Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microbiology of sugar‐rich environments: diversity, ecology and system constraints

Open access
Lievens, Bart, Hallsworth, John E., Pozo, Maria I., Belgacem, Zouhaier Ben, Stevenson, Andrew, Willems, Kris A., Jacquemyn, Hans·2015·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Microbial habitats that contain an excess of carbohydrate in the form of sugar are widespread in the microbial biosphere. Depending on the type of sugar, prevailing water activity and other substances present, sugar‐rich environments can be highly dynamic or relatively stable, osmotically stressful, and/or destabilizing for macromolecular systems, and can thereby strongly impact the microbial ecology. Here, we review the microbiology of different high‐sugar habitats, including their microbial diversity and physicochemical parameters, which act to impact microbial community assembly and constrain the ecosystem. Saturated sugar beet juice and floral nectar are used as case studies to explore the differences between the microbial ecologies of low and higher water‐activity habitats respectively. Nectar is a paradigm of an open, dynamic and biodiverse habitat populated by many microbial taxa, often yeasts and bacteria such as, amongst many others, Metschnikowia spp. and Acinetobacter spp., respectively. By contrast, thick juice is a relatively stable, species‐poor habitat and is typically dominated by a single, xerotolerant bacterium (Tetragenococcus halophilus). A number of high‐sugar habitats contain chaotropic solutes (e.g. ethyl acetate, phenols, ethanol, fructose and glycerol) and hydrophobic stressors (e.g. ethyl octanoate, hexane, octanol and isoamyl acetate), all of which can induce chaotropicity‐mediated stresses that inhibit or prevent multiplication of microbes. Additionally, temperature, pH , nutrition, microbial dispersion and habitat history can determine or constrain the microbiology of high‐sugar milieux. Findings are discussed in relation to a number of unanswered scientific questions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1462-2920.12570

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Lievens, B., Hallsworth, J. E., Pozo, M. I., Belgacem, Z. B., Stevenson, A., Willems, K. A., & Jacquemyn, H.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-03
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
278-298
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W1539263697
Cited by
199
References
3
FWCI
17.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbiology of sugar‐rich environments: diversity, ecology and system constraints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1462-2920.12570
The paper
Lievens, B., Hallsworth, J. E., Pozo, M. I., Belgacem, Z. B., Stevenson, A., Willems, K. A., & Jacquemyn, H. (2015). Microbiology of sugar‐rich environments: diversity, ecology and system constraints. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12570

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.