The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Eating ‘Green’: Motivations behind organic food consumption in Australia
Open accessAbstract
Central to the development of green lifestyles is the consumption of foods that by dint of their status as chemical–free, locally produced and/or free of genetically modified ingredients, reduce the environmental impact of food provision. Yet there are many other factors, such as health concerns, that may also encourage the consumption of ‘green’ foods. This paper explores the ways in which Australian consumers construct organic food — a sector of the food industry that is currently growing at between 20 and 50 percent per annum but is struggling to keep up with rising consumer demand. In order to examine the significance of ‘green’ signifiers in the consumption practices of Australian consumers a series of focus group interviews and a national consumer survey were conducted. These examined both those characteristics of food that were valued in general, and those meanings that were associated with organic food in particular. In very general terms, analysis reveals that while consumers believed organic foods to be healthy and environmentally sound — both of which were considered desirable — these characteristics were subsumed by an overarching concern with convenience. This does not mean that consumers did not hold genuinely positive environmental attitudes. Rather, it reflects a range of contradictory beliefs and practices that appeared to derive from the discursive conflict between conventional and organic food industries over environmental, health and safety claims. The paper concludes by identifying the barriers and opportunities for expanding the organic industry in Australia in the context of the ways organics is constructed by consumers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STEPTOE, A., POLLARD, T. M., & WARDLE, J. (1995) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1995.0061 · Cited by 2,176
Quantification of Consumer Attitudes to Health and Hedonic Characteristics of Foods
ROININEN, K., LÄHTEENMÄKI, L., & TUORILA, H. (1999) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1999.0232 · Cited by 790
Measurement of ethical food choice motives
Lindeman, M., & Väänänen, M. (2000) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1999.0293 · Cited by 437
Who buys organic food?: A profile of the purchasers of organic food in Northern Ireland
Davies, A., Titterington, A. J., & Cochrane, C. (1995) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070709510104303 · Cited by 435
What motivates consumers to buy organic food in the UK?: Results from a qualitative study
Makatouni, A. (2002) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700210425769 · Cited by 420
Mobilizing the Consumer: Assembling the Subject of Consumption
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1997) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/026327697014001001 · Cited by 331
Gender Differences in Opinions and Practices with Regard to a "Healthy Diet">
FAGERLI, R. A., & WANDEL, M. (1999) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1998.0188 · Cited by 315
Regulating Meaning, Appropriating Nature: The Codification of California Organic Agriculture
Guthman, J. (1998) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00071 · Cited by 221
The Farmer Within an Institutional Environment. Comparing Danish and Belgian Organic Farming
Lynggaard, K. (2001) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00171 · Cited by 70
Food Data Quality in Nutritional Surveys: which Issues are to be Tackled?
Turrini, A. (2000) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1006/jfca.1999.0885 · Cited by 9
Cited by
Padel, S., & Foster, C. (2005) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700510611002 · Cited by 1,214
Michaelidou, N., & Hassan, L. M. (2008) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00619.x · Cited by 989
Consumer purchase intention for organic personal care products
Yeon Kim, H., & Chung, J. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363761111101930 · Cited by 834
The importance of food naturalness for consumers: Results of a systematic review
Román, S., Sánchez-Siles, L. M., & Siegrist, M. (2017) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2017.06.010 · Cited by 760
The place of food: mapping out the ‘local’ in local food systems
Feagan, R. (2007) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132507073527 · Cited by 758
Metadata
- Authors
- Lockie, S., Lyons, K., Lawrence, G., & Mummery, K.
- Venue
- Sociologia Ruralis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-40
- ISSN
- 0038-0199 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9523
- OpenAlex
- W2071876269
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 7.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eating ‘Green’: Motivations behind organic food consumption in Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9523.00200
- The paper
- Lockie, S., Lyons, K., Lawrence, G., & Mummery, K. (2002). Eating ‘Green’: Motivations behind organic food consumption in Australia. Sociologia Ruralis. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.