The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategic Practices: An Activity Theory Perspective on Continuity and Change
Abstract
abstract This paper draws upon activity theory to analyse an empirical investigation of the micro practices of strategy in three UK universities. Activity theory provides a framework of four interactive components from which strategy emerges; the collective structures of the organization, the primary actors, in this research conceptualized as the top management team (TMT), the practical activities in which they interact and the strategic practices through which interaction is conducted. Using this framework, the paper focuses specifically on the formal strategic practices involved in direction setting, resource allocation, and monitoring and control. These strategic practices are associated with continuity of strategic activity in one case study but are involved in the reinterpretation and change of strategic activity in the other two cases. We model this finding into activity theory‐based typologies of the cases that illustrate the way that practices either distribute shared interpretations or mediate between contested interpretations of strategic activity. The typologies explain the relationships between strategic practices and continuity and change of strategy as practice. The paper concludes by linking activity theory to wider change literatures to illustrate its potential as an integrative methodological framework for examining the subjective and emergent processes through which strategic activity is constructed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 2×
“Triangulation avoids the potential bias of a single data source and assists in constructing more complete and accurate analyses through converging sources of evidence (Eisenhardt, 1989; Jick, 1979; Yin, 1994).”
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Explaining Development and Change in Organizations
van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080329 · Cited by 3,762
Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation
Blackler, F. (1995) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069501600605 · Cited by 2,498
Engeström, Y. (1993) · Understanding Practice · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625510.004 · Cited by 853
Cited by
Chia, R., & MacKay, B. (2007) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726707075291 · Cited by 533
Leadership as Practice: Challenging the Competency Paradigm
Carroll, B., Levy, L., & Richmond, D. (2008) · Leadership · doi:10.1177/1742715008095186 · Cited by 466
From autonomous strategic behavior to emergent strategy
Mirabeau, L., & Maguire, S. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2149 · Cited by 271
Pragmatism, Mead and the Practice Turn
Simpson, B. (2009) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609349861 · Cited by 262
Ethical artificial intelligence for teaching-learning in higher education
Airaj, M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12545-x · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Jarzabkowski, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-55
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2136695195
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 21.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategic Practices: An Activity Theory Perspective on Continuity and Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00003
- The paper
- Jarzabkowski, P. (2003). Strategic Practices: An Activity Theory Perspective on Continuity and Change. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.