The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correlates of Household Seismic Hazard Adjustment Adoption
Abstract
This study examined the relationships of self‐reported adoption of 12 seismic hazard adjustments (pre‐impact actions to reduce danger to persons and property) with respondents' demographic characteristics, perceived risk, perceived hazard knowledge, perceived protection responsibility, and perceived attributes of the hazard adjustments. Consistent with theoretical predictions, perceived attributes of the hazard adjustments differentiated among the adjustments and had stronger correlations with adoption than any of the other predictors. These results identify the adjustments and attributes that emergency managers should address to have the greatest impact on improving household adjustment to earthquake hazard.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In both studies, respondents rate themselves as most responsible for their personal safety, with government officials considered the next most responsible, and the media, one's peers, and one's friends rated as least responsible.”
From Household preparedness motivation in lahar hazard zones: assessing the adoption of preparedness behaviors among laypeople and response professionals in communities downstream from Mount Baker and Glacier Peak (USA) volcanoes (2017) · cites this paper as Lindell and Whitney (2000)
In the citing paper
“These studies find significant positive correlations between feelings of personal responsibility and preparedness behaviors among university students in Los Angeles (Lindell and Whitney 2000) and California and Washington residents (Arlikatti et al. 2007).”
From Household preparedness motivation in lahar hazard zones: assessing the adoption of preparedness behaviors among laypeople and response professionals in communities downstream from Mount Baker and Glacier Peak (USA) volcanoes (2017) · cites this paper as Lindell and Whitney 2000
In the citing paper
“Our findings agree with those of previous studies related to the adoption of seismic hazard adjustments (Lindell and Whitney 2000;Lindell and Perry 2000;Arlikatti et al. 2007).”
From Household preparedness motivation in lahar hazard zones: assessing the adoption of preparedness behaviors among laypeople and response professionals in communities downstream from Mount Baker and Glacier Peak (USA) volcanoes (2017) · cites this paper as Lindell and Whitney 2000
In the citing paper
“demonstrate that high perceived response-efficacy is helpful, perhaps necessary, for motivating the adoption of hazard adjustments.”
From Household preparedness motivation in lahar hazard zones: assessing the adoption of preparedness behaviors among laypeople and response professionals in communities downstream from Mount Baker and Glacier Peak (USA) volcanoes (2017) · cites this paper as Lindell and Whitney 2000
In the citing paper
“These three studies (Lindell and Whitney 2000;Lindell and Prater 2002;Terpstra and Lindell 2012) find that perceived response-efficacy significantly and positively influences the adoption of preparedness intentions and behaviors.”
From Household preparedness motivation in lahar hazard zones: assessing the adoption of preparedness behaviors among laypeople and response professionals in communities downstream from Mount Baker and Glacier Peak (USA) volcanoes (2017) · cites this paper as Lindell and Whitney 2000
2 more claims about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Citations
Cited by
The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence
Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x · Cited by 1,868
Self-citationHoffmann, R., & Muttarak, R. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.016 · Cited by 439
Corwin, K. A., Brand, B. D., Hubbard, M. L., & Johnston, D. M. (2017) · Journal of Applied Volcanology · doi:10.1186/s13617-017-0055-8 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J.
- Venue
- Risk Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-26
- ISSN
- 0272-4332
- 1539-6924
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
