The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions
Abstract
The diffusion model for two-choice real-time decisions is applied to four psychophysical tasks. The model reveals how stimulus information guides decisions and shows how the information is processed through time to yield sometimes correct and sometimes incorrect decisions. Rapid two-choice decisions yield multiple empirical measures: response times for correct and error responses, the probabilities of correct and error responses, and a variety of interactions between accuracy and response time that depend on instructions and task difficulty. The diffusion model can explain all these aspects of the data for the four experiments we present. The model correctly accounts for error response times, something previous models have failed to do. Variability within the decision process explains how errors are made, and variability across trials correctly predicts when errors are faster than correct responses and when they are slower.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the discharge on any one trial resembles a random walk to a threshold representing the level of evidence required to reach a decision, at which point the decision process terminates”
From Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task (2002) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
In the citing paper
“Psychophysical and neural data1 support a model termed drift diffusion6, random walk5,7 or race8 in which a decision is made when the accumulated noisy evidence (decision variable) reaches a criterion level, termed a decision bound.”
From Changes of mind in decision-making (2009) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Several formalisms propose that a representation of noisy evidence is evaluated against a criterion to produce a decision4-8.”
From Changes of mind in decision-making (2009) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“The ensuing tradeoff between speed and accuracy is explained by sequential sampling with optional stopping models in which evidence is accumulated to some stopping criterion or bound (Link, 1975; Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998).”
From A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence (2016) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
In the citing paper
“The class of bounded sequential sampling models, including many variants (Wald, 1947; Stone, 1960; Laming, 1968; Link, 1975; Good, 1979; Luce, 1986; Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998) explains the tradeoff between speed and accuracy, and many of the essential steps have correlates in neurophysiology (Romo et al., 2002; Heekeren et al., 2004; Ploran et al., 2007; Heitz and Schall, 2012; White et al., 2012;”
From A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence (2016) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
In the citing paper
“Many models are proposed to explain the coordination of RT and choice accuracy in 2-choice tasks 4,18,25–27. These models share a common feature: a termination bound is applied to some form of evidence representation, the decision variable.”
From Decision-making with multiple alternatives (2008) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“A simple diffusion model provides a plausible account for the stimulation effects in both areas (Fig. 5).”
From Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task (2006) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, human studies commonly report skewed RT distributions with a long right tail, which is well captured by the diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978; Luce, 1986; Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998; Usher and McClelland, 2001; Sigman and Dehaene, 2005) but not the existing neural circuit model.”
From Decision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits (2008) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
Citations
Cites
An introduction to probability theory and its applications
(1958) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(58)90688-4 · Cited by 29,621
An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications.
Bharucha-Reid, A. T., & Feller, W. (1967) · American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2314609 · Cited by 6,365
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513
Self-citationDecision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.
Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.432 · Cited by 1,925
Information theory of choice-reaction times
Laming, D. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 945
Models for choice-reaction time
Stone, M. (1960) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289729 · Cited by 696
Decision Processes in Visual Perception
(1979) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-11654-6 · Cited by 513
A Sequential Theory of Psychological Discrimination
Link, S. W., & Heath, R. A. (1975) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291481 · Cited by 492
Retrieval processes in recognition memory.
Ratcliff, R., & Murdock, B. B. (1976) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.83.3.190 · Cited by 481
Self-citationComparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization
Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1993) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211715 · Cited by 373
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Estes W.K., 1995, Sources of coherence in text comprehension, 51
- Luce R.D., 1986, Response times
- Ratcliff R., Psychological Review
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Neural Basis of Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 · Cited by 3,764
The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420 · Cited by 3,059
Self-citationThe time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model.
Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.550 · Cited by 2,152
Bogacz, R., Brown, E., Moehlis, J., Holmes, P. J., & Cohen, J. D. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.4.700 · Cited by 1,945
Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history
Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007 · Cited by 1,630
Self-citationRoitman, J. D., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-21-09475.2002 · Cited by 1,589
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences
Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1 · Cited by 1,457
A Comparison of Sequential Sampling Models for Two-Choice Reaction Time.
Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.2.333 · Cited by 1,288
Self-citationThe simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation
Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2008) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002 · Cited by 1,198
Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions
Smith, P. L., & Ratcliff, R. (2004) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004.01.006 · Cited by 1,051
Self-citationHDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python
Wiecki, T. V., Sofer, I., & Frank, M. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2013.00014 · Cited by 1,047
A Recurrent Network Mechanism of Time Integration in Perceptual Decisions
Wong, K.-F., & Wang, X.-J. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3733-05.2006 · Cited by 1,029
The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior
Heitz, R. P. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00150 · Cited by 1,054
Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196302 · Cited by 838
Self-citationMultialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionst model of decision making.
Roe, R. M., Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.370 · Cited by 789
Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data
Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. E. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.49547 · Cited by 794
Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.
Pleskac, T. J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0019737 · Cited by 722
The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision
Palmer, J., Huk, A. C., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/5.5.1 · Cited by 691
Decision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits
Wang, X.-J. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.034 · Cited by 679
Changes of mind in decision-making
Resulaj, A., Kiani, R., Wolpert, D. M., & Shadlen, M. N. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08275 · Cited by 678
Decision-making with multiple alternatives
Churchland, A. K., Kiani, R., & Shadlen, M. N. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2123 · Cited by 671
Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring
Yeung, N., & Summerfield, C. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0416 · Cited by 667
Decision Making as a Window on Cognition
Shadlen, M. N., & Kiani, R. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.047 · Cited by 694
Probabilistic population codes for Bayesian decision making
Beck, J. M., Ma, W. J., Kiani, R., Hanks, T., Churchland, A. K., Roitman, J., Shadlen, M. N., Latham, P. E., & Pouget, A. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.021 · Cited by 645
Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure
Forstmann, B. U., Dutilh, G., Brown, S. D., Neumann, J., von Cramon, D. Y., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Wagenmakers, E. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0805903105 · Cited by 675
A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making
Mazurek, M. E., Roitman, J. D., Ditterich, J., & Shadlen, M. N. (2003) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg097 · Cited by 620
Probabilistic brains: knowns and unknowns
Pouget, A., Beck, J. M., Ma, W. J., & Latham, P. E. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3495 · Cited by 615
Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions
Forstmann, B. U., Ratcliff, R., & Wagenmakers, E. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033645 · Cited by 665
Self-citationA tutorial on Bayesian nonparametric models
Gershman, S. J., & Blei, D. M. (2011) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2011.08.004 · Cited by 626
Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time.
Ratcliff, R., Zandt, T. V., & McKoon, G. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.2.261 · Cited by 588
Self-citationDecision theory, reinforcement learning, and the brain
Dayan, P., & Daw, N. D. (2008) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.8.4.429 · Cited by 580
A Diffusion Model Account of the Lexical Decision Task.
Ratcliff, R., Gómez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.1.159 · Cited by 608
Self-citationInterpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation
Voß, A., Rothermund, K., & Voß, J. (2004) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03196893 · Cited by 601
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00971-6 · Cited by 561
An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy
Wagenmakers, E., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194023 · Cited by 586
Huk, A. C., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4684-04.2005 · Cited by 538
Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.414 · Cited by 518
McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K. (2012) · Psychology Review · doi:10.1037/a0029872 · Cited by 391
In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect
Souza, A., & Oberauer, K. (2016) · Attention, perception & psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1108-5 · Cited by 379
Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.389 · Cited by 460
Self-citationRouder, J. N., & Lu, J. (2005) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196750 · Cited by 413
Self-citationDiffusion Models in Experimental Psychology
Voß, A., Nagler, M., & Lerche, V. (2013) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000218 · Cited by 447
Philiastides, M. G., Ratcliff, R., & Sajda, P. (2006) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1655-06.2006 · Cited by 412
Self-citationBinding and Inhibition in Working Memory: Individual and Age Differences in Short-Term Recognition.
Oberauer, K. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.368 · Cited by 420
Temporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory.
Matthews, W. J., & Meck, W. H. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000045 · Cited by 416
Perceptual Decision Making in Rodents, Monkeys, and Humans
Hanks, T. D., & Summerfield, C. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.003 · Cited by 409
Fast-dm: A free program for efficient diffusion model analysis
Voß, A., & Voß, J. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03192967 · Cited by 413
Elapsed Decision Time Affects the Weighting of Prior Probability in a Perceptual Decision Task
Hanks, T. D., Mazurek, M. E., Kiani, R., Hopp, E., & Shadlen, M. N. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5613-10.2011 · Cited by 378
Ratcliff, R., Cherian, A., & Segraves, M. A. (2003) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01049.2002 · Cited by 380
Self-citationMcVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0025896 · Cited by 391
Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task
Hanks, T. D., Ditterich, J., & Shadlen, M. N. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1683 · Cited by 360
Improved Probabilistic Inference as a General Learning Mechanism with Action Video Games
Green, C. S., Pouget, A., & Bavelier, D. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.040 · Cited by 356
Variance as a signature of neural computations during decision making
Churchland, A. K., Kiani, R., Chaudhuri, R., Wang, X.-J., Pouget, A., & Shadlen, M. N. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.12.037 · Cited by 350
Ratcliff, R. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196283 · Cited by 351
Self-citationMeta‐cognition in Animals: A Skeptical Look
Carruthers, P. (2008) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00329.x · Cited by 337
Neurally constrained modeling of perceptual decision making.
Purcell, B. A., Heitz, R. P., Cohen, J. Y., Schall, J. D., Logan, G. D., & Palmeri, T. J. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0020311 · Cited by 342
The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task.
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2001) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.2.323 · Cited by 331
Self-citationLim, S.-L., O'Doherty, J. P., & Rangel, A. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1246-11.2011 · Cited by 329
Reward Pays the Cost of Noise Reduction in Motor and Cognitive Control
Manohar, S., Chong, T. T. ‐., Apps, M. A. J., Batla, A., Stamelou, M., Jarman, P., Bhatia, K. P., & Husain, M. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.038 · Cited by 353
Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times.
Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Lee, M. D. (2011) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0021765 · Cited by 343
Milosavljevic, M., Malmaud, J., Huth, A. G., Koch, C., & Rangel, A. (2010) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500001285 · Cited by 333
A Model of Interval Timing by Neural Integration
Simen, P., Balcı, F., deSouza, L., Cohen, J. D., & Holmes, P. J. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3121-10.2011 · Cited by 323
Rouault, M., Seow, T. X. F., Gillan, C. M., & Fleming, S. M. (2018) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.12.017 · Cited by 349
Single-trial spike trains in parietal cortex reveal discrete steps during decision-making
Latimer, K. W., Yates, J. L., Meister, M. L. R., Huk, A. C., & Pillow, J. W. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa4056 · Cited by 306
Ulrich, R., Schröter, H., Leuthold, H., & Birngruber, T. (2015) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.02.005 · Cited by 322
Estimation and interpretation of 1/fα noise in human cognition
Wagenmakers, E., Farrell, S., & Ratcliff, R. (2004) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196615 · Cited by 305
Self-citationA diffusion model account of criterion shifts in the lexical decision task
Wagenmakers, E., Ratcliff, R., Gómez, P., & McKoon, G. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.006 · Cited by 315
Self-citationA Diffusion Model Analysis of the Effects of Aging in the Lexical-Decision Task.
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., Gómez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.278 · Cited by 305
Self-citationTesting theories of post-error slowing
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Forstmann, B. U., Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2011) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0243-2 · Cited by 314
Diffusion models of the flanker task: Discrete versus gradual attentional selection
White, C. N., Ratcliff, R., & Starns, J. J. (2011) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.08.001 · Cited by 301
Self-citationDecision processes in human performance monitoring
Steinhauser, M., & Yeung, N. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1899-10.2010 · Cited by 284
Caudate Encodes Multiple Computations for Perceptual Decisions
Ding, L., & Gold, J. I. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2894-10.2010 · Cited by 299
Ploran, E. J., Nelson, S. M., Velanova, K., Donaldson, D. I., Petersen, S. E., & Wheeler, M. E. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3522-07.2007 · Cited by 282
Rhythmic Fluctuations in Evidence Accumulation during Decision Making in the Human Brain
Wyart, V., de Gardelle, V., Scholl, J., & Summerfield, C. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.015 · Cited by 281
Karalunas, S. L., Geurts, H. M., Konrad, K., Bender, S., & Nigg, J. T. (2014) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12217 · Cited by 278
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2003) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-02-00632.2003 · Cited by 281
Ratcliff, R., Philiastides, M. G., & Sajda, P. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0812589106 · Cited by 301
Self-citationSullivan, N. J., Hutcherson, C. A. C., Harris, A. M., & Rangel, A. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614559543 · Cited by 290
The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning
Pedersen, M. L., Frank, M. J., & Biele, G. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1199-y · Cited by 295
A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention.
Hübner, R., Steinhauser, M., & Lehle, C. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0019471 · Cited by 287
A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence
van den Berg, R., Anandalingam, K., Zylberberg, A., Kiani, R., Shadlen, M. N., & Wolpert, D. M. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.12192 · Cited by 270
Ding, L., & Gold, J. I. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr178 · Cited by 273
Statistical methods for linguistic research: Foundational Ideas—Part II
Nicenboim, B., & Vasishth, S. (2016) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12207 · Cited by 285
Klinkenberg, S., Straatemeier, M., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.003 · Cited by 261
Good things peak in pairs: a note on the bimodality coefficient
Pfister, R., Schwarz, K. A., Janczyk, M., Dale, R. A. C., & Freeman, J. B. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00700 · Cited by 258
The Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in the Elderly Brain: A Structural Model-Based Approach
Forstmann, B. U., Tittgemeyer, M., Wagenmakers, E., Derrfuß, J., Imperati, D., & Brown, S. D. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0309-11.2011 · Cited by 275
Cognitive and sensory declines in old age: Gauging the evidence for a common cause.
Lindenberger, U., & Ghisletta, P. (2009) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0014986 · Cited by 266
Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory.
Ratcliff, R., & Starns, J. J. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0014086 · Cited by 261
Self-citationA diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on recognition memory
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2004) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.11.002 · Cited by 252
Self-citationA diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification.
Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.26.1.127 · Cited by 238
Self-citationIndividual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2009) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.09.001 · Cited by 249
Self-citationPratte, M. S., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Feng, C. (2010) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.72.7.2013 · Cited by 249
Self-citationRatcliff, R., Hasegawa, Y. T., Hasegawa, R. P., Smith, P. L., & Segraves, M. A. (2007) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00393.2006 · Cited by 236
Self-citationMicrostimulation of visual cortex affects the speed of perceptual decisions
Ditterich, J., Mazurek, M. E., & Shadlen, M. N. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1094 · Cited by 234
Stochastic models of decisions about motion direction: Behavior and physiology
Ditterich, J. (2006) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2006.05.042 · Cited by 233
Seeing at a glance, smelling in a whiff: rapid forms of perceptual decision making
Uchida, N., Kepecs, Á., & Mainen, Z. F. (2006) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1933 · Cited by 234
Wagenmakers, E. (2008) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440802205067 · Cited by 245
Evidence for time‐variant decision making
Ditterich, J. (2006) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05221.x · Cited by 240
A ballistic model of choice response time
Brown, S., & Heathcote, A. (2005) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.117 · Cited by 228
Real-Time Strategy Game Training: Emergence of a Cognitive Flexibility Trait
Glass, B. D., Maddox, W. T., & Love, B. C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070350 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 347-356
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2100476792
- Cited by
- 1,478
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- diffusion models, reaction time (psychology), decision accuracy, reaction time variability, task difficulty, real-time decision making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
