Cited by 409Gut microbiota and healthGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research

Oscillospira and related bacteria – From metagenomic species to metabolic features

Open access
Gophna, Uri, Konikoff, Tom, Nielsen, Henrik Bjørn·2017·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Oscillospira is an under‐studied anaerobic bacterial genus from Clostridial cluster IV that has resisted cultivation for over a century since the first time it was observed. In recent years its 16S rRNA gene was identified in several human gut microbiota studies where it was often associated with interesting traits, especially leanness. However, very little is known about its metabolism or physiology. Here we used nearly complete genomes derived from shot‐gun metagenomic data from the human gut to analyze Oscillospira and related bacteria. We used sequence similarity, gene neighbourhood information and manual metabolic pathway curation to decipher key metabolic features of this intriguing bacterial genus. We infer that Oscillospira species are butyrate producers, and at least some of them have the ability to utilize glucuronate, a common animal‐derived sugar that is both produced by the human host and consumed by that host in diets rich in animal products. These findings could help explain diet‐related inter‐individual variation in faecal Oscillospira levels as well as the observation that the presence of this genus is reduced in diseases that involve inflammation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1462-2920.13658

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gophna, U., Konikoff, T., & Nielsen, H. B.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Clinical Microbiomics (Denmark) (DK)
Corresponding author
Gophna, Uri
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-03
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
835-841
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W2566680380
Cited by
409
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9
FWCI
9.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Keywords
Oscillospira, anaerobic bacteria, human gut microbiome, metagenome-assembled genomes, bacterial metabolism, butyrate production, 16S rRNA gene, inflammation
MeSH terms
Eubacteriales, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Butyrates, Clostridium, Feces, Humans, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Genome, Bacterial, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Metagenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review