Cited by 510Face Recognition and PerceptionMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Impaired Recognition of Social Emotions following Amygdala Damage

Adolphs, Ralph, Baron-Cohen, Simon, Tranel, Daniel·2002·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Lesion, functional imaging, and single-unit studies in human and nonhuman animals have demonstrated a role for the amygdala in processing stimuli with emotional and social significance. We investigated the recognition of a wide variety of facial expressions, including basic emotions (e.g., happiness, anger) and social emotions (e.g., guilt, admiration, flirtatiousness). Prior findings with a standardized set of stimuli indicated that recognition of social emotions can be signaled by the eye region of the face and is disproportionately impaired in autism (Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, & Jolliffe, 1997). To test the hypothesis that the recognition of social emotions depends on the amygdala, we administered the same stimuli to 30 subjects with unilateral amygdala damage (16 left, 14 right), 2 with bilateral amygdala damage, 47 brain-damaged controls, and 19 normal controls. Compared with controls, subjects with unilateral or bilateral amygdala damage were impaired when recognizing social emotions; moreover, they were more impaired in recognition of social emotions than in recognition of basic emotions, and, like previously described patients with autism, they were impaired also when asked to recognize social emotions from the eye region of the face alone. The findings suggest that the human amygdala is relatively specialized to process stimuli with complex social significance. The results also provide further support for the idea that some of the impairments in social cognition seen in patients with autism may result from dysfunction of the amygdala.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/089892902760807258

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with amygdala damage show impairments interpreting social emotions such as guilt.

    “Patients also showed impairments in interpreting expressions of social emotions such as guilt (Adolphs et al., 2002)”

    From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Adolphs et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adolphs, R., Baron-Cohen, S., & Tranel, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Cambridge University
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2002-11
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
1264-1274
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2032225883
Cited by
510
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 36
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
amygdala, facial expression recognition, basic emotions, social emotions, amygdala damage, autism spectrum disorder, social cognition
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Autistic Disorder, Emotions, Eye, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Case-Control Studies, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review