The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation
Abstract
In a nonverbal counting task derived from the animal literature, adult human subjects repeatedly attempted to produce target numbers of key presses at rates that made vocal or subvocal counting difficult or impossible. In a second task, they estimated the number of flashes in a rapid, randomly timed sequence. Congruent with the animal data, mean estimates in both tasks were proportional to target values, as was the variability in the estimates. Converging evidence makes it unlikely that subjects used verbal counting or time durations to perform these tasks. The results support the hypothesis that adult humans share with nonverbal animals a system for representing number by magnitudes that have scalar variability (a constant coefficient of variation). The mapping of numerical symbols to mental magnitudes provides a formal model of the underlying nonverbal meaning of the symbols (a model of numerical semantics).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality
MOYER, R. S., & LANDAUER, T. K. (1967) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2151519a0 · Cited by 2,068
Cited by
Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants
Xu, F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00066-9 · Cited by 1,531
The Development of Numerical Estimation: Evidence for Multiple Representations of Numerical Quantity
Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.02438 · Cited by 1,045
Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers
Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01424-2 · Cited by 852
Self-citationHaidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008) · The Innate Mind, Volume 3 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019 · Cited by 650
Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition
Alvarez, G. A. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.003 · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- Whalen, J., Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 130-137
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2060677735
- Cited by
- 683
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9280.00120
- The paper
- Whalen, J., Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1999). Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.