Gone but Not Forgotten: The Transient Nature of Retrieval-Induced Forgetting
Abstract
Recent research has demonstrated that the act of remembering can prompt temporary forgetting or, more specifically, the inhibition of particular items in memory. Extending work of this kind, the present research investigated some possible boundary conditions of retrieval-induced forgetting. As expected, a critical determinant of temporary forgetting was the interval between guided retrieval practice and a final recall test. When these two phases were separated by 24 hr, retrieval-induced forgetting failed to emerge. When they occurred in the same testing session, however, retrieval practice prompted the inhibition of related items in memory (i.e., Experiment 1). A delay of 24 hr between the encoding of material and guided retrieval practice reduced but did not eliminate retrieval-induced forgetting (i.e., Experiment 2). These findings are considered in the wider context of adaptive forgetting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Retrieval-induced forgetting tends to be short-lived.
“Specifically, Chan noted that retrieval-induced forgetting tends to be short-lived (MacLeod & Macrae 2001) and can be eliminated if participants are asked to integrate the materials (Anderson & McCulloch 1999).”
From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as MacLeod & Macrae 2001
Cites
Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval.
Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996) · Memory · doi:10.1016/b978-012102570-0/50010-0 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Integration as a general boundary condition on retrieval-induced forgetting.
Anderson, M. C., & McCulloch, K. C. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.608 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Psychology and Neuroscience of Forgetting
Wixted, J. T. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141555 · Cited by 999 · see citing works
Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting.
Anderson, M. (2003) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.006 · Cited by 918 · see citing works
Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting
Krakauer, J. W., Ghez, C., & Ghilardi, M. F. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4218-04.2005 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Huang, V. S., Haith, A., Mazzoni, P., & Krakauer, J. W. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.012 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
MacLeod, C. M., Dodd, M. D., Sheard, E. D., Wilson, D. E., & Bibi, U. (2003) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(03)01014-4 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
A neural network model of retrieval-induced forgetting
Norman, K. A., Newman, E. L., & Detre, G. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.887 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning
McDermott, K. B. (2021) · Annual review of psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051019 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
- Authors
- MacLeod, M. D., & Macrae, C. N.
- Affiliations
- University of St Andrews (GB)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- MacLeod, Malcolm D.
- ORCID
- Macrae, C. Neil
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 148-152
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2116284179
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Keywords
- retrieval-induced forgetting, memory inhibition, adaptive forgetting, encoding delay, boundary conditions
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Practice, Psychological, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review