The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions
Abstract
The diffusion model for two-choice real-time decisions is applied to four psychophysical tasks. The model reveals how stimulus information guides decisions and shows how the information is processed through time to yield sometimes correct and sometimes incorrect decisions. Rapid two-choice decisions yield multiple empirical measures: response times for correct and error responses, the probabilities of correct and error responses, and a variety of interactions between accuracy and response time that depend on instructions and task difficulty. The diffusion model can explain all these aspects of the data for the four experiments we present. The model correctly accounts for error response times, something previous models have failed to do. Variability within the decision process explains how errors are made, and variability across trials correctly predicts when errors are faster than correct responses and when they are slower.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the discharge on any one trial resembles a random walk to a threshold representing the level of evidence required to reach a decision, at which point the decision process terminates”
From Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task (2002) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
In the citing paper
“Psychophysical and neural data1 support a model termed drift diffusion6, random walk5,7 or race8 in which a decision is made when the accumulated noisy evidence (decision variable) reaches a criterion level, termed a decision bound.”
From Changes of mind in decision-making (2009) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Several formalisms propose that a representation of noisy evidence is evaluated against a criterion to produce a decision4-8.”
From Changes of mind in decision-making (2009) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“The ensuing tradeoff between speed and accuracy is explained by sequential sampling with optional stopping models in which evidence is accumulated to some stopping criterion or bound (Link, 1975; Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998).”
From A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence (2016) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
In the citing paper
“The class of bounded sequential sampling models, including many variants (Wald, 1947; Stone, 1960; Laming, 1968; Link, 1975; Good, 1979; Luce, 1986; Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998) explains the tradeoff between speed and accuracy, and many of the essential steps have correlates in neurophysiology (Romo et al., 2002; Heekeren et al., 2004; Ploran et al., 2007; Heitz and Schall, 2012; White et al., 2012;”
From A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence (2016) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
In the citing paper
“Many models are proposed to explain the coordination of RT and choice accuracy in 2-choice tasks 4,18,25–27. These models share a common feature: a termination bound is applied to some form of evidence representation, the decision variable.”
From Decision-making with multiple alternatives (2008) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“A simple diffusion model provides a plausible account for the stimulation effects in both areas (Fig. 5).”
From Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task (2006) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, human studies commonly report skewed RT distributions with a long right tail, which is well captured by the diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978; Luce, 1986; Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998; Usher and McClelland, 2001; Sigman and Dehaene, 2005) but not the existing neural circuit model.”
From Decision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits (2008) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
Citations
Cites
An introduction to probability theory and its applications
(1958) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(58)90688-4 · Cited by 29,621
An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications.
Bharucha-Reid, A. T., & Feller, W. (1967) · American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2314609 · Cited by 6,365
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513
Self-citationDecision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.
Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.432 · Cited by 1,925
Information theory of choice-reaction times
Laming, D. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 945
Models for choice-reaction time
Stone, M. (1960) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289729 · Cited by 696
Decision Processes in Visual Perception
(1979) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-11654-6 · Cited by 513
A Sequential Theory of Psychological Discrimination
Link, S. W., & Heath, R. A. (1975) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291481 · Cited by 492
Retrieval processes in recognition memory.
Ratcliff, R., & Murdock, B. B. (1976) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.83.3.190 · Cited by 481
Self-citationComparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization
Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1993) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211715 · Cited by 373
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Estes W.K., 1995, Sources of coherence in text comprehension, 51
- Luce R.D., 1986, Response times
- Ratcliff R., Psychological Review
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,000
Smith, P., & Ulrich, R. (2023) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218231201476 · Cited by 9
Ignatiadis, K., Baier, D., Barumerli, R., Sziller, I., Tóth, B., & Baumgartner, R. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00105-5 · Cited by 10
Liang, G., Huang, L., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114651 · Cited by 9
He, H., Wang, J., Ren, P., Miao, H., & Chi, L. (2025) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102819 · Cited by 9
Jertberg, R., Begeer, S., Geurts, H. M., Chakrabarti, B., & der Burg, E. V. (2025) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.70015 · Cited by 10
The Psychology and Psychobiology of Simple Decisions: Speeded Choice and Its Neural Correlates
Sewell, D. K., & Smith, P. L. (2016) · Studies in neuroscience, psychology and behavioral economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35923-1_14 · Cited by 9
Paper-Based Assessment of the Effects of Aging on Response Time: A Diffusion Model Analysis
Dirk, J., Kratzsch, G. K., Prindle, J. P., Kröhne, U., Goldhammer, F., & Schmiedek, F. (2017) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence5020012 · Cited by 9
Gür, E., Duyan, Y. A., Türkakın, E., Arkan, S., Karson, A., & Balcı, F. (2020) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-020-02101-x · Cited by 9
Partial derivatives for the first-passage time distribution in Wiener diffusion models
Hartmann, R., & Klauer, K. C. (2021) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2021.102550 · Cited by 10
Reward at encoding but not retrieval modulates memory for detailed events
Castanheira, K. D. S., Lalla, A., Ocampo, K., Otto, A. R., & Sheldon, S. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104957 · Cited by 12
Larson, J., & Hawkins, G. E. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000913 · Cited by 10
The effect of speed-stress on driving behavior: A diffusion model analysis
Vanunu, Y., & Ratcliff, R. (2022) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02200-2 · Cited by 9
Self-citationChu, S., Hutcherson, C. A. C., Ito, R., & Lee, A. C. H. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad080 · Cited by 11
Modeling the value-based decision to consume alcohol in response to emotional experiences.
Dora, J., Copeland, A., Field, M., & King, K. M. (2023) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000647 · Cited by 9
Castagna, P. J., Waters, A. C., Edgar, E. V., Budagzad-Jacobson, R. S., & Crowley, M. J. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100593 · Cited by 9
Schneider, S., Hernandez, R., Junghaenel, D. U., Orriens, B., Lee, P.-J., & Stone, A. A. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04773-0 · Cited by 11
Fitousi, D. (2023) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e25081239 · Cited by 9
Dohmen, T., & Jagelka, T. (2023) · Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics · doi:10.1086/727559 · Cited by 9
Accelerated Neurocomputation in Human Decision‐Making Under Time Pressure
Li, S., Liu, S., Lu, Y., Liu, S., Li, L., Liu, Z., & Guo, X. (2024) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14749 · Cited by 9
Response requirements affect offside judgments in football (soccer)
Fasold, F., Wühr, P., & Memmert, D. (2017) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0902-6 · Cited by 9
Multiple Behavioral Rules in Cournot Oligopolies
Alós‐Ferrer, C., & Ritschel, A. (2019) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.12.034 · Cited by 9
A Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff Hierarchical Model Based on Cognitive Experiment
Guo, X., Luo, Z., & Yu, X. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02910 · Cited by 9
Revie, L., Hamilton, C. A., Ciafone, J., Donaghy, P. C., Thomas, A. J., & Metzler‐Baddeley, C. (2020) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci10080540 · Cited by 9
Castagna, P. J., & Crowley, M. J. (2021) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565641.2021.1952206 · Cited by 9
Bernal, F. A., Salgueiro, T. A., Brzostowski, A., Recart, E., Caramés, M. A., Pérez, J. M., Furman, D., Graziano, M., & Larrosa, P. N. F. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22707-x · Cited by 9
Benjamin, A. S. (2013) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0031911 · Cited by 9
Reaching reveals that best-versus-rest processing contributes to biased decision making
Wispinski, N. J., Truong, G., Handy, T. C., & Chapman, C. S. (2017) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.006 · Cited by 10
ELF: A new measure of response capture
Servant, M., Gajdos, T., & Davranche, K. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1389-2 · Cited by 9
Burnham, B. R. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1482-1 · Cited by 9
Autonomy, Evidence-Responsiveness, and the Ethics of Influence
Niker, F., Felsen, G., Nagel, S. K., & Reiner, P. B. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-84494-3_6 · Cited by 9
Revie, L., & Metzler‐Baddeley, C. (2024) · Aging Brain · doi:10.1016/j.nbas.2024.100106 · Cited by 8
Can you tell people’s cognitive ability level from their response patterns in questionnaires?
Schneider, S., Hernandez, R., Junghaenel, D. U., Jin, H., Lee, P.-J., Gao, H., Maupin, D. J., Orriens, B., Meijer, E., & Stone, A. A. (2024) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-024-02388-2 · Cited by 8
Precision and temporal dynamics in heading perception assessed by continuous psychophysics
Jörges, B., Bansal, A., & Harris, L. R. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0311992 · Cited by 8
Under pressure in the Eriksen flanker task
Lubbe, R. H. J. V. D., Panek, B., Szumska, I., & Asanowicz, D. (2025) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.108986 · Cited by 9
Smith, P., & Ulrich, R. (2025) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-024-02075-z · Cited by 8
A Bayesian hierarchical model of trial-to-trial fluctuations in decision criterion
Vloeberghs, R., Urai, A. E., Desender, K., & Linderman, S. W. (2025) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013291 · Cited by 10
Raduner, N., Providoli, C., Pietro, S. V. D., Schneebeli, M., Karipidis, I. I., Casimiro, E., Bedi, S., von Rhein, M., Raschle, N. M., Ruff, C. C., et al. (2025) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101622 · Cited by 9
A response‐locking protocol to boost sensitivity for fMRI ‐based neurochronometry
Viswanathan, S., Abdollahi, R. O., Wang, B., Grefkes, C., Fink, G. R., & Daun, S. (2020) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25026 · Cited by 8
Dual-Task Interference in a Simulated Driving Environment: Serial or Parallel Processing?
Abbaszadeh, M., Hossein‐Zadeh, G., & Vaziri-Pashkam, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579876 · Cited by 11
Of Rodents and Primates: Time-Variant Gain in Drift–Diffusion Decision Models
Asadpour, A., Tan, H. R., Lenfesty, B., & Wong‐Lin, K. (2024) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-023-00194-1 · Cited by 8
Ghaderi, S., Rad, J. A., Hemami, M., & Khosrowabadi, R. (2024) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108847 · Cited by 8
Borter, N., Troche, S. J., & Rammsayer, T. H. (2018) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2018.09.001 · Cited by 8
More than “just a test”—Task-switching paradigms offer an early warning system for cognitive decline
Karayanidis, F., & McKewen, M. (2021) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2021.02.006 · Cited by 10
Stability and Change in Diffusion Model Parameters over Two Years
von Krause, M., Radev, S. T., Voß, A., Quintus, M., Egloff, B., & Wrzus, C. (2021) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence9020026 · Cited by 8
Ko, Y. H., Feuerriegel, D., Turner, W., Overhoff, H., Nießen, E., Stähl, J., Hester, R., Fink, G. R., Weiss, P. H., & Bode, S. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105125 · Cited by 11
DDDM: A Brain-Inspired Framework for Robust Classification
Chen, X., Li, X., Zhou, Y., & Yang, T. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2022/397 · Cited by 8
Exploring visual attention functions of the human extrageniculate pathways through behavioral cues.
Mizzi, R., & Michael, G. A. (2016) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000037 · Cited by 8
Bi-directional audiovisual influences on temporal modulation discrimination
Varghese, L., Mathias, S. R., Bensussen, S., Chou, K. F., Goldberg, H. R., Sun, Y., Sekuler, R., & Shinn‐Cunningham, B. G. (2017) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4979470 · Cited by 8
Extended formulations for order polytopes through network flows
Davis‐Stober, C. P., Doignon, J., Fiorini, S., Glineur, F., & Regenwetter, M. (2018) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2018.08.003 · Cited by 8
Early dynamics of stereoscopic surface slant perception
Caziot, B., Backus, B. T., & Lin, E. (2017) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/17.14.4 · Cited by 8
Saccade selection and inhibition: motor and attentional components
Jonikaitis, D., Dhawan, S., & Deubel, H. (2019) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00726.2017 · Cited by 8
Basu, D., Sendhilnathan, N., & Murthy, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2108922118 · Cited by 8
Blough, D. S. (2004) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/bf03196017 · Cited by 8
Testing Evidence Accrual Models by Manipulating Stimulus Onset
Rouder, J. N. (2001) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1006/jmps.2000.1319 · Cited by 8
Self-citationExpressions for Bayesian confidence of drift diffusion observers in dynamic stimuli tasksPreprint
Calder-Travis, J. M., Bogacz, R., & Yeung, N. (2020) · doi:10.17605/osf.io/tk3vp · Cited by 8
Trippas, D., Kellen, D., Singmann, H., Pennycook, G., Koehler, D. J., Fugelsang, J. A., & Dubé, C. (2017) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gafvu · Cited by 8
Modeling Fan Effects on the Time Course of Associative Recognition
Schneider, D. W., & Anderson, J. R. (2011) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e520602012-148 · Cited by 8
Chwiesko, C., Janecek, J. T., Doering, S., Hollearn, M. K., McMillan, L. C., Vandekerckhove, J., Lee, M. D., Ratcliff, R., & Yassa, M. A. (2023) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.053838.123 · Cited by 9
Self-citationA parameter recovery assessment of a wide class of evidence accumulation models of decision-makingPreprint
Murrow, M., & Holmes, W. R. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4722049/v1 · Cited by 8
Leveraging response times in learning environments: opportunities and challenges
Pelánek, R. (2023) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-023-09386-7 · Cited by 7
Extending systems factorial technology to errored responses.
Little, D. R., Yang, H., Eidels, A., & Townsend, J. T. (2022) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000232 · Cited by 7
Guan, Q., Ma, L., Chen, Y., Luo, Y., & He, H. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad175 · Cited by 7
Examining the Impact of Reading Fluency on Lexical Decision Results in French 6th Graders
Lubineau, M., Watkins, C. P., Glasel, H., & Dehaene, S. (2024) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00140 · Cited by 4
Mapping computational cognitive profiles of aging to dissociable brain and sociodemographic factors
Marzuki, A. A., Wong, K. Y., Chan, J. K., Na, S. Y., Thanaraju, A., Phon-Amnuaisuk, P., Vafa, S., Yap, J., Lim, W., Yip, W. Z., et al. (2024) · npj Aging · doi:10.1038/s41514-024-00171-3 · Cited by 7
Wang, N., Verschooren, S., Vermeylen, L., Grahek, I., & Pourtois, G. (2024) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-024-02028-6 · Cited by 10
Optimal allocation of time in risky choices under opportunity costs
Olschewski, S., Mullett, T. L., & Stewart, N. (2025) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2025.101716 · Cited by 7
Varieties of Psychophysical Procedures∗
Kingdom, F. A. A., & Prins, N. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407156-8.00003-7 · Cited by 7
Response time models separate single- and dual-process accounts of memory-based decisions
Kraemer, P. M., Fontanesi, L., Spektor, M. S., & Gluth, S. (2020) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01794-9 · Cited by 7
Retzler, C., Boehm, U., Cai, J., Cochrane, A., & Manning, C. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218211019939 · Cited by 7
Disentangling choice value and choice conflict in sequential decisions under risk
Fontanesi, L., Shenhav, A., & Gluth, S. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010478 · Cited by 7
A Sequential Sampling Approach to the Integration of Habits and Goals
Zhang, C., van Wissen, A., Dotsch, R., Lakens, D., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2024) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-024-00199-4 · Cited by 7
A symbolic/subsymbolic interface protocol for cognitive modeling
Simen, P., & Polk, T. A. (2009) · Logic Journal of IGPL · doi:10.1093/jigpal/jzp046 · Cited by 7
Leth‐Steensen, C. (2008) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.10.003 · Cited by 7
Emergent Collective Behavior in Multi-Agent Systems: An Evolutionary Perspective
Pais, D. (2013) · Cited by 7
Integrating theoretical models with functional neuroimaging
Pratte, M. S., & Tong, F. (2016) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2016.06.008 · Cited by 7
When Learners Surpass Their Models: Mathematical Modeling of Learning from an Inconsistent Source
Mandelshtam, Y., & Komarova, N. L. (2014) · Bulletin of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s11538-014-9990-2 · Cited by 7
An entropic barriers diffusion theory of decision-making in multiple alternative tasks
Slezak, D. F., Sigman, M., & Cecchi, G. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005961 · Cited by 7
Multisensory Integration for Self-Motion Perception
Hou, H., & Gu, Y. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.23879-0 · Cited by 8
Wühr, P., & Heuer, H. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000731 · Cited by 7
Berlemont, K., Martin, J., Sackur, J., & Nadal, J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63582-8 · Cited by 7
High Speed High Stakes Scoring Rule
Klinkenberg, S. (2014) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08657-6_11 · Cited by 7
Discrimination of Small Forms in a Deviant-Detection Paradigm by 10-month-old Infants
Lindskog, M., Rogell, M., Kenward, B., & Gredebäck, G. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01032 · Cited by 7
Starzynski, C., & Engbert, R. (2009) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.3098950 · Cited by 7
Rabbitt, P. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471214426.pas0418 · Cited by 7
Multialternative Choice Models
Wedell, D. H. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118468333.ch4 · Cited by 7
Arousal Optimizes Neural Evidence Representation for Human Decision-MakingPreprint
Grueschow, M., Polanía, R., Hare, T. A., & Ruff, C. C. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3155606 · Cited by 7
Cognitive Inertia: How Loops Among Attention, Representation, and Decision Making Distort RealityPreprint
Turner, B. M., Blanco, N. J., Unger, L., Kvam, P. D., Ralston, R., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8zvey · Cited by 7
Decision-making under uncertainty
Bruckner, R., & Nassar, M. R. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820480-1.00098-x · Cited by 7
Validation and Comparison of Non-stationary Cognitive Models: A Diffusion Model Application
Schumacher, L., Schnuerch, M., Voß, A., & Radev, S. T. (2024) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-024-00218-4 · Cited by 7
The Evolving ADHD Phenotype in the Externalizing Context
Nigg, J. T. (2026) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.20251165 · Cited by 7
Parker, S., Heathcote, A., & Finkbeiner, M. S. (2020) · Advances in Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.5709/acp-0307-8 · Cited by 6
Deakin, J., Schofield, A. J., & Heinke, D. G. (2024) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e26080642 · Cited by 6
Castagna, P. J., Babinski, D. E., & Waschbusch, D. A. (2024) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-024-02582-9 · Cited by 7
Duc, W. L., Butler, C., Argyropoulos, G. P. D., Chu, S., Hutcherson, C. A. C., Ruocco, A. C., Ito, R., & Lee, A. C. H. (2025) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003033 · Cited by 6
The neural basis of habit formation measured in goal-directed response switching
Michiels, M., Man, V. Y., Luque, D., & Obeso, I. (2026) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.114568 · Cited by 6
Jones, M., & Dzhafarov, E. N. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037701 · Cited by 6
Davis‐Stober, C. P., Brown, N., Park, S., & Regenwetter, M. (2016) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2016.10.009 · Cited by 6
The Neurodynamic Decision Variable in Human Multi-alternative Perceptual Choice
Kohl, C., Spieser, L., Förster, B., Bestmann, S., & Yarrow, K. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01347 · Cited by 6
Ball, F., Groth, R.-M., Agostino, C. S., Porcu, E., & Noesselt, T. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01879-1 · Cited by 6
Shepherdson, P. (2020) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2020.1733155 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 347-356
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2100476792
- Cited by
- 1,478
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- diffusion models, reaction time (psychology), decision accuracy, reaction time variability, task difficulty, real-time decision making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
