The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Top Ten Challenges for Understanding Gender and Aggression in Children: Why Can’t We All Just Get Along?
Abstract
This essay identifies ten significant methodological challenges for understanding aggression and gender. In light of the recent explosion of research on indirect/relational/social aggression, it seems important to clarify gaps in our current understanding and to identify promising methods by which better answers might be found. The discussion begins with basic issues of definitions, contexts and subtypes, moves on to points concerning sampling and measures, and addresses whether current evidence warrants deciding that girls are as aggressive as boys. We conclude that although research has shown that the majority of girls’ aggression takes indirect/relational/social forms, it is premature to conclude that boys do not also engage in these behaviors. We caution against assuming that physical and indirect/relational/social aggression are comparable in their developmental origins and consequences, and urge researchers to consider that fully understanding indirect/relational/social aggression might require different conceptual frameworks and research methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x · Cited by 1,917
An Integrated Review of Indirect, Relational, and Social Aggression
Archer, J., & Coyne, S. M. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_2 · Cited by 1,115
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x · Cited by 1,012
Childhood peer relationships: social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks
Gifford-Smith, M. E., & Brownell, C. A. (2003) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-4405(03)00048-7 · Cited by 961
Forms and Functions of Adolescent Peer Aggression Associated With High Levels of Peer Status
Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2003) · Merrill-Palmer Quarterly · doi:10.1353/mpq.2003.0015 · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Underwood, M. K., Galenand, B. R., & Paquette, J. A.
- Venue
- Social Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 248-266
- ISSN
- 0961-205X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9507
- OpenAlex
- W2080231935
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Top Ten Challenges for Understanding Gender and Aggression in Children: Why Can’t We All Just Get Along? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9507.00162
- The paper
- Underwood, M. K., Galenand, B. R., & Paquette, J. A. (2001). Top Ten Challenges for Understanding Gender and Aggression in Children: Why Can’t We All Just Get Along? Social Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.