The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Communication Strategies in a Second Language: Definitions and Taxonomies
Abstract
This paper examines trends in second language (L2) communication strategy (CS) research to date. We give a comprehensive review of the relevant literature from the last two decades, with particular consideration of the different ways in which CSs have been defined and of corresponding influences on the organization of strategy taxonomies. We first outline the history of CS research and discuss problem‐orientedness and consciousness as defining criteria for CSs. We then offer a comprehensive list of strategic language devices and describe the major CS taxonomies, noting key trends, with special attention to current and future research orientations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wang, Z. (2014) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.5.02wan · Cited by 164
Ayedoun, E., Hayashi, Y., & Seta, K. (2019) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-018-0171-6 · Cited by 128
Viberg, O., Wasson, B., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.6494 · Cited by 58
“Communication strategies focus on managing communication problems, for example, via paraphrasing, comprehension checks, appeals for assistance (Dörnyei & Scott, 2002), socio-affective strategies (e.g., managing anxiety) and ways to enhance communication through politeness or hedging.”
BackgroundPeltonen, P. (2017) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.08.009 · Cited by 54
Ayedoun, E., Hayashi, Y., & Seta, K. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_40 · Cited by 12
Sánchez-García, D. (2019) · CLIL. Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education · doi:10.5565/rev/clil.28 · Cited by 11
Peltonen, P., & Lintunen, P. (2024) · AFinLA-teema · doi:10.30660/afinla.136027 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Dörnyei, Z., & Scott, M. L.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 173-210
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W2094084265
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
