The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Ways of Thinking about Environmentalism: Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism
Abstract
A review of recent research (1988 to 1998) on gender differences in environmental attitudes and behaviors found that, contrary to past inconsistencies, a clearer picture has emerged: Women report stronger environmental attitudes and behaviors than men. Additional evidence of gender differences in environmental attitudes and behaviors was also supported across age (Study 1) and across 14 countries (Study 2). As a single variable, the effect of gender on proenvironmental behavior was consistently stronger than on environmental attitudes. Explanations for gender differences in environmentalism were examined in Study 3. It was found that compared to males, females had higher levels of socialization to be other oriented and socially responsible. Implications for theory, social action, and policy are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176 · Cited by 5,678
Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482 · Cited by 3,390
The “new environmental paradigm”
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 · Cited by 2,833
Value orientations, gender and environmental concern
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916593255002 · Cited by 2,162
Cited by
The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 · Cited by 3,037
de Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005 · Cited by 1,120
Hope and climate change: the importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people
Ojala, M. (2012) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.637157 · Cited by 988
Cross‐National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors*
Hunter, L. M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. (2004) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00239.x · Cited by 799
Clark, C. F., Kotchen, M. J., & Moore, M. R. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(02)00105-6 · Cited by 771
Metadata
- Authors
- Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P., & Aldrich, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 443-457
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2098606781
- Cited by
- 1,816
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 28.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Ways of Thinking about Environmentalism: Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0022-4537.00177
- The paper
- Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). New Ways of Thinking about Environmentalism: Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00177
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
