The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring and assessing resilience: broadening understanding through multiple disciplinary perspectives
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Increased interest in managing resilience has led to efforts to develop standardized tools for assessments and quantitative measures. Resilience, however, as a property of complex adaptive systems, does not lend itself easily to measurement. Whereas assessment approaches tend to focus on deepening understanding of system dynamics, resilience measurement aims to capture and quantify resilience in a rigorous and repeatable way. We discuss the strengths, limitations and trade‐offs involved in both assessing and measuring resilience, as well as the relationship between the two. We use a range of disciplinary perspectives to draw lessons on distilling complex concepts into useful metrics. Measuring and monitoring a narrow set of indicators or reducing resilience to a single unit of measurement may block the deeper understanding of system dynamics needed to apply resilience thinking and inform management actions. Synthesis and applications. Resilience assessment and measurement can be complementary. In both cases it is important that: (i) the approach aligns with how resilience is being defined, (ii) the application suits the specific context and (iii) understanding of system dynamics is increased. Ongoing efforts to measure resilience would benefit from the integration of key principles that have been identified for building resilience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sen, A. (2009) · Rugman Reviews · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-28787-8_94 · Cited by 15,837
Clapp, J., & Sen, A. (1999) · International Journal · doi:10.2307/40203469 · Cited by 13,411
Systems Thinking, Systems Practice
Checkland, P. B. (1981) · Cumulative Index of Computer Aided Architectural Design · Cited by 6,256
Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness
Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6 · Cited by 5,476
Social and ecological resilience: are they related?
Adger, W. N. (2000) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/030913200701540465 · Cited by 4,825
(2002) · Cited by 3,806
Systems thinking, systems practice
(1982) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(82)90206-5 · Cited by 3,545
From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What?
Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., & Abel, N. (2001) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9 · Cited by 3,496
Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management
(1980) · Forest Science · doi:10.1093/forestscience/26.3.435 · Cited by 3,222
The complexity and stability of ecosystems
Pimm, S. L. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/307321a0 · Cited by 3,057
Cited by
Folke, C. (2016) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09088-210444 · Cited by 982
A framework to assess the resilience of farming systems
Meuwissen, M. P. M., Feindt, P. H., Spiegel, A., Termeer, C. J. A. M., Mathijs, E., Mey, Y. D., Finger, R., Balmann, A., Wauters, E., Urquhart, J., et al. (2019) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102656 · Cited by 783
Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere
Folke, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Galaz, V., Westley, F., Lamont, M., Scheffer, M., Österblom, H., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., et al. (2021) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-021-01544-8 · Cited by 696
Systemic resilience: principles and processes for a science of change in contexts of adversity
Ungar, M. (2018) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-10385-230434 · Cited by 441
Ecological resilience: what to measure and how
Dakos, V., & Kéfi, S. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac5767 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Quinlan, A. E., Berbés‐Blázquez, M., Haider, L. J., & Peterson, G. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-11-11
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 677-687
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2154773800
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 23.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring and assessing resilience: broadening understanding through multiple disciplinary perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2664.12550
- The paper
- Quinlan, A. E., Berbés‐Blázquez, M., Haider, L. J., & Peterson, G. D. (2016). Measuring and assessing resilience: broadening understanding through multiple disciplinary perspectives. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12550
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.