Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teachers who believe that using technology would enhance their job performance put more emphasis on developing their students' ICT literacy.
“teachers who believe that using technology would enhance their job performance (i.e., perceived usefulness; Teo, 2011) put more emphasis on developing their students' ICT literacy.”
From Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students' ICT literacy (2016) · cites this paper as Teo, 2011
The technology acceptance model (TAM) aims to identify the level of teachers' acceptance of ICT and predict to what extent they are prepared to teach with ICT.
“This model aims to identify the level of teachers' acceptance of ICT and hence predict to what extent they are prepared to teach with ICT.”
From Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students' ICT literacy (2016) · cites this paper as Teo, 2011
Perceived enjoyment is a component of perceived benefits in the VAM.
“While perceived usefulness plays a crucial role in providing functional advantages, perceived enjoyment is equally vital for its emotional benefits, as outlined by Teo [33].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
AI adoption is not merely a personal decision, but one shaped by interpersonal trust networks and institutional enablers.
“These findings emphasize that AI adoption is not merely a personal decision, but one shaped by interpersonal trust networks and institutional enablers, aligning with Teo (2011) [73], Zhao & Frank (2003) [74].”
From From Perception to Practice: Artificial Intelligence as a Pathway to Enhancing Digital Literacy in Higher Education Teaching (2025) · cites this paper as Teo (2011) [73]
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314 · see citing works
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190 · see citing works
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788 · see citing works
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,588 · see citing works
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,406 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035 · see citing works
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,065 · see citing works
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,385 · see citing works
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737 · see citing works
(1998) · Cited by 36,049 · see citing works
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709 · see citing works
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,471 · see citing works
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116 · see citing works
Multivariate data analysis : a global perspective
Hair, J. F. (2010) · Cited by 12,258 · see citing works
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970 · see citing works
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815 · see citing works
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling: Fourth Edition
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315749105 · Cited by 6,604 · see citing works
Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249688 · Cited by 6,553 · see citing works
(2005) · Cited by 6,097 · see citing works
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling
Finkelstein, D. (2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s328 · Cited by 6,087 · see citing works
Measures of Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis with Applications
Mardia, K. V. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.3.519 · Cited by 4,859 · see citing works
Davis, F. D. (1993) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1006/imms.1993.1022 · Cited by 4,754 · see citing works
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250 · see citing works
Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization1
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249443 · Cited by 3,814 · see citing works
Structural equations with latent variables
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-0974 · Cited by 2,177 · see citing works
Park, S. Y. (2009) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 1,385 · see citing works
Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment
Pelgrum, W. J. (2001) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(01)00045-8 · Cited by 1,189 · see citing works
Yi, M. Y., Jackson, J. D., Park, J. S., & Probst, J. C. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006 · Cited by 1,139 · see citing works
Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers
Teo, T. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006 · Cited by 1,009 · see citing works
Self-citationEmpirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM
Ngai, E. W. T., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. C. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.007 · Cited by 813 · see citing works
An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008) · doi:10.4324/9780203809532 · Cited by 716 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The Mardia's coefficient (Mardia, 1970) for the data in this study was 402.35, which is lower than the value of 440 computed based on the formula p(p+2) where p equals the number of observed variables in the model (Raykov & Marcoulides, 2008).”
MethodInfluentialA beginner's guide to structural equation modeling, 3rd ed.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010) · Cited by 698 · see citing works
Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study
Hu, P. J., Clark, T. H. K., & Ma, W. W. K. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(03)00050-8 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Teo, T. P., & Noyes, J. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.002 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Self-citationA review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers.
Jones, A. (2004) · Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London) · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Pre-service teachers' attitudes towards computer use: A Singapore survey
Teo, T. P. (2008) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1201 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Self-citationTeo, T. P., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., & Wong, S. L. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.017 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Self-citationTHONG, J. Y. L., HONG, W., & TAM, K.-Y. (2002) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(02)91024-4 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Papagianni, A. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.006 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Examining teachers' decisions to adopt new technology
Sugar, W. A., Crawley, F. E., & Fine, B. (2004) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Managing Teachers’ Barriers to ICT Integration in Singapore Schools
Lim, C. P., & Khine, M. S. (2006) · Australasian Journal of Paramedicine · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Explaining the intention to use technology among student teachers
Teo, T. P., & Lee, C. B. (2010) · Campus-Wide Information Systems · doi:10.1108/10650741011033035 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Self-citationMediating the impact of technology usage on perceived ease of use by anxiety
Saadé, R. G., & Kira, D. (2006) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.009 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Bringing academics on board: Encouraging institution-wide diffusion of e-learning environments
Birch, D., & Burnett, B. (2009) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1184 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Roberts, P., & Henderson, R. D. (2000) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/s0953-5438(98)00068-x · Cited by 137 · see citing works
The Relationship between Educational Ideologies and Technology Acceptance in Pre-Service Teachers
Kiraz, E., & Ozdemir, D. (2006) · Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University AVESIS · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Understanding Technology Acceptance in Pre-Service Teachers: A Structural-Equation Modeling Approach
Teo, T. P., & Schalk, P. V. (2009) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.3860/taper.v18i1.1035 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationPredicting customer behavior in the market-space: a study of Rayport and Sviokla’s framework
Lu, H., & Lin, J. C. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00131-8 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Technology Acceptance Predictors among Student Teachers and Experienced Classroom Teachers
Smarkola, C. (2007) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/j3gm-3rk1-2907-7u03 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Tsai, P.-S., Tsai, C., & Hwang, G. (2010) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1076 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Teo, T. P. (2010) · ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review
Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-09-2014-0088 · Cited by 1,339 · see citing works
“…opinion Carter and Schaupp (2009), Chan et al. (2010), Chiu et al. (2010), Chiu and Wang (2008), Sahu and Gupta (2007), Schaupp et al. (2010), Teo (2011) No moderating variables 6 No moderating variables used Al-Sobhi et al. (2011), Chen et al. (2008), Huser et al. (2010), Loo et al. (2009),…”
BackgroundInfluentialRaza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633120960421 · Cited by 510 · see citing works
“According to Teo (2011), technology acceptance is the willingness of an individual to adopt the use of technology for facilitating task performance based on the support it was designed to provide.”
BackgroundElkaseh, A., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2015) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.683 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Pan, X. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
“Using this theory and analysis method, later in the educational landscape, there were studies that verified and explained the intention of students’ technology use (Teo, 2011) and the research of students’ independent use of technology for language learning (Lai, 2013), etc.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialUnpacking teachers’ intentions to integrate technology: A meta-analysis
Scherer, R., & Teo, T. (2019) · Educational Research and Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.001 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Self-citationOkay, Google!: An empirical study on voice assistants on consumer engagement and loyalty
Moriuchi, E. (2019) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21192 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Jang, J., Ko, Y., Shin, W. S., & Han, I. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3048708 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
“technology is easy to use [66] and useful for instruction [79], [91].”
BackgroundResultAcceptance and use of lecture capture system (LCS) in executive business studies
Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A. J.-C., Ayupp, K., Radović-Marković, M. M., & Ali, S. (2017) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-06-2016-0015 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
“(2015), UTAUT is one of the extensively used models for testing the acceptance and use of various technologies in a number of different studies (e.g. Farooq et al., 2016; Ketterl et al., 2011; Nair et al., 2015; Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodSánchez‐Prieto, J. C., Migueláñéz, S. O., & García‐Peñalvo, F. J. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Siddiq, F., Scherer, R., & Tondeur, J. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.006 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.003 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
“M Perceived ease of use also qualifies as a critical predictor of technology adoption (Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundWatty, K., McKay, J., & Ngo, L. (2016) · Journal of Accounting Education · doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.03.003 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Teo, T. P., & Zhou, M. (2014) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-014-9080-3 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
“Recent studies have provided evidence to show that perceived usefulness has influences on attitudes and intention to use technology (Teo 2008, 2011; Yuen 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-citationChu, T.-H., & Chen, Y. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.013 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility!
Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
A Technology Acceptance Model Survey of the Metaverse Prospects
Aburbeian, A. M., Owda, A. Y., & Owda, M. (2022) · Applied Informatics · doi:10.3390/ai3020018 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
“Table 2 shows that there is a negative correlation, weak positive correlation and moderate positive correlations between variables.”
BackgroundFactors Impacting Teachers’ Adoption of Mobile Learning
Callum, K. M., Jeffrey, L. M., & Kinshuk, N. A. (2014) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/1970 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
“Other studies have shown that anxiety about computer use will negatively influence an individual’s use and adoption of ICT in their teaching and learning (Phelps & Ellis, 2002; Teo, 2011; Wilfong, 2006).”
BackgroundTartavulea, C. V., Albu, C. N., Albu, N., Dieaconescu, R. I., & Petre, S. (2020) · Amfiteatru Economic · doi:10.24818/ea/2020/55/920 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
“The nature of the teaching and learning processes changes with the use of e-technologies (Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundBackfisch, I., Lachner, A., Hische, C., Loose, F., & Scheiter, K. (2020) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101300 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Explaining the intention to use technology among student teachers
Teo, T. P., & Lee, C. B. (2010) · Campus-Wide Information Systems · doi:10.1108/10650741011033035 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Self-citationScherer, R., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.012 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
“Second, self-efficacy beliefs are important determinants for teachers’ intention to use and integrate technology for teaching and learning (Scherer, Siddiq, & Teo, 2015; Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundLachner, A., Fabian, A., Franke, U., Preiß, J., Jacob, L., Führer, C., Küchler, U., Paravicini, W., Randler, C., & Thomas, P. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104304 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
The Influence of Values on E-learning Adoption
Mehta, A., Morris, N. P., Swinnerton, B. J., & Homer, M. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103617 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
“The direct e ff ect of social in fl uence on learner intention was non-signi fi cant supporting prior literature (Teo, 2011; Terzis & Economides, 2011) and meta-analysis (Taiwo & Downe, 2013).”
ResultChiu, Y.-T., Zhu, Y., & Corbett, J. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102379 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.005 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
“…Ainley, 2013; Kikis, Scheuermann,& Villalba, 2009); and teachers' integration of ICT in classrooms on the other hand (Donnelly, McGarr, & O'Reilly, 2011; Hern andez-Ramos, Martínez-Abad, GarcíaPe~nalvo, HerreraGarcía, & Rodríguez-Conde, 2014; Sang, Valcke, van Braak, & Tondeur, 2010; Teo, 2011a).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationRevisiting teachers’ computer self-efficacy: A differentiated view on gender differences
Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.038 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Factors impacting special education teachers’ acceptance and actual use of technology
Siyam, N. (2019) · Education and Information Technologies : Official Journal of the IFIP technical committee on Education · doi:10.1007/s10639-018-09859-y · Cited by 136 · see citing works
“Teachers are considered key players in the effective integration of technology in teaching and learning (Zhao et al. 2001; Teo 2011a).”
BackgroundTechnology acceptance among pre-service teachers: Does gender matter?
Teo, T. P., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2015) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1672 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
“More recently, educational researchers (e.g., Teo, 2011; Teo, 2012; Teo & Wong, 2013) have extended TAM into education settings, investigating the issues in technology acceptance and use among school teachers.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLiu, H., Lin, C., & Zhang, D. (2017) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1347572 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
“The questionnaire was a version of those used by Teo (2011) and Chan and Elliott (2004), modi fi ed to suit the special circum-stances of the language teachers who participated in the current study.”
MethodWong, K., Teo, T. P., & Russo, S. G. (2012) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.796 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“Many reports provide evidence of the impact of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on attitude toward usage and behavioural intention (Rasimah et al., 2011; Teo, 2011; Wong & Teo, 2009; Sumak, Hericko, Pusnik & Polancic, 2011).”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationThe strategic influence of school principal leadership in the digital transformation of schools
Nalda, F. N., Emeterio, M. C. S., Fernández-Ortiz, R., & Arias-Oliva, M. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106481 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Interactive Whiteboard Acceptance: Applicability of the UTAUT Model to Student Teachers
Wong, K., Teo, T. P., & Russo, S. G. (2012) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-012-0001-9 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
“Furthermore, many past empirical studies have used behavioural intention in explaining technology acceptance amongst student teachers (Teo 2011; Teo and Noyes 2011; Terzis and Econo-mides 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWang, K., Ruan, Q., Zhang, X., Fu, C., & Duan, B. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14050373 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
“…teachers’ instructional methods may face obstacles due to a range of challenges, including external factors such as insufficient support, a lack of essential technical resources, and curricular constraints, as well as internal factors like insufficient technical skills or low self-efficacy [17–19].”
BackgroundSánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.002 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
“, 2003) and it has yielded good results in previous studies on teachers’ and students’ technology acceptance (Deshpande et al., 2012; Echeng et al., 2013; Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundResultTeachers and technology: development of an extended theory of planned behavior
Teo, T. P., Zhou, M., & Noyes, J. (2016) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9446-5 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
“It was possible that experienced teachers did not have to rely on institutional mandate (e.g., school principal or department head) to decide whether or not to use technology (Robert and Henderson 2000; Teo 2011).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationKabooha, R. H., & Elyas, T. (2018) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v11n2p72 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Sanusi, I. T., Ayanwale, M. A., & Tolorunleke, A. E. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100202 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Kim, J., & Lee, K. S.-S. (2020) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2020.1776213 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
“…based on the studies conducted by Venkatesh et al. (2003), who used the UTAUT model to explore the acceptance of technologies; it was also based on studies conducted on the acceptance of digital learning technologies by teachers, such as OECD (2019c), Zalah (2018) and Teo (2011) (see Table 1).”
MethodÇiğdem, H., & Topçu, A. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.049 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Teo, T. P. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633117749430 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationNunes, A., Cordeiro, C., Limpo, T., & Castro, S. L. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12635 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
“Teachers are key players to foster the effective use of technology for learning and instruction and stimulate students' acceptance of technology (Davidson et al., 2014; Roscoe et al., 2017; Teo, 2011).”
Han, I., Shin, W. S., & Ko, Y. (2017) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1322057 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Liao, Y.-K., Wu, W.-Y., Le, T. Q., & Phung, T. T. T. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14020815 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
“Besides, while PU plays an important role in the utilitarian dimension of PV, PE is an essential dimension in e-learning users’ perception of hedonic PV [44].”
BackgroundTeo, T. P. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.015 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citationAl-Abdullatif, A. M., & Alsubaie, M. A. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14090845 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“While perceived usefulness plays a crucial role in providing functional advantages, perceived enjoyment is equally vital for its emotional benefits, as outlined by Teo [33].”
Wong, K., Osman, R., Goh, P. S. C., & Rahmat, M. K. (2013) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2016) · International Journal of Research in Education and Science · doi:10.21890/ijres.81048 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
“As argued by Teo (2011), teachers’ positive attitudes towards the use of computers reinforce their intentions to use technology.”
BackgroundUnderstanding teacher technology integration from expectancy-value perspectives
Cheng, S.-L., Lu, L., Xie, K., & Vongkulluksn, V. W. (2020) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103062 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Scherer, R., Rohatgi, A., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.034 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“Prior research has shown that the integration of ICT depends, to a large extent, on student and teachers attitudes towards their ICT use (Hatlevik, Ottestad, & Throndsen, 2015; Mama & Hennessy, 2013; Prestridge, 2012; Sang, Valcke, Braak, & Tondeur, 2010; Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundA test-based approach of Modeling and Measuring Technological Pedagogical Knowledge
Lachner, A., Backfisch, I., & Stürmer, K. (2019) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103645 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Chou, C.-M., Shen, C.-H., Hsiao, H.-C., & Shen, T.-C. (2019) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2018.1520201 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
“The results of this study were consistent with those of Teo (2011) and Hernandez-Ramos et al. (2014), who suggested that individual creativity is generated by identifying with an organizational environment.”
BackgroundResultTeo, T. P., & Milutinović, V. (2015) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1668 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“This finding is consistent with recent studies that examined the influence of attitudes towards computer use among pre-service teachers in other countries (Teo, 2009, 2011; Yuen & Ma, 2008).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationThongsri, N., Shen, L., & Bao, Y. (2019) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2019.1585904 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“For this reason, the study through the intention to use elearning variable has several advantages due to actual use possibly having several causes and delicate factors, which may not result in a comprehensive study (Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundAl‐Adwan, A. S., Meet, R. K., Anand, S., Shukla, G. P., Alsharif, R., & Dabbaghia, M. N. (2024) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2343955 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“This is because the affordances of educational technologies cannot be fully realized if educators do not implement these tools in intended pedagogically sound ways (Teo 2011).”
Huang, Y. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.010 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Teachers’ motivation to adopt technology in higher education
Sharma, L., & Srivastava, M. (2019) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-07-2018-0156 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Ursavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., & Bakır-Yalçın, E. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12834 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Batucan, G., Gonzales, G. G., Balbuena, M. G., Pasaol, K. R. B., Seno, D. N., & Gonzales, R. R. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.768831 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
“Teo (2011) viewed technology acceptance as a person’s willingness to embrace technology to facilitate tasks based on the support it intends to provide.”
BackgroundAl-Abdullatif, A. M. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13111151 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Bao, Y., Xiong, T., Hu, Z., & Kibelloh, M. (2013) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.49.1.e · Cited by 103 · see citing works
“All the ten model-fit measures of the proposed structural model were the same as those of the measure model, indicating a good model fit.”
MethodResultThe influence of teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning on their technology acceptance
Teo, T. P., & Zhou, M. (2016) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2016.1143844 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
“Ranging from three to fi ve items per factor, these items were adapted from published sources that displayed high reliability when the former were used with in-service or pre-service teachers (Teo, 2011, 2014; Teo & van Schaik, 2009; Wong & Teo, 2009; Wong, Teo, & Russo, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationValtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Mäkitalo, K., Hoang, N. Y., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöntinen, S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12353 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“Birch & Irvine, 2009; Teo, 2011; Teo & Tan,2012; Valtonen et al., 2015).”
The behavioral intentions of Hong Kong primary teachers in adopting educational technology
Wong, G. K. W. (2016) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9426-9 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
“Based on Teo (2011) for instance, five significant constructs are included in the modeling of in-service teachers’ behavioral intention to use technology: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude towards computer use, subjective norm, and facilitating conditions.”
BackgroundLiu, H., Wang, L., & Koehler, M. J. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12824 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Leem, J., & Sung, E. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12612 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Khong, T. D. H., Çelik, İ., Le, T. T. T., Lai, V. T. T., Nguyen, A., & Bui, H. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11417-6 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
“This finding is in line with TAM while similar Education and Information Technologies (2023) 28:5999–6026 results were reported in previous studies about teachers’ technology adoption (Joo et al., 2018; Khlaif et al., 2022; Scherer et al., 2019; Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDeterminants of Teachers’ Attitudes Towards E-Learning in Tanzanian Higher Learning Institutions
Kisanga, S. E. (2016) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2720 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“Technology, which is believed to be both important and personally relevant, is more likely to create people’s positive attitude towards it (Rogers 2003; Teo 2011).”
BackgroundSun, P. P., & Mei, B. (2020) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1750430 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
“Technology acceptance research Teo (2011) defines technology acceptance as “ a user ’ s willingness to employ technology for the tasks it is designed to support ” (p. 1).”
BackgroundThe Acceptance of Telepresence Robots in Higher Education
Lei, M., Clemente, I. M., Liu, H., & Bell, J. E. (2022) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-021-00837-y · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“The items for use intention were adapted from Teo’s study [93].”
MethodÇiğdem, H., & Öztürk, M. (2016) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2253 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
“While perceived ease of use exerts a direct impact on perceived usefulness, perceived usefulness together with perceived ease of use influences attitudes toward usage (Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundLi, R., Meng, Z., Tian, M., Zhang, Z., Ni, C., & Wei, X. L. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1540433 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
“Items regarding four constructs of TAM were adopted based on the questionnaire developed by Huang (2016) and Teo (2011), including PEU (e.g. ‘ I think that pigaiwang is easy to use ’ ), PU (e.g. ‘ Using pigaiwang , I can write much better ’ ), ATU (e.g. ‘ I like using pigaiwang to assist me in…”
MethodMartín‐García, A. V., Abad, F. M., & Reyes‐González, D. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12831 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Doğan, S., Dogan, N., & Çelik, İ. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10310-4 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
“In many studies, perceived usefulness has been found to be the strongest factor directly affecting attitudes and intention to use ICT (Chien et al. 2014; Oye et al. 2014; Teo 2011).”
BackgroundChen, S., Liu, S.-C., Li, S.-H., & Yen, D. C. (2013) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-013-9981-0 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
“Additionally, PU has a significant impact on outcome variables [35, 51, 54], and PEOU has a direct and decisive impact on PU [49, 55].”
BackgroundBreakdowns in children's interactions with a robotic tutor: A longitudinal study
Serholt, S. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.030 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Konstantinidou, E., & Scherer, R. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104424 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Panagoulias, D. P., Virvou, M. K., & Tsihrintzis, G. A. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123375 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Teachers’ technology use for teaching: Comparing two explanatory mechanisms
Backfisch, I., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Lachner, A., & Scheiter, K. (2021) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103390 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Panagoulias, D. P., Sarmas, E., Marinakis, V., Virvou, M. K., Tsihrintzis, G. A., & Doukas, H. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12214430 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Although not directly focused on technology literacy, research studies such as [48] investigate the relationship between computer self-efficacy, facilitating conditions, and perceived usefulness, which may be related to technology literacy.”
Understanding perceptions of academics toward technology acceptance in accounting education
Al‐Hattami, H. M. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13141 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
“This result is consistent with [19,33,37,38], and [17].”
BackgroundResultPredictors of Technology Integration Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Preservice Teachers
Birişçi, S., & Kul, Ü. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cet.512537 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“It is possible to accept the self-efficacy beliefs of teachers in the context of technology integration is related to the necessity of including technological skills within the scope of educational activities (Albion, 1999; Chen, 2008; Ertmer, 2005; Ruggiero & Mong, 2015; Teo, 2011).”
BackgroundHatlevik, I. K. R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.022 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Al‐Debei, M. M., Jalal, D., & Al-Lozi, E. M. (2013) · International Journal of Business Information Systems · doi:10.1504/ijbis.2013.055555 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Three items of these five were based on the measures of behavioural intention as defined by Teo (2011), and these measures are: the intention to continue using a technology in the future, the expectation to use a technology in the future, and the planning to use a technology in the future.”
Multi-expert and multi-criteria evaluation of Online Education Factors: A fuzzy AHP approach
Kukreja, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021) · Journal of Engineering Education/Journal of engineering education transformations/Journal of engineering education transformation · doi:10.16920/jeet/2021/v35i2/22081 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“The authors (Teo, 2011 (Kearns, 2012).”
Students' Acceptance of Tablet PCs in the Classroom
Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2016) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2016.1215172 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Although previous studies have been conducted on technology acceptance among classroom teachers (Ifenthaler & Schweinbenz, 2013; Teo, 2011), preservice teachers (Cullen & Greene, 2011; Teo, 2009; Teo, Lee, & Chai, 2008), and in higher education in general (El-Gayar et al., 2011; Moran, Hawkes, &…”
Achieving continued usage in online banking: a post-adoption study
Oertzen, A.-S., & Odekerken‐Schröder, G. (2019) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-09-2018-0239 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“Customers ’ attitudes influence their intentions to use a digitalised service, as well as their behavioural use (Davis et al. , 1989; Sreejesh et al. , 2016; Teo, 2011; Venkatesh and Davis, 2000).”
BackgroundXie, K., Nelson, M. J., Cheng, S., & Jiang, Z. (2021) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2021.1951404 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“…value beliefs as a global construct that encompasses belief factors used in the literature including perceived enjoyment, perceived importance, perceived usefulness, and any combination of these dimensions (Ottenbreit-Leftwich et al., 2010; Scherer et al., 2019; Teo, 2011; Wozney et al., 2006).”
BackgroundDiño, M. J. S., & de Guzman, A. B. (2014) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601277.2014.917236 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“…& Mazza, 2013; McKenna, Tuunanen, & Gardner, 2013; Chong, 2013); education (e.g., Ersoy & Akbulut, 2014; Ho, Hung & Chen, 2013; Huang, Hood, & Yoo, 2013; Teo, 2011); and mobile computing (e.g., Nikou & Bouwman, 2014; Shafinah, Sahari, Sulaiman, Yusoff, & Ikram, 2013; Fuksa, 2013), among others.”
MethodChen, C.-P. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.015 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Dalvi‐Esfahani, M., Leong, L. W., Ibrahim, O., & Nilashi, M. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633118805211 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“…important in motivating students’ behavioral intention toward the use of e-learning (Baker et al., 2007; Sawang et al., 2014), while in the study by Teo (2011), the author reported that the impact of subjective norm on teachers’ intention to adopt new technologies in their classes was…”
BackgroundResultCabellos, B., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107994 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Adopting Digital Tools in Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges and Theoretical Insights
Mexhuani, B. (2024) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12819 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Preservice Teachers’ Intention to Adopt Technology in Their Future Classrooms
Li, K., Li, Y., & Franklin, T. J. (2016) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633116641694 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“TAM had been applied in the field of technology integration in education (Holden & Rada, 2011; Ma, Andersson, & Streith, 2005; Teo, 2011).”
MethodAdopting technology in schools: modelling, measuring and supporting knowledge appropriation
Ley, T., Tammets, K., Sarmiento‐Márquez, E. M., Leoste, J., Hallik, M., & Poom‐Valickis, K. (2021) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2021.1937113 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“For example, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) by Venkatesh et al. (2003) that integrates a number of models on technology acceptance has found broad applications in modelling teacher readiness to adopt technological innovations in schools (e.g. Teo 2011).”
BackgroundAcceptance and Use of Lecture Capture System (LCS) in Executive Business Studies: Extending UTAUT2
Muhammad Shoaib, F., Maimoona, S., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A. J.-C., Ayupp, K., Radović-Marković, M. M., & Ali, S. (2017) · Unimas Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sarawak) · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Digital Literacy of EFL Students: An Empirical Study in Vietnamese Universities
Nguyen, L. A. T., & Habók, A. (2021) · Libri · doi:10.1515/libri-2020-0165 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“ICT competency covers many fi elds in the realm of technology, such as ICT literacy, digital literacy, information literacy, computer literacy, technology literacy, and advanced and professional skills (Tristán-López and Ylizaliturri-Salcedo 2014).”
BackgroundGalatsopoulou, F., Kenterelidou, C., Kotsakis, R., & Matsiola, M. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12020074 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“ATU is defined as the extent to which a student, in our case, possesses positive feelings about using technology, specifically videos in courses [49].”
BackgroundHsu, Y.-Y., & Lin, C. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00205-2 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“These were the effect of each training strategy, as revealed by SQD-scale data; the training ’ s impact on the participant teachers ’ TPACK-practical knowledge (Yeh et al., 2014); and the training ’ s impact on technology acceptance, as measured by Teo ’ s (2011) scales.”
MethodTechnological readiness and its impact on mobile payment usage: A case study of go-pay
Rahardja, U., Hapsari, I. D., Putra, P. O. H., & Hidayanto, A. N. (2023) · Cogent Engineering · doi:10.1080/23311916.2023.2171566 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“This statement is in line with research conducted by Luarn and Lin (2005), Teo (2011), Zhang et al. (2012), and Alhassan et al. (2020), that perceived ease of use significantly affects user intentions.”
- Authors
- Teo, T.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Teo, Timothy
- ORCID
- Teo, Timothy
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2432-2440
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064430399
- Cited by
- 914
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 180 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 43.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Keywords
- technology integration in teaching, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, subjective norms, facilitating conditions, technology acceptance model, teacher technology use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
