The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Web‐based learning interaction and learning styles
Abstract
This paper reports a study exploring the learning styles and perceptions of a group of undergraduate and postgraduate learners in a university in the UK in relation to using the web for learning. In particular, we explore the sequential/global learning style dimension (which is concerned with the progress of understanding) in relation to three categories of web‐based interaction : learner‐tutor, learner‐learner, and learner‐information. An Index of Learning Styles is used as the tool to explore this dimension. The findings are presented with regard to the learning preferences of a group of learners towards these three categories of interaction. We conclude with a discussion of these findings in relation to Interactive Learning Systems (ILSs) design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Mayer, R. E. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811678 · Cited by 7,800
Mayer, R. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781316941355 · Cited by 7,777
Mayer, R. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164603 · Cited by 2,304
When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?
Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.715 · Cited by 1,051
Cited by
Tracking e-learning through published papers: A systematic review
Rodrigues, H., Almeida, F., Figueiredo, V., & Lopes, S. L. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.007 · Cited by 399
Educational magic toys developed with augmented reality technology for early childhood education
Yilmaz, R. M. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.040 · Cited by 311
Phirangee, K. (2016) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v20i4.1053 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Sabry, K., & Baldwin, L.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 443-454
- ISSN
- 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2080471202
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Web‐based learning interaction and learning styles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-8535.00341
- The paper
- Sabry, K., & Baldwin, L. (2003). Web‐based learning interaction and learning styles. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00341
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
