The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbial nutrient niches in the gut
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The composition and function of the mammalian gut microbiota has been the subject of much research in recent years, but the principles underlying the assembly and structure of this complex community remain incompletely understood. Processes that shape the gut microbiota are thought to be mostly niche‐driven, with environmental factors such as the composition of available nutrients largely determining whether or not an organism can establish. The concept that the nutrient landscape dictates which organisms can successfully colonize and persist in the gut was first proposed in Rolf Freter's nutrient niche theory. In a situation where nutrients are perfectly mixed and there is balanced microbial growth, Freter postulated that an organism can only survive if it is able to utilize one or a few limiting nutrients more efficiently than its competitors. Recent experimental work indicates, however, that nutrients in the gut vary in space and time. We propose that in such a scenario, Freter's nutrient niche theory must be expanded to account for the co‐existence of microorganisms utilizing the same nutrients but in distinct sites or at different times, and that metabolic flexibility and mixed‐substrate utilization are common strategies for survival in the face of ever‐present nutrient fluctuations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome
David, L. A., Maurice, C. F., Carmody, R. N., Gootenberg, D. B., Button, J. E., Wolfe, B. E., Ling, A. V., Devlin, A. S., Varma, Y., Fischbach, M. A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12820 · Cited by 10,100
Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography
Yatsunenko, T., Rey, F. E., Manary, M. J., Trehan, I., Dominguez-Bello, M. G., Contreras, M., Magris, M., Hidalgo, G., Baldassano, R. N., Anokhin, A. P., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11053 · Cited by 7,815
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
De Filippo, C., Cavalieri, D., Di Paola, M., Ramazzotti, M., Poullet, J. B., Massart, S., Collini, S., Pieraccini, G., & Lionetti, P. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1005963107 · Cited by 5,579
Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity
Paine, R. T. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282400 · Cited by 5,361 · cited 2×
“tem (Paine, 1966; Paine, 1969; Mills et al., 1993), though the low abundance criterion is not always”
BackgroundThe Effect of Diet on the Human Gut Microbiome: A Metagenomic Analysis in Humanized Gnotobiotic Mice
Turnbaugh, P. J., Ridaura, V. K., Faith, J. J., Rey, F. E., Knight, R., & Gordon, J. I. (2009) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3000322 · Cited by 3,058 · cited 2×
“Though various factors such as host genotype, immune status, and health state can affect the composition of the gut microbiota, the primary driver appears to be the composition and intake levels of host diet (Turnbaugh et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2011; David et al., 2014b; Zarrinpar et al., 2014; Carmody et al., 2015).”
BackgroundThe gut flora as a forgotten organ
O'Hara, A. M., & Shanahan, F. (2006) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400731 · Cited by 2,791
A note on trophic complexity and community stability.
Paine, R. T. (1969) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282586 · Cited by 1,796
Png, C. W., Lindén, S. K., Gilshenan, K. S., Zoetendal, E. G., McSweeney, C. S., Sly, L. I., McGuckin, M. A., & Florin, T. H. J. (2010) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.281 · Cited by 1,364 · cited 1×
“Co-culture of Akkermansia muciniphila, a mucus degrader, enhances growth of Bacteroides vulgatus in mucin as the sole carbon source, thus functioning as a keystone species in the utilization of mucosal compounds (Png et al., 2010).”
BackgroundThe keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation.
Mills, L. S., & Doak, D. F. (1993) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1312122 · Cited by 1,306
Cited by
Enterotypes in the landscape of gut microbial community composition
Costea, P. I., Hildebrand, F., Arumugam, M., Bäckhed, F., Blaser, M. J., Bushman, F. D., de Vos, W. M., Ehrlich, S. D., Fraser, C. M., Hattori, M., et al. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-017-0072-8 · Cited by 1,138
Huws, S. A., Creevey, C. J., Oyama, L. B., Mizrahi, I., Denman, S. E., Popova, M., Muñoz-Tamayo, R., Forano, E., Waters, S. M., Hess, M., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02161 · Cited by 487
Escherichia coli Residency in the Gut of Healthy Human Adults
Martinson, J. N. V., & Walk, S. T. (2020) · EcoSal Plus · doi:10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0003-2020 · Cited by 197
Strategies to Prevent Sarcopenia in the Aging Process: Role of Protein Intake and Exercise
Rogeri, P. S., Zanella, R., Martins, G. L., Garcia, M. D. A., Leite, G., Lugaresi, R., Gasparini, S. O., Sperandio, G. A., Ferreira, L. H. B., Souza-Junior, T. P., et al. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14010052 · Cited by 181
Compositional and functional features of the female premenopausal and postmenopausal gut microbiota
Zhao, H., Chen, J., Li, X., Sun, Q., Qin, P., & Wang, Q. (2019) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.13527 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Pereira, F. C., & Berry, D.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1366-1378
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2565803617
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 11.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial nutrient niches in the gut. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1462-2920.13659
- The paper
- Pereira, F. C., & Berry, D. (2017). Microbial nutrient niches in the gut. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13659
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
