The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expression Without Recognition: Contributions of the Human Amygdala to Emotional Communication
Abstract
A growing body of evidence from humans and other animals suggests the amygdala may be a critical neural substrate for emotional processing. In particular, recent studies have shown that damage to the human amygdala impairs the normal appraisal of social signals of emotion, primarily those of fear. However, effective social communication depends on both the ability to receive (emotional appraisal) and the ability to send (emotional expression) signals of emotional state. Although the role of the amygdala in the appraisal of emotion is well established, its importance for the production of emotional expressions is unknown. We report a case study of a patient with bilateral amygdaloid damage who, despite a severe deficit in interpreting facial expressions of emotion including fear, exhibits an intact ability to express this and other basic emotions. This dissociation suggests that a single neural module does not support all aspects of the social communication of emotional state.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Patients with amygdala damage can recognise faces and generate a normal range of facial expressions (Anderson and Phelps, 2000).”
From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Anderson and Phelps, 2000
Citations
Cites
An argument for basic emotions
Ekman, P. (1992) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699939208411068 · Cited by 9,646
Ekman, P. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,345
(1996) · Cited by 3,692
Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/372669a0 · Cited by 2,360
A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions
Morris, J. S., Frith, C. D., Perrett, D. I., Rowland, D., Young, A. W., Calder, A. J., & Dolan, R. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/383812a0 · Cited by 2,013
Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research.
Scherer, K. R. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.2.143 · Cited by 1,826
Response and Habituation of the Human Amygdala during Visual Processing of Facial Expression
Breiter, H. C., Etcoff, N. L., Whalen, P. J., Kennedy, W. A., Rauch, S. L., Buckner, R. L., Strauss, M. M., Hyman, S. E., & Rosen, B. R. (1996) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80219-6 · Cited by 1,711
The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style
Davidson, R. J., & Irwin, W. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01265-0 · Cited by 1,684
Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: Emotional expression and brain physiology: I.
Davidson, R. J., Ekman, P., Saron, C. D., Senulis, J. A., & Friesen, W. V. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.330 · Cited by 1,684
Mechanisms of emotional arousal and lasting declarative memory.
Cahill, L., & McGaugh, J. L. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01214-9 · Cited by 1,575
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Anderson A.K., 1996, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 22, 1866
- Kling A.S., 1992, The amygdala, 353
- 10.1037/0021-843X.93.4.355 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Contributions of the Amygdala to Emotion Processing: From Animal Models to Human Behavior
Phelps, E. A., & LeDoux, J. E. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.025 · Cited by 3,203
Self-citationThe amygdala: vigilance and emotion
Davis, M., & Whalen, P. J. (2001) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4000812 · Cited by 2,882
Neural systems for recognizing emotion
Adolphs, R. (2002) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00301-x · Cited by 1,933
Emotion and Cognition: Insights from Studies of the Human Amygdala
Phelps, E. A. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070234 · Cited by 1,798
Self-citationThe neurobiology of social cognition
Adolphs, R. (2001) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00202-6 · Cited by 1,432
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, A. K., & Phelps, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Anderson, Adam K.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 106-111
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2063474774
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (50812)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- amygdala, emotional expression, emotional communication, emotional facial expressions, fear, social communication, emotional appraisal, neural dissociation, emotion production
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Brain Damage, Chronic, Dominance, Cerebral, Emotions, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Nonverbal Communication, Social Behavior, Social Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
