The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions
Abstract
The diffusion model for two-choice real-time decisions is applied to four psychophysical tasks. The model reveals how stimulus information guides decisions and shows how the information is processed through time to yield sometimes correct and sometimes incorrect decisions. Rapid two-choice decisions yield multiple empirical measures: response times for correct and error responses, the probabilities of correct and error responses, and a variety of interactions between accuracy and response time that depend on instructions and task difficulty. The diffusion model can explain all these aspects of the data for the four experiments we present. The model correctly accounts for error response times, something previous models have failed to do. Variability within the decision process explains how errors are made, and variability across trials correctly predicts when errors are faster than correct responses and when they are slower.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the discharge on any one trial resembles a random walk to a threshold representing the level of evidence required to reach a decision, at which point the decision process terminates”
From Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task (2002) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
In the citing paper
“Psychophysical and neural data1 support a model termed drift diffusion6, random walk5,7 or race8 in which a decision is made when the accumulated noisy evidence (decision variable) reaches a criterion level, termed a decision bound.”
From Changes of mind in decision-making (2009) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“Several formalisms propose that a representation of noisy evidence is evaluated against a criterion to produce a decision4-8.”
From Changes of mind in decision-making (2009) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“The ensuing tradeoff between speed and accuracy is explained by sequential sampling with optional stopping models in which evidence is accumulated to some stopping criterion or bound (Link, 1975; Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998).”
From A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence (2016) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
In the citing paper
“The class of bounded sequential sampling models, including many variants (Wald, 1947; Stone, 1960; Laming, 1968; Link, 1975; Good, 1979; Luce, 1986; Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998) explains the tradeoff between speed and accuracy, and many of the essential steps have correlates in neurophysiology (Romo et al., 2002; Heekeren et al., 2004; Ploran et al., 2007; Heitz and Schall, 2012; White et al., 2012;”
From A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence (2016) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
In the citing paper
“Many models are proposed to explain the coordination of RT and choice accuracy in 2-choice tasks 4,18,25–27. These models share a common feature: a termination bound is applied to some form of evidence representation, the decision variable.”
From Decision-making with multiple alternatives (2008) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“A simple diffusion model provides a plausible account for the stimulation effects in both areas (Fig. 5).”
From Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task (2006) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, human studies commonly report skewed RT distributions with a long right tail, which is well captured by the diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978; Luce, 1986; Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998; Usher and McClelland, 2001; Sigman and Dehaene, 2005) but not the existing neural circuit model.”
From Decision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits (2008) · cites this paper as Ratcliff and Rouder, 1998
Citations
Cites
An introduction to probability theory and its applications
(1958) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(58)90688-4 · Cited by 29,621
An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications.
Bharucha-Reid, A. T., & Feller, W. (1967) · American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2314609 · Cited by 6,365
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513
Self-citationDecision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.
Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.432 · Cited by 1,925
Information theory of choice-reaction times
Laming, D. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 945
Models for choice-reaction time
Stone, M. (1960) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289729 · Cited by 696
Decision Processes in Visual Perception
(1979) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-11654-6 · Cited by 513
A Sequential Theory of Psychological Discrimination
Link, S. W., & Heath, R. A. (1975) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291481 · Cited by 492
Retrieval processes in recognition memory.
Ratcliff, R., & Murdock, B. B. (1976) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.83.3.190 · Cited by 481
Self-citationComparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization
Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1993) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211715 · Cited by 373
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Estes W.K., 1995, Sources of coherence in text comprehension, 51
- Luce R.D., 1986, Response times
- Ratcliff R., Psychological Review
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,000
Black or White but Never Neutral: How Readers Perceive Identity from Yellow or Skin-toned Emoji
Robertson, A., Magdy, W., & Goldwater, S. J. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3476091 · Cited by 22
Adaptive Allocation of Vision under Competing Task Demands
Sims, C. R., Jacobs, R. A., & Knill, D. C. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4240-10.2011 · Cited by 20
Investigating the speed–accuracy trade-off: Better use deadlines or response signals?
Dambacher, M., & Hübner, R. (2013) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0303-0 · Cited by 20
de Hollander, G., Labruna, L., Sellaro, R., Trutti, A. C., Colzato, L. S., Ratcliff, R., Ivry, R. B., & Forstmann, B. U. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00967 · Cited by 20
Self-citationModelling individual difference in visual categorization
Shen, J., & Palmeri, T. J. (2016) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2016.1236053 · Cited by 20
Perceived Average Orientation Reflects Effective Gist of the Surface
Cha, O., & Chong, S. C. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617735533 · Cited by 20
The modulatory role of pre-SMA in speed-accuracy tradeoff: A bi-directional TMS study
Berkay, D., Eser, H. Y., Sack, A. T., Çakmak, Y. Ö., & Balcı, F. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.031 · Cited by 22
Effects of implicit fear of failure on cognitive processing: A diffusion model analysis
Lerche, V., Neubauer, A. B., & Voß, A. (2018) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-018-9691-5 · Cited by 27
The unfolding action model of initiation times, movement times, and movement paths.
Calderon, C. B., Gevers, W., & Verguts, T. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000110 · Cited by 21
Search for Face Identity or Expression: Set Size Effects in Developmental Prosopagnosia
Djouab, S., Albonico, A., Yeung, S. C., Malaspina, M., Mogard, A., Wahlberg, R., Corrow, S. L., & Barton, J. J. S. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01519 · Cited by 20
Salience-based progression of visual attention
Michael, G. A., & Galvéz-García, G. (2011) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.05.024 · Cited by 25
Noise in Attractor Networks in the Brain Produced by Graded Firing Rate Representations
Webb, T. J., Rolls, E. T., Deco, G., & Feng, J. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023630 · Cited by 20
Trageser, J. C., Monosov, I. E., Zhou, Y., & Thompson, K. G. (2008) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06530.x · Cited by 20
General Cognitive Ability and the Psychological Refractory Period
Lee, J. J., & Chabris, C. F. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612471540 · Cited by 23
Little, D. R., Wang, T., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2016) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.07.001 · Cited by 21
Computational models as statistical tools
Durstewitz, D., Koppe, G., & Toutounji, H. (2016) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.07.004 · Cited by 19
Efficient selection between hierarchical cognitive models: Cross-validation with variational Bayes.
Dao, V. H., Gunawan, D., Tran, M., Kohn, R., Hawkins, G. E., & Brown, S. D. (2022) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000458 · Cited by 23
Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually?
Hübner, R. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00061 · Cited by 19
Colas, J. T. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186822 · Cited by 21
Little, D. R., Eidels, A., Fifić, M., & Wang, T. S. L. (2018) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-018-0001-9 · Cited by 19
Working memory improves developmentally as neural processes stabilize
Montez, D. F., Calabro, F. J., & Luna, B. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213010 · Cited by 20
Rafiei, F., & Rahnev, D. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-79765-2 · Cited by 21
Qualitative speed-accuracy tradeoff effects can be explained by a diffusion/fast-guess mixture model
Ratcliff, R., & Kang, I. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94451-7 · Cited by 21
Self-citationCorrelates of Perceptual Learning in an Oculomotor Decision Variable
Connolly, P. M., Bennur, S., & Gold, J. I. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3962-08.2009 · Cited by 19
Yan, H., Zhang, K., & Wang, J. (2016) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/25/7/078702 · Cited by 20
On Reporting the Onset of the Intention to Move
Maoz, U., Mudrik, L., Rivlin, R., Ross, I. B., Mamelak, A. N., & Yaffe, G. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199333950.003.0010 · Cited by 19
The dynamics of multimodal integration: The averaging diffusion model
Turner, B. M., Gao, J., Koenig, S. C., Palfy, D., & McClelland, J. L. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1255-2 · Cited by 19
Menceloğlu, M., Suzuki, S., & Song, J. (2021) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-020-02235-4 · Cited by 18
Smith, P. L. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02237-3 · Cited by 19
Optimal metacognitive control of memory recall.
Callaway, F., Griffiths, T. L., Norman, K. A., & Zhang, Q. (2023) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000441 · Cited by 23
Eye-hand coordination during a double-step task: evidence for a common stochastic accumulator
Gopal, A., & Murthy, A. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00276.2015 · Cited by 18
Learning to allocate limited time to decisions with different expected outcomes
Khodadadi, A., Fakhari, P., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2017) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.03.002 · Cited by 18
Expressions for Bayesian confidence of drift diffusion observers in fluctuating stimuli tasks
Calder-Travis, J., Bogacz, R., & Yeung, N. (2023) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1101/2020.02.25.965384 · Cited by 19
Evans, N. J., Tillman, G., & Wagenmakers, E. (2020) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000192 · Cited by 20
Paradoxical relationship between speed and accuracy in olfactory figure-background segregation
Lebovich, L., Yunerman, M., Scaiewicz, V., Loewenstein, Y., & Rokni, D. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009674 · Cited by 19
Stochastic Process Underlying Emergent Recognition of Visual Objects Hidden in Degraded Images
Murata, T., Hamada, T., Shimokawa, T., Tanifuji, M., & Yanagida, T. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115658 · Cited by 19
McKendrick, A. M., Denniss, J., & Turpin, A. H. (2014) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2014.04.013 · Cited by 18
Gradual growth versus shape invariance in perceptual decision making.
Rouder, J. N., Yu, Y., Speckman, P. L., Pratte, M. S., & Province, J. M. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0020793 · Cited by 18
Self-citationLoof, E. D., Filip Van Opstal, A., & Verguts, T. (2016) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2016.03.002 · Cited by 18
Decision Making: Neural Correlates of Response Time
Schall, J. D. (2002) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01311-8 · Cited by 19
Scale Invariant Contrasts of Response Latency DistributionsPreprint
Sriram, N., Nosek, B. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2213910 · Cited by 18
The Importance of Common Currency Tasks in Translational Psychiatry
Pike, A. C., Lowther, M., & Robinson, O. J. (2021) · Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports · doi:10.1007/s40473-021-00225-w · Cited by 19
Wolf, C., & Lappe, M. (2022) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-022-02587-z · Cited by 19
Rasanan, A. H. H., Rad, J. A., & Sewell, D. K. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02284-4 · Cited by 17
The Seven-parameter Diffusion Model: an Implementation in Stan for Bayesian Analyses
Henrich, F., Hartmann, R., Pratz, V., Voß, A., & Klauer, K. C. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02179-1 · Cited by 17
Piéron's Law Holds During Stroop Conflict: Insights Into the Architecture of Decision Making
Stafford, T., Ingram, L., & GURNEY, K. N. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01195.x · Cited by 17
Saccadic brightness decisions do not use a difference model
Liston, D. B., & Stone, L. S. (2013) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/13.8.1 · Cited by 17
Is saccade averaging determined by visual processing or movement planning?
Bhutani, N., Ray, S., & Murthy, A. (2012) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00344.2012 · Cited by 17
Neurocognitive Modeling of Perceptual Decision Making
Palmeri, T. J., Schall, J. D., & Logan, G. D. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199957996.013.15 · Cited by 17
Froehlich, E., Liebig, J., Ziegler, J. C., Braun, M., Lindenberger, U., Heekeren, H. R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01863 · Cited by 19
The overlooked ubiquity of first-person experience in the cognitive sciences
Rigato, J., Rennie, S. M., & Mainen, Z. F. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02136-6 · Cited by 17
How does the emotional experience evolve? Feeling generation as evidence accumulation.
Givon, E., Itzhak-Raz, A., Karmon-Presser, A., Danieli, G., & Meiran, N. (2020) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000537 · Cited by 17
Categorical interoception and the role of threat
Zacharioudakis, N., Vlemincx, E., & den Bergh, O. V. (2019) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.12.009 · Cited by 21
Harun, R., Jun, E. J., Park, H. H., Ganupuru, P., Goldring, A. B., & Hanks, T. D. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00826 · Cited by 17
Evidence for dopaminergic involvement in endogenous modulation of pain relief
Desch, S., Schweinhardt, P., Seymour, B., Flor, H., & Becker, S. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.81436 · Cited by 19
Breaking the rules in perceptual information integration
Bushmakin, M. A., Eidels, A., & Heathcote, A. (2017) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.03.001 · Cited by 17
Röhner, J., & Thoss, P. (2018) · The Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.14.1.p017 · Cited by 18
A Race Model for Responses and Response Times in Tests
Ranger, J., Kuhn, J., & Gaviria, J. L. (2014) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-014-9427-8 · Cited by 18
Diffusion and Random Walk Processes
Ratcliff, R. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/00620-3 · Cited by 17
Self-citationModel flexibility analysis does not measure the persuasiveness of a fit.
Evans, N. J., Howard, Z. L., Heathcote, A., & Brown, S. D. (2017) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000057 · Cited by 16
Contextual prediction errors reorganize naturalistic episodic memories in time
Yazin, F., Das, M., Banerjee, A., & Roy, D. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-90990-1 · Cited by 19
Temporal dynamics of decision making: A synthesis of computational and neurophysiological approaches
Harris, A. M., & Hutcherson, C. A. C. (2021) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1586 · Cited by 19
Different Forms of Variability Could Explain a Difference Between Human and Rat Decision Making
Nguyen, Q. N., & Reinagel, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.794681 · Cited by 16
Kraemer, P. M., & Gluth, S. (2023) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01968 · Cited by 21
Lüken, M., Heathcote, A., Haaf, J. M., & Matzke, D. (2025) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02621-1 · Cited by 19
Schnelles Beurteilen von Schülerantworten: Ein Reaktionszeittest für Mathematiklehrer/innen
Krauß, S., & Brunner, M. (2011) · Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik · doi:10.1007/s13138-011-0029-z · Cited by 16
Nydam, A. S., Sewell, D. K., & Dux, P. E. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.11.008 · Cited by 16
Spieser, L., Kohl, C., Förster, B., Bestmann, S., & Yarrow, K. (2018) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0159-18.2018 · Cited by 16
Impact of Context Information on Metaphor Elaboration
Lerche, V., Christmann, U., & Voß, A. (2018) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000422 · Cited by 16
Retrieval in prospective memory: Multiple processes or just delay?
Anderson, F. T., & McDaniel, M. (2019) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021819845622 · Cited by 14
Bayesian Evidence Accumulation on Social Networks
Karamched, B. R., Stolarczyk, S., Kilpatrick, Z. P., & Josić́, K. (2020) · SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems · doi:10.1137/19m1283793 · Cited by 17
Modeling the interaction of numerosity and perceptual variables with the diffusion model
Kang, I., & Ratcliff, R. (2020) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101288 · Cited by 17
Self-citationRapid Learning of Complex Sequences With Time Constraints: A Dynamic Neural Field Model
Ferreira, F., Wojtak, W., de Sousa, E. A. F., Louro, L., Bicho, E. G., & Erlhagen, W. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2020.2991789 · Cited by 16
Trading accuracy for speed over the course of a decision
Derosière, G., Thura, D., Cisek, P., & Duqué, J. (2021) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00038.2021 · Cited by 16
Linear Integration of Sensory Evidence over Space and Time Underlies Face Categorization
Okazawa, G., Sha, L., & Kiani, R. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3055-20.2021 · Cited by 16
Closed-Form Approximations of First-Passage Distributions for a Stochastic Decision-Making Model
Broderick, T., Wong‐Lin, K., & Holmes, P. J. (2010) · Applied Mathematics Research eXpress · doi:10.1093/amrx/abp008 · Cited by 16
Modeling memory dynamics in visual expertise.
Annis, J. S., & Palmeri, T. J. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000664 · Cited by 16
A random-ray model for speed and accuracy in perceptual experiments
DeCaro, S. A., Santhi, N., & Reeves, A. (2005) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/1568568052801582 · Cited by 16
A model-based quantification of action control deficits in Parkinson's disease
Servant, M., van Wouwe, N. C., Wylie, S. A., & Logan, G. D. (2018) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.014 · Cited by 16
An Optimizing Neuroeconomic Model of Discrete Choice
Woodford, M. (2014) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w19897 · Cited by 16
Fievez, F., Derosière, G., Verbruggen, F., & Duqué, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.864590 · Cited by 21
Liang, B., Li, Y., Zhao, W., & Du, Y. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40445-0 · Cited by 15
Reach Trajectories Characterize Tactile Localization for Sensorimotor Decision Making
Brandes, J., & Heed, T. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1873-14.2015 · Cited by 15
Variability in behavior that cognitive models do not explain can be linked to neuroimaging data
Gluth, S., & Rieskamp, J. (2016) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2016.04.012 · Cited by 16
Biased and unbiased perceptual decision-making on vocal emotions
Dricu, M., Ceravolo, L., Grandjean, D., & Frühholz, S. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16594-w · Cited by 17
He, L., Golman, R., & Bhatia, S. (2019) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.03.003 · Cited by 15
The validity and consistency of continuous joystick response in perceptual decision-making
Szul, M. J., Bompas, A., Sumner, P., & Zhang, J. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01269-3 · Cited by 16
Lerche, V., & Voß, A. (2020) · The Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.16.2.p107 · Cited by 17
Supekar, K., Chang, H., Mistry, P. K., Iuculano, T., & Menon, V. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-01872-1 · Cited by 18
Binding Costs in Processing Efficiency as Determinants of Cognitive Ability
Goecke, B., Schmitz, F., & Wilhelm, O. (2021) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence9020018 · Cited by 15
The Sternberg Paradigm: Correcting Encoding Latencies in Visual and Auditory Test Designs
Klabes, J., Babilon, S., Zandi, B., & Khanh, T. Q. (2021) · Vision · doi:10.3390/vision5020021 · Cited by 15
Psychological value theory: The psychological value of human lives and economic goods.
Cohen, D. J., Cromley, A. R., Freda, K. E., & White, M. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0001047 · Cited by 16
Uncovering the cognitive mechanisms underlying the gaze cueing effect
Alister, M., McKay, K. T., Sewell, D. K., & Evans, N. J. (2023) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218231181238 · Cited by 15
TAT-HUM: Trajectory analysis toolkit for human movements in Python
Wang, X. M., & Welsh, T. N. (2024) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-024-02378-4 · Cited by 15
Ma, N., & Yu, A. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01046 · Cited by 16
The social cost of gathering information for trust decisions
Ma, I., Sanfey, A. G., & Ma, W. J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69766-6 · Cited by 18
The Timing of Vision – How Neural Processing Links to Different Temporal Dynamics
Masquelier, T., Albantakis, L., & Deco, G. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00151 · Cited by 21
Simon, D. M., Nidiffer, A. R., & Wallace, M. T. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-30414-9 · Cited by 15
Metacognitive Computations for Information Search: Confidence in ControlPreprint
Schulz, L., Fleming, S. M., & Dayan, P. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.03.01.433342 · Cited by 18
Domingue, B. W., Braginsky, M., Caffrey-Maffei, L. A., Gilbert, J. B., Kanopka, K., Kapoor, R., Lee, H., Liu, Y., Nadela, S., Pan, G., et al. (2025) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-025-02796-y · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 347-356
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2100476792
- Cited by
- 1,478
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- diffusion models, reaction time (psychology), decision accuracy, reaction time variability, task difficulty, real-time decision making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
