-0403 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
García‐Álvarez, B., Bobkov, A. A., Sonnenberg, A., & de Pereda, J. M. (2003) · Structure · doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(03)00090-x · Cited by 99 · see citing works
BCL-XL Dimerization by Three-dimensional Domain Swapping
O’Neill, J., Manion, M. K., Maguire, B. C., & Hockenbery, D. M. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.11.032 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Ding, F., Nie, H., Serohijos, A. W. R., Sharma, S. K., Wilcox, K. C., Yin, S., & Dokholyan, N. V. (2007) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2007.05.014 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
RPRD1A and RPRD1B are human RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain scaffolds for Ser5 dephosphorylation
Ni, Z., Xu, C., Guo, X., Hunter, G. O., Kuznetsova, O. V., Tempel, W., Marcon, E., Zhong, G., Guo, H., Kuo, W.-H. W., et al. (2014) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2853 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Exploring folding free energy landscapes using computational protein design
Kuhlman, B. A., & Baker, D. A. (2004) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2004.01.002 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
The Structural and Dynamic Basis of Ets-1 DNA Binding Autoinhibition
Lee, G. M., Donaldson, L. W., Pufall, M. A., Kang, H.-S., Pot, I., Graves, B. J., & McIntosh, L. P. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m410722200 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Bader, R., Bamford, R., Zurdo, J., Luisi, B. F., & Dobson, C. M. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.11.034 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Structural Basis of Outer Membrane Protein Biogenesis in Bacteria
Albrecht, R., & Zeth, K. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.238931 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Proteins that bind high-mannose sugars of the HIV envelope
Botos, I., & Wlodawer, A. (2004) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.05.001 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
How synonymous mutations alter enzyme structure and function over long timescales
Jiang, Y., Neti, S. S., Sitarik, I. M., Pradhan, P., To, P., Xia, Y., Fried, S. D., Booker, S. J., & O’Brien, E. P. (2022) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41557-022-01091-z · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Crystal structure of human cystatin C stabilized against amyloid formation
Kolodziejczyk, R., Michalska, K., Hernández‐Santoyo, A., Wahlbom, M., GRUBB, A. O., & Jaskólski, M. (2010) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07596.x · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Oligomerization of bovine ribonuclease A: structural and functional features of its multimers
Libonati, M., & Gotte, G. (2004) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20031922 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Pharmacophylogenomics: genes, evolution and drug targets
Searls, D. B. (2003) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1152 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Runaway domain swapping in amyloid-like fibrils of T7 endonuclease I
Guo, Z., & Eisenberg, D. S. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0602607103 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationKinch, L. N., Shi, S.-Y., Cheng, H., Cong, Q., Pei, J.-M., Mariani, V., Schwede, T., & Grishin, N. V. (2011) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.23190 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Prion Protein and Its Conformational Conversion: A Structural Perspective
Surewicz, W. K., & Apostol, M. I. (2011) · Topics in current chemistry · doi:10.1007/128_2011_165 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
The Evolution of Multimeric Protein Assemblages
Lynch, M. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr300 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
A Dimeric Structural Scaffold for PRC2-PCL Targeting to CpG Island Chromatin
Chen, S., Jiao, L., Liu, X., Yang, X., & Liu, X. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.019 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Breydo, L., Bocharova, O. V., Makarava, N., Salnikov, V. V., Anderson, M. W., & Baskakov, I. V. (2005) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi051369+ · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Structures of SET Domain Proteins
Yeates, T. O. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01010-3 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, Y., & Eisenberg, D.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eisenberg, David
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1285-1299
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- PMC
- PMC2373619
- OpenAlex
- W2160082320
- Cited by
- 684
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction, diphtheria toxin, amyloid proteins, protein flexibility, protein structure
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Proteins, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Dimerization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review