The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions
Abstract
The diffusion model for two-choice real-time decisions is applied to four psychophysical tasks. The model reveals how stimulus information guides decisions and shows how the information is processed through time to yield sometimes correct and sometimes incorrect decisions. Rapid two-choice decisions yield multiple empirical measures: response times for correct and error responses, the probabilities of correct and error responses, and a variety of interactions between accuracy and response time that depend on instructions and task difficulty. The diffusion model can explain all these aspects of the data for the four experiments we present. The model correctly accounts for error response times, something previous models have failed to do. Variability within the decision process explains how errors are made, and variability across trials correctly predicts when errors are faster than correct responses and when they are slower.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the discharge on any one trial resembles a random walk to a threshold representing the level of evidence required to reach a decision, at which point the decision process terminates”
From Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task (2002) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
In the citing paper
“Psychophysical and neural data1 support a model termed drift diffusion6, random walk5,7 or race8 in which a decision is made when the accumulated noisy evidence (decision variable) reaches a criterion level, termed a decision bound.”
From Changes of mind in decision-making (2009) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Several formalisms propose that a representation of noisy evidence is evaluated against a criterion to produce a decision4-8.”
From Changes of mind in decision-making (2009) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“The ensuing tradeoff between speed and accuracy is explained by sequential sampling with optional stopping models in which evidence is accumulated to some stopping criterion or bound (Link, 1975; Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998).”
From A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence (2016) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
In the citing paper
“The class of bounded sequential sampling models, including many variants (Wald, 1947; Stone, 1960; Laming, 1968; Link, 1975; Good, 1979; Luce, 1986; Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998) explains the tradeoff between speed and accuracy, and many of the essential steps have correlates in neurophysiology (Romo et al., 2002; Heekeren et al., 2004; Ploran et al., 2007; Heitz and Schall, 2012; White et al., 2012;”
From A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence (2016) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
In the citing paper
“Many models are proposed to explain the coordination of RT and choice accuracy in 2-choice tasks 4,18,25–27. These models share a common feature: a termination bound is applied to some form of evidence representation, the decision variable.”
From Decision-making with multiple alternatives (2008) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“A simple diffusion model provides a plausible account for the stimulation effects in both areas (Fig. 5).”
From Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task (2006) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, human studies commonly report skewed RT distributions with a long right tail, which is well captured by the diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978; Luce, 1986; Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998; Usher and McClelland, 2001; Sigman and Dehaene, 2005) but not the existing neural circuit model.”
From Decision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits (2008) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
Citations
Cites
An introduction to probability theory and its applications
(1958) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(58)90688-4 · Cited by 29,621
An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications.
Bharucha-Reid, A. T., & Feller, W. (1967) · American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2314609 · Cited by 6,365
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513
Self-citationDecision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.
Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.432 · Cited by 1,925
Information theory of choice-reaction times
Laming, D. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 945
Models for choice-reaction time
Stone, M. (1960) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289729 · Cited by 696
Decision Processes in Visual Perception
(1979) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-11654-6 · Cited by 513
A Sequential Theory of Psychological Discrimination
Link, S. W., & Heath, R. A. (1975) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291481 · Cited by 492
Retrieval processes in recognition memory.
Ratcliff, R., & Murdock, B. B. (1976) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.83.3.190 · Cited by 481
Self-citationComparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization
Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1993) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211715 · Cited by 373
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Estes W.K., 1995, Sources of coherence in text comprehension, 51
- Luce R.D., 1986, Response times
- Ratcliff R., Psychological Review
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,000
A synchronization account of false recognition
Johns, B. T., Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2012) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.07.002 · Cited by 49
Linking cognitive and reaching trajectories via intermittent movement control
Friedman, J., Brown, S. D., & Finkbeiner, M. S. (2013) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2013.06.005 · Cited by 53
Bompas, A., Sumner, P., Muthumumaraswamy, S. D., Singh, K. D., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.057 · Cited by 49
Bacon-Macé, N., Kirchner, H., Fabre‐Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1013 · Cited by 51
Parts of me: Identity-relevance moderates self-prioritization
Golubickis, M., Falbén, J. K., Ho, N. S. P., Sui, J., Cunningham, W. A., & Macrae, C. N. (2019) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2019.102848 · Cited by 53
Trial-by-trial adjustments of top-down set modulate oculomotor capture
Moher, J., Abrams, J., Egeth, H. E., Yantis, S., & Stuphorn, V. (2011) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0118-5 · Cited by 52
Not all Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off Manipulations Have the Same Psychological Effect
Katsimpokis, D., Hawkins, G. E., & van Maanen, L. (2020) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-020-00074-y · Cited by 48
An integrated theory of deciding and acting.
Servant, M., Logan, G. D., Gajdos, T., & Evans, N. J. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001063 · Cited by 53
Simultaneous modeling of choice, confidence, and response time in visual perception.
Hellmann, S., Zehetleitner, M., & Rausch, M. (2023) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000411 · Cited by 53
Bonaiuto, J. J., de Berker, A. O., & Bestmann, S. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.20047 · Cited by 53
Inhibiting responses to difficult choices.
Matzke, D., Curley, S., Gong, C. Q., & Heathcote, A. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000525 · Cited by 49
Steinhauser, M., Maier, M. E., & Hübner, R. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.158 · Cited by 52
Latency and Accuracy of Discriminations of Odor Quality between Binary Mixtures and their Components
Wise, P. M., & Cain, W. S. (2000) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/25.3.247 · Cited by 48
Response time distributions in multidimensional perceptual categorization
Maddox, W. T., Ashby, F. G., & Gottlob, L. R. (1998) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03206050 · Cited by 48
Niyogi, R. K., & Wong-Lin, K. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003099 · Cited by 47
Assessing model-based inferences in decision making with single-trial response time decomposition.
Weindel, G., Anders, R., Alario, F. ‐., & Burle, B. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001010 · Cited by 53
Task-Related Versus Stimulus-Specific Practice
Dutilh, G., Krypotos, A., & Wagenmakers, E. (2011) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000111 · Cited by 49
Time-varying boundaries for diffusion models of decision making and response time
Zhang, S., Lee, M. D., Vandekerckhove, J., Maris, G., & Wagenmakers, E. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01364 · Cited by 47
Need for closure is associated with urgency in perceptual decision-making
Evans, N. J., Rae, B., Bushmakin, M. A., Rubin, M., & Brown, S. D. (2017) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-017-0718-z · Cited by 47
Munoz, D. P., & Schall, J. D. (2003) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203501504.ch3 · Cited by 49
Rational Inattention when Decisions Take Time
Hebert, B. M., & Woodford, M. (2019) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w26415 · Cited by 47
Quantum cognition and bounded rationality
Blutner, R., & Graben, P. B. (2015) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0928-5 · Cited by 56
Miller, P. C., & Katz, D. B. (2013) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-013-0452-x · Cited by 46
Crosslinking EEG time–frequency decomposition and fMRI in error monitoring
Hoffmann, S. F., Labrenz, F., Themann, M., Wascher, E., & Beste, C. (2013) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-013-0521-y · Cited by 46
Modeling categorization of scenes containing consistent versus inconsistent objects
Mack, M. L. (2010) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/10.3.11 · Cited by 48
Factor analysis linking functions for simultaneously modeling neural and behavioral data
Turner, B. M., Wang, T., & Merkle, E. C. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.044 · Cited by 49
Osth, A. F., & Farrell, S. (2019) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000149 · Cited by 50
Flexible and efficient simulation-based inference for models of decision-making
Boelts, J., Lueckmann, J.-M., Gao, R., & Macke, J. H. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.77220 · Cited by 56
Nuthmann, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2012) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.670142 · Cited by 46
Extended LATER model can account for trial-by-trial variability of both pre- and post-processes
Nakahara, H., Nakamura, K., & Hikosaka, O. (2006) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2006.07.001 · Cited by 45
Non-decision time: The Higgs Boson of decision.
Bompas, A., Sumner, P., & Hedge, C. (2024) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000487 · Cited by 47
Components of task switching: A closer look at task switching and cue switching
Schmitz, F., & Voß, A. (2014) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.009 · Cited by 56
Preparatory Attention: Experiment and Theory
LaBerge, D., Auclair, L., & Siéroff, É. (2000) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1006/ccog.1999.0429 · Cited by 45
Heitz, R. P., Cohen, J. Y., Woodman, G. F., & Schall, J. D. (2010) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00604.2010 · Cited by 45
Noisy preferences in risky choice: A cautionary note.
Bhatia, S., & Loomes, G. (2017) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000073 · Cited by 47
Evans, N. J., Hawkins, G. E., Boehm, U., Wagenmakers, E., & Brown, S. D. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16694-7 · Cited by 45
A parameter recovery assessment of time-variant models of decision-making
Evans, N. J., Trueblood, J. S., & Holmes, W. R. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01218-0 · Cited by 45
Shushruth, S., Mazurek, M. E., & Shadlen, M. N. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0668-18.2018 · Cited by 45
A hierarchical approach for fitting curves to response time measurements
Rouder, J. N., Tuerlinckx, F., Speckman, P. L., Lu, J., & Gómez, P. (2008) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.15.6.1201 · Cited by 45
Self-citationAssessing Automatic Activation of Valence
Stahl, C., & Degner, J. (2007) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.54.2.99 · Cited by 45
What can the diffusion model tell us about prospective memory?
Horn, S. S., Bayen, U. J., & Smith, R. E. (2011) · Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale · doi:10.1037/a0022808 · Cited by 46
The role of response mechanisms in determining reaction time performance: Piéron’s law revisited
Stafford, T., & GURNEY, K. N. (2004) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196729 · Cited by 45
Trial-history biases in evidence accumulation can give rise to apparent lapses in decision-making
Gupta, D., DePasquale, B., Kopec, C. D., & Brody, C. D. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44880-5 · Cited by 44
Designing and Interpreting Psychophysical Investigations of Cognition
Waskom, M., Okazawa, G., & Kiani, R. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.016 · Cited by 49
Kang, Y. H., Löffler, A., Jeurissen, D., Zylberberg, A., Wolpert, D. M., & Shadlen, M. N. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.63721 · Cited by 46
A Bayesian approach to diffusion process models of decision-making
Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Lee, M. D. (2008) · Lirias · Cited by 44
Maniscalco, B., Odegaard, B., Grimaldi, P., Cho, S. H., Basso, M. A., Lau, H., & Peters, M. A. K. (2021) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008779 · Cited by 44
Enhanced error‐related negativity on flanker errors: Error expectancy or error significance?
Maier, M. E., di Pellegrino, G., & Steinhauser, M. (2012) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01373.x · Cited by 43
Brain and Behavior in Decision-Making
Cassey, P., Heathcote, A., & Brown, S. D. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003700 · Cited by 43
Benjamin, A. S., Tullis, J. G., & Lee, J. H. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0031849 · Cited by 43
Relating accumulator model parameters and neural dynamics
Purcell, B. A., & Palmeri, T. J. (2016) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2016.07.001 · Cited by 42
Likelihood ratio sequential sampling models of recognition memory
Osth, A. F., Dennis, S. J., & Heathcote, A. (2016) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.11.007 · Cited by 45
Lerche, V., & Voß, A. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1034-7 · Cited by 46
Sequential sampling models with variable boundaries and non-normal noise: A comparison of six models
Voß, A., Lerche, V., Mertens, U. K., & Voß, J. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1560-4 · Cited by 45
Calanchini, J., Lai, C. K., & Klauer, K. C. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000339 · Cited by 44
A perspective on neural and cognitive mechanisms of error commission
Hoffmann, S. F., & Beste, C. (2015) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00050 · Cited by 47
Age-dependent relationships between prefrontal cortex activation and processing efficiency
Motes, M. A., Biswal, B. B., & Bart Rypma, A. (2010) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588928.2010.512974 · Cited by 46
Evaluating methods for approximating stochastic differential equations
Brown, S. D., Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2006) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2006.03.004 · Cited by 43
Self-citationOptimal decision making in neural inhibition models.
van Ravenzwaaij, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Wagenmakers, E. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0026275 · Cited by 43
Heitz, R. P., & Schall, J. D. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0071 · Cited by 45
Evidence against perfect integration of sensory information during perceptual decision making
Carland, M. A., Marcos, E., Thura, D., & Cisek, P. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00264.2015 · Cited by 45
A diffusion model analysis of the response-effect compatibility effect.
Janczyk, M., & Lerche, V. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000430 · Cited by 43
Automatic biases in intertemporal choice
Zhao, W. J., Diederich, A., Trueblood, J. S., & Bhatia, S. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01579-9 · Cited by 42
Three challenges for connecting model to mechanism in decision-making
Churchland, A. K., & Kiani, R. (2016) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.008 · Cited by 40
Osth, A. F., Jansson, A. K., Dennis, S. J., & Heathcote, A. (2018) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.04.002 · Cited by 44
Evans, N. J., & Hawkins, G. E. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.014 · Cited by 45
Does emotion influence visual perception? Depends on how you look at it
Niedenthal, P. M., & Wood, A. (2019) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2018.1561424 · Cited by 47
Cognitive, Systems, and Computational Neurosciences of the Self in Motion
Noel, J., & Angelaki, D. E. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-021021-103038 · Cited by 43
Molenaar, D., Tuerlinckx, F., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v066.i04 · Cited by 46
Aging Influences the Neural Correlates of Lexical Decision but Not Automatic Semantic Priming
Gold, B. T., Andersen, A. H., Jicha, G. A., & Smith, C. D. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp018 · Cited by 41
The dynamics of deferred decision
Bhatia, S., & Mullett, T. L. (2016) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.02.002 · Cited by 45
Rebar, A. L., Ram, N., & Conroy, D. E. (2014) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.09.008 · Cited by 40
Prior preferences beneficially influence social and non-social learning
Tarantola, T., Kumaran, D., Dayan, P., & Martino, B. D. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00826-8 · Cited by 40
A framework for building cognitive process models
Jarecki, J. B., Tan, J. H., & Jenny, M. A. (2020) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01747-2 · Cited by 44
Impaired Evidence Accumulation as a Transdiagnostic Vulnerability Factor in Psychopathology
Sripada, C., & Weigard, A. S. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.627179 · Cited by 44
Hales, C. A., Houghton, C. J., & Robinson, E. S. J. (2017) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.09.008 · Cited by 41
Strategically managing learning during perceptual decision making
Masis, J. A., Chapman, T., Rhee, J. Y., Cox, D., & Saxe, A. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.64978 · Cited by 42
Combining Speed and Accuracy to Assess Error-Free Cognitive Processes
Glickman, M. E., Gray, J. R., & Morales, C. J. (2005) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-002-0999-3 · Cited by 43
The Ising Decision Maker: A binary stochastic network for choice response time.
Verdonck, S., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037012 · Cited by 40
Non-monotonic Temporal-Weighting Indicates a Dynamically Modulated Evidence-Integration Mechanism
Bronfman, Z. Z., Brezis, N., & Usher, M. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004667 · Cited by 39
A Scanpath Analysis of the Risky Decision‐Making Process
Zhou, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Rao, L., Wang, W., Li, S., Li, X., & Liang, Z. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1943 · Cited by 40
Visual Prediction Error Spreads Across Object Features in Human Visual Cortex
Jiang, J., Summerfield, C., & Egner, T. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1546-16.2016 · Cited by 38
Speed and accuracy on the Hearts and Flowers task interact to predict child outcomes.
Camerota, M., Willoughby, M. T., & Blair, C. (2019) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000725 · Cited by 49
New estimation approaches for the hierarchical Linear Ballistic Accumulator model
Gunawan, D., Hawkins, G. E., Tran, M., Kohn, R., & Brown, S. D. (2020) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102368 · Cited by 39
Cognitive mechanisms underlying depressive disorders in ADHD: A systematic review
Mayer, J. S., Bernhard, A., Fann, N., Boxhoorn, S., Hartman, C. A., Reif, A., & Freitag, C. M. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.018 · Cited by 48
Iigaya, K., Jolivald, A., Jitkrittum, W., Gilchrist, I. D., Dayan, P., Paul, E. S., & Mendl, M. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165840 · Cited by 40
Curvilinear dependency of response accuracy on response time in cognitive tests
Chen, H., de Boeck, P. A. L., Grady, M., Yang, C., & Waldschmidt, D. M. (2018) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2018.04.001 · Cited by 38
Sequential sampling from memory underlies action selection during abstract decision-making
Shushruth, S., Zylberberg, A., & Shadlen, M. N. (2022) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.03.014 · Cited by 41
Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements
Brodersen, K. H., Penny, W. D., Harrison, L. M., Jean Daunizeau, A., Ruff, C. C., Düzel, E., Friston, K. J., & Stephan, K. E. (2008) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2008.08.007 · Cited by 38
Mood and the speed of decisions about anticipated resources and hazards
Paul, E. S., Cuthill, I. C., Kuroso, G., Norton, V., Woodgate, J., & Mendl, M. (2010) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.07.005 · Cited by 38
The roles of distractor noise and target certainty in search: A signal detection model
Santhi, N., & Reeves, A. (2004) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.011 · Cited by 38
Wolf, C., & Lappe, M. (2021) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-020-09661-y · Cited by 38
Ramakrishnan, A., Sureshbabu, R., & Murthy, A. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3668-11.2012 · Cited by 38
The diffusion model is not a deterministic growth model: Comment on Jones and Dzhafarov (2014).
Smith, P. L., Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037667 · Cited by 37
Self-citationSpeed-accuracy tradeoff by a control signal with balanced excitation and inhibition
Lo, C., Wang, C.-T., & Wang, X. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00845.2013 · Cited by 39
Osth, A. F., Bora, B., Dennis, S. J., & Heathcote, A. (2017) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.04.003 · Cited by 38
Simple measurement models for complex working-memory tasks.
Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000159 · Cited by 40
McMurray, B. (2022) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02143-8 · Cited by 37
Motivational incentives modulate age differences in visual perception.
Spaniol, J., Voß, A., Bowen, H. J., & Grady, C. L. (2011) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0023297 · Cited by 43
Klauer, K. C., & Voß, A. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208318603 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 347-356
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2100476792
- Cited by
- 1,478
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- diffusion models, reaction time (psychology), decision accuracy, reaction time variability, task difficulty, real-time decision making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
