The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pragmatism, Mead and the Practice Turn
Abstract
‘Practice’ is a familiar term in everyday language but it also has a long history of scholarship. What then does it mean to ‘turn’ towards practice, and how would we know when a practice turn has occurred? To answer these questions, this article develops a theoretical view of practice as a transactional social process involving experience and action as mutually informing aspects of human conduct. This perspective is elaborated in detail by drawing on the ideas of the pragmatist philosophers, especially George Herbert Mead. In particular, it is asserted that ‘transactionality’ and ‘temporality’ , when taken together, offer a theoretical perspective on practice that is dynamic, emergent and socially agentic. The utility of this pragmatist approach is illustrated using a published study of a strategizing episode. The article concludes that a practice turn is indeed underway in organization studies, but there is still some distance to travel before the full potential of this turn is realized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
(1983) · Cited by 33,192
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition
Kuhn, T. S., & Hacking, I. (2012) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001 · Cited by 21,170
Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society
Bijker, W. E., & Latour, B. (1988) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3105094 · Cited by 10,767
Callon, M. (1984) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.1984.tb00113.x · Cited by 7,763
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/231294 · Cited by 6,165
Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing
Reckwitz, A. (2002) · European Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1177/13684310222225432 · Cited by 5,544
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760
Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems
Wenger, E. (2000) · Organization · doi:10.1177/135050840072002 · Cited by 4,274
Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice
Pettigrew, A. M. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.3.267 · Cited by 4,221
Cited by
Re-Turn to Practice: An Introductory Essay
Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D., & Yanow, D. (2009) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609349860 · Cited by 441
The Communicative Constitution of Organization, Organizing, and Organizationality
Schoeneborn, D., Kuhn, T. R., & Kärreman, D. (2019) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840618782284 · Cited by 253
Whyte, J., & Mottee, L. (2022) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.10.007 · Cited by 55
(2011) · DiVA (Linkoping University) · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Simpson, B.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1329-1347
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2048402244
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 19.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pragmatism, Mead and the Practice Turn. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0170840609349861
- The paper
- Simpson, B. (2009). Pragmatism, Mead and the Practice Turn. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349861
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.