The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Filial Piety and Loyalty: Two Types of Social Identification in Confucianism
Abstract
The Confucian concepts of filial piety and loyalty are examined in terms of social identity theory in order to illustrate the arrangement of interpersonal relationships between self and others in Confucian culture. Filial piety, the core idea of Confucian ethics for ordinary people, is explained in the context of my previous analysis of the structure of Confucianism (Hwang, 1995). The social consequences of practicing Confucian ethics for ordinary people in the agricultural society of traditional China are illustrated with Fei's (1948) concept of differential structure and F. L. K. Hsu's (1971) psychosociogram. The concept of loyalty is contrasted with filial piety with reference to the optimal distinctiveness theory. Empirical studies are cited to illuminate the psychological implications of holding filial attitudes and of the modification of filiaty under the impact of modernization. Finally, suggestions for future research are offered based on current analysis of issues related to this topic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
The Interpretation of Cultures
Fenn, R., & Geertz, C. (1974) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384392 · Cited by 19,154
The Interpretation of Cultures
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912128310 · Cited by 16,449
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Sorge, A., & Hofstede, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393017 · Cited by 15,062
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self‐Categorization Theory
REID, F. (1987) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00799.x · Cited by 8,091
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.
Willer, D., Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073157 · Cited by 7,159
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Brewer, M. B. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 · Cited by 5,107
(1970) · Cited by 3,618
What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?
Leventhal, G. S. (1980) · Social Exchange · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2 · Cited by 3,010 · cited 1×
“Distributive justice is the particular method of resource distribution that is accepted by group members (Leventhal, 1976, 1980).”
MethodIndividualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships.
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323 · Cited by 2,970
Cited by
Cross-Cultural Differences in Relationship- and Group-Based Trust
Yuki, M., Maddux, W. W., Brewer, M. B., & Takemura, K. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204271305 · Cited by 422
Attitudes Toward Family Obligation Among Adolescents in Contemporary Urban and Rural China
Fuligni, A. J., & Zhang, W. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00662.x · Cited by 287
Filial Piety, Caregiving Appraisal, and Caregiving Burden
Lai, D. W. L. (2010) · Research on Aging · doi:10.1177/0164027509351475 · Cited by 273
The Myth of Individualism-Collectivism: A Critical Review
Voronov, M., & Singer, J. A. (2002) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224540209603912 · Cited by 272
Wang, L.-F., & Heppner, P. P. (2002) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/00100002030004006 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Hwang, K.
- Venue
- Asian Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 163-183
- ISSN
- 1367-2223 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-839X
- OpenAlex
- W1973706306
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Filial Piety and Loyalty: Two Types of Social Identification in Confucianism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-839x.00031
- The paper
- Hwang, K. (1999). Filial Piety and Loyalty: Two Types of Social Identification in Confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839x.00031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
