Cited by 439Disaster Management and ResilienceEarthquake and Disaster Impact StudiesFlood Risk Assessment and Management

Learn from the Past, Prepare for the Future: Impacts of Education and Experience on Disaster Preparedness in the Philippines and Thailand

Open access
Hoffmann, Roman, Muttarak, Raya·2017·World Development

Abstract

This study aims at understanding the role of education in promoting disaster preparedness. Strengthening resilience to climate-related hazards is an urgent target of Goal 13 of the Sustainable Development Goals. Preparing for a disaster such as stockpiling of emergency supplies or having a family evacuation plan can substantially minimize loss and damages from natural hazards. However, the levels of household disaster preparedness are often low even in disaster-prone areas. Focusing on determinants of personal disaster preparedness, this paper investigates: (1) pathways through which education enhances preparedness; and (2) the interplay between education and experience in shaping preparedness actions. Data analysis is based on face-to-face surveys of adults aged ≥15 years in Thailand (N = 1,310) and the Philippines (N = 889, female only). Controlling for socio-demographic and contextual characteristics, we find that formal education raises the propensity to prepare against disasters. Using the KHB method to further decompose the education effects, we find that the effect of education on disaster preparedness is mainly mediated through social capital and disaster risk perception in Thailand whereas there is no evidence that education is mediated through observable channels in the Philippines. This suggests that the underlying mechanisms explaining the education effects are highly context-specific. Controlling for the interplay between education and disaster experience, we show that education raises disaster preparedness only for those households that have not been affected by a disaster in the past. Education improves abstract reasoning and anticipation skills such that the better educated undertake preventive measures without needing to first experience the harmful event and then learn later. In line with recent efforts of various UN agencies in promoting education for sustainable development, this study provides a solid empirical evidence showing positive externalities of education in disaster risk reduction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.016

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individual disaster preparedness is a key aspect of resilience in low- and middle-income countries.

    “Individual disaster preparedness is a key aspect of resilience in low- and middle-income countries (Hoffmann and Muttarak 2017), where rescue and disaster management systems often do not have sufficient capacities for immediate and efficient disaster response.”

    From Disaster preparedness and resilience at household level in Yangon, Myanmar (2022) · cites this paper as Hoffmann and Muttarak 2017

  • This result exceeds numbers from the Philippines and Thailand, where 50% and only 14.4% of the population stockpile food, as well as from Hong Kong, where 57.3% store food.

    “This result exceeds numbers from, e.g. the Philippines and Thailand, where 50% and only 14.4% of the population stockpile food (Hoffmann and Muttarak 2017), as well as from Hong Kong, where 57.3% store food (Tam et al. 2018).”

    From Disaster preparedness and resilience at household level in Yangon, Myanmar (2022) · cites this paper as Hoffmann and Muttarak 2017

    The passages returned from the indexed copy are bibliographic entries, not findings about food stockpiling. Searches for “14.4%,” “stockpile food,” and the Philippines and Thailand percentages found no passage verifying the two figures attributed to Hoffmann and Muttarak. The Hong Kong figure is attached to a different citation and is not part of this verdict. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies have pointed out the positive impact on disaster preparedness of formal education, such as in nursery schools, schools and universities, and informal education, such as community-based methods to reduce disaster risks.

    “In fact, studies have pointed out the positive impact on disaster preparedness of formal education, such as in nursery schools, schools and universities (Hoffmann and Muttarak 2017), and informal education, such as community-based methods to reduce disaster risks (Allen 2006; Maskrey 2011).”

    From Disaster preparedness and resilience at household level in Yangon, Myanmar (2022) · cites this paper as Hoffmann and Muttarak 2017

    The searches for formal education, schooling, and disaster preparedness returned only the paper’s abstract and metadata, not a passage from its full text. Under the specified evidence rule, those results cannot establish what the paper says about formal education in nursery schools, schools, or universities. The informal-education clause is attributed to other sources and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.65)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffmann, R., & Muttarak, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Venue
World Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
96
Pages
32-51
ISSN
0305-750X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2604494705
Cited by
439
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5
FWCI
63.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ePubWU Institutional Repository (Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Austrian Science Fund (Z 171)
  • Chulalongkorn University (RES560530150-CC)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (230195)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Keywords
disaster preparedness, education, disaster experience, social capital, disaster risk perception, climate resilience, disaster risk reduction, household preparedness, mediation analysis, Philippines, Thailand, SDG 13

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review