The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modern analytical ultracentrifugation in protein science: A tutorial review
Open accessAbstract
Analytical ultracentrifugation (AU) is reemerging as a versatile tool for the study of proteins. Monitoring the sedimentation of macromolecules in the centrifugal field allows their hydrodynamic and thermodynamic characterization in solution, without interaction with any matrix or surface. The combination of new instrumentation and powerful computational software for data analysis has led to major advances in the characterization of proteins and protein complexes. The pace of new advancements makes it difficult for protein scientists to gain sufficient expertise to apply modern AU to their research problems. To address this problem, this review builds from the basic concepts to advanced approaches for the characterization of protein systems, and key computational and internet resources are provided. We will first explore the characterization of proteins by sedimentation velocity (SV). Determination of sedimentation coefficients allows for the modeling of the hydrodynamic shape of proteins and protein complexes. The computational treatment of SV data to resolve sedimenting components has been achieved. Hence, SV can be very useful in the identification of the oligomeric state and the stoichiometry of heterogeneous interactions. The second major part of the review covers sedimentation equilibrium (SE) of proteins, including membrane proteins and glycoproteins. This is the method of choice for molar mass determinations and the study of self‐association and heterogeneous interactions, such as protein–protein, protein–nucleic acid, and protein–small molecule binding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Small-molecule inhibitors of protein–protein interactions: progressing towards the dream
Arkin, M. R., & Wells, J. A. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1343 · Cited by 1,705
Hybrid Structural Model of the Complete Human ESCRT-0 Complex
Ren, X., Kloer, D. P., Kim, Y. C., Ghirlando, R., Saidi, L. F., Hummer, G., & Hurley, J. H. (2009) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2009.01.012 · Cited by 72
Gabrielson, J. P., Arthur, K. K., Stoner, M. R., Winn, B. C., Kendrick, B. S., Razinkov, V., Svitel, J., Jiang, Y., Voelker, P. J., Fernandes, C. A., et al. (2010) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ab.2009.09.036 · Cited by 56
Mitra, S., Traughber, C. A., Brannon, M. K., Gomez, S., & Capelluto, D. G. S. (2013) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m113.484170 · Cited by 46
Rolinger, L., Rüdt, M., Diehm, J., Chow-Hubbertz, J., Heitmann, M., Schleper, S., & Hubbuch, J. (2020) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-019-02318-8 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Lebowitz, J., Lewis, M. S., & Schuck, P.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2067-2079
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2163449711
- Cited by
- 777
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modern analytical ultracentrifugation in protein science: A tutorial review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1110/ps.0207702
- The paper
- Lebowitz, J., Lewis, M. S., & Schuck, P. (2002). Modern analytical ultracentrifugation in protein science: A tutorial review. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.0207702
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.