Cited by 22Technology Adoption and User BehaviourTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationVoice and Speech Disorders

Factors influencing US speech and language therapists’ use of technology for clinical practice

Albudoor, Nahar, Peña, Elizabeth D.·2021·International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders

Abstract

Background There is an increasing number of technological resources available to speech and language therapists (SLTs) for use in clinical practice, but the factors that influence SLTs' selection and use of such resources are not well understood. In related fields, technology acceptance models have been employed to explain users' adoption of technology and to inform the advancement of empirically supported technological resources. Aims To determine the factors that influence SLTs' use of technology for clinical practice by testing a model of their technology acceptance and use. Methods & procedures We surveyed 209 practising SLTs in the United States representative of the speech and language membership of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). Participants completed a 38-item electronic survey representing four categories: (1) technology use, (2) technology attitudes and factors influencing technology use, (3) employment information and (4) demographics. Items measuring technology attitudes served as indicators of the research model, which mapped the primary relationships of a technology acceptance model. Survey data were collected before the Covid-19 pandemic. Outcomes & results The research model accounted for 66% of the variance in SLTs' behavioural intention to use technology, which significantly and positively predicted the amount of time they reportedly spent using technology in the workplace. Subjective norms and attitudes towards technology use direc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1460-6984.12614

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albudoor, N., & Peña, E. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Albudoor, Nahar
Venue
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-19
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
567-582
ISSN
  • 1368-2822 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-6984
OpenAlex
W3136369887
Cited by
22
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
speech-language pathologists, technology acceptance, attitudes toward technology, behavioral intention, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, subjective norms, technology adoption, speech-language pathology practice, telepractice
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Allied Health Personnel, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Language Therapy, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Speech Therapy, Technology, United States, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review