The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can Social Systems Be Autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann's Social Theory
Abstract
The theory of autopoiesis, that is systems that are self-producing or self-constructing, was originally developed to explain the particular nature of living as opposed to non-living entities. It was subsequently enlarged to encompass cognition and language leading to what is known as second-order cybernetics. However, as with earlier biological theories, many authors have tried to extend the domain of the theory to encompass social systems, the most notable being Luhmann. The purpose of this article is to consider critically the extent to which the theory of autopoiesis, as originally defined, can be applied to social systems – that is, whether social systems are autopoietic. And, if it cannot, whether some weaker version might be appropriate.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Feedback controls in biological organisms or cultural systems implement and maintain organization and purposiveness: ' in the social world . . . we see many groupings -families, companies, religions, cultures and societies -that exhibit long-term stability and persistence despite enormous changes in their environment, and their own internal membership and structure ' (Mingers 2002: 281).”
From Religion as a Complex and Dynamic System (2013) · cites this paper as Mingers 2002: 281
In the citing paper
“These systems are: self-producing; contingently maintained (so that they don't breakdown); structurally open but organizationally closed; structurally determined; able to be structurally coupled to other systems by mutual specification and/or co-evolution; and able to embrace embodied cognition and self-reference/recursion to enable self-construction/production (Mingers, 2002, p. 280).”
From Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action (2022) · cites this paper as Mingers, 2002
In the citing paper
“This can be achieved through the nature and dynamics of autopoiesis or self-producing/constructing physical systems (Bunker et al., 2013;Mingers, 2002Mingers, , 2004)).”
From Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action (2022) · cites this paper as Mingers, 2002
Citations
Cites
Powers, C. H., & Giddens, A. (1988) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579442 · Cited by 8,854
(1951) · Cited by 8,693
The theory of communicative action
Edgar, A. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315710495-5 · Cited by 8,669
Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980) · Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4 · Cited by 5,815
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
Varela, F. J., Rosch, E., & Thompson, E. (1991) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001 · Cited by 5,765
Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis.
Louis, M. R., Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392394 · Cited by 5,576
How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics
Hayles, N. K. (1999) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001 · Cited by 5,284
Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living
Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J., & Beer, S. (1980) · Cited by 4,667
International Social Science Journal
(1963) · Anthropology News · doi:10.1111/an.1963.4.7.6.1 · Cited by 2,733
An Invitation to Social Construction
Gergen, K. J. (2015) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781473921276 · Cited by 2,704
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Buckley W., 1968, Modern Systems Research for the Behavioural Scientist
- Grosz E., 1994, Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism
- Habermas J., 1971, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie
- Luhmann N., 1984, Soziale Systeme
- Luhmann N., 1986, Sociocybernetic Paradoxes
- Luhmann N., 1987, Autopoiesis and the Law, 335
- Luhmann N., 1987, Autopoiesis and the Law, 12
- Luhmann N., 1989, Northwestern University Law Review, 83, 136
- Luhmann N., 1990, Essays in Self-Reference
- Luhmann N., 1992, Cardozo Law Review, 13, 1419
- Luhmann N., 1995, Social Systems
- Manicas P., 1998, Critical Realism: Essential Readings, 313
- Maturana H., 1975, Encyclopedie de la Pleiade, Series Methodique
- Maturana H., 1978, Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honour of Eric Lenneberg, 27
- Maturana H., 1980, Autopoietic Systems in the Social Sciences, 11
- Maturana H., 1987, Physics of Cognitive Processes, 324
- Maturana H., 1993, Zeichen (Theorie) in der Praxis, 37
- Maturana H., 1995, Consciousness: Distinction and Reflection
- Maturana H., 1995, Biology Research, 28, 15
- Mingers J., 2001, Information and Organization (formerly Accounting, Management and Information Technology), 11, 103
- Morgan G., 1986, Images of Organisation
- Stokes P., 1990, Self-Steering and Cognition in Complex Systems: Towards a New Cybernetics
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–160 of 160
Pedagogical ways of knowing in the design studio
Kethro, P. (2013) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.23596.03206 · Cited by 2
I Act Therefore I Live? Autopoiesis, Sensorimotor Autonomy, and Extended Agency
Trybulec, B. (2024) · Diametros · doi:10.33392/diam.1847 · Cited by 2
Mavetera, C. G. (2012) · Boloka Institutional Repository (North-west University) · Cited by 2
Modelling and measuring the dynamics of scientific communication
Lucio‐Arias, D. (2010) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 2
The complexity of learning : relations all the way down
Lancaster, J. (2010) · UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 2
Math is alive: the metaphor of living school disciplines and some of the educational implications
Stockton, S. (2017) · Mspace (University of Manitoba) · Cited by 2
Towards Effective Use of Technology-Enabled Systems in Emergency Management and Crisis Situations
Fischer-Preßler, D. (2022) · doi:10.20378/irb-52620 · Cited by 2
Hilton, J. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13090788 · Cited by 3
“Consequently, the different organisations within the enterprise may have varying contributions or purposes to resolve highly complex societal challenges [41,42].”
Observando a indecidibilidade da participação do terceiro setor na governação em rede
Ferreira, S. (2012) · Revista crítica de ciências sociais/Revista crítica de ciências sociais · doi:10.4000/rccs.4955 · Cited by 1
Die belang van Niklas Luhmann vir kommunikasieteorie: 'n Inleidende interpretasie.
Davis, C. (2013) · Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe · Cited by 1
Second Problem Area: Openness and Determinacy
von Elverfeldt, K. (2012) · Springer theses · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2822-6_4 · Cited by 1
Training Company Self-Organization
Abramek, E. (2020) · Advances in human resources management and organizational development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-6713-5.ch006 · Cited by 1
Self-Organizing Manufacturing Systems in Industry 4.0
Rodič, B. (2020) · Advances in human resources management and organizational development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-6713-5.ch017 · Cited by 1
Usai, G. (2011) · Sinergie Italian Journal of Management · doi:10.7433/s72.2007.06 · Cited by 1
Autopoiesis and dysfunctional organisational processes
Blackman, D. A., & Henderson, S. (2004) · International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy · doi:10.1504/ijmcp.2004.004841 · Cited by 1
“Here there be dragons”: Using systems thinking to explore constitutional issues
Kerkin, S. (2017) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17058206.v1 · Cited by 1
Analysis of Special Education Tribunal Outcomes Using Luhmann's Systems Theory
Valeo, A., & Underwood, K. (2023) · doi:10.32920/24150444 · Cited by 1
Steuerung in Organisationen aus Sicht der Systemtheorie
(2008) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-91353-7_2 · Cited by 1
Susen, S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4651250 · Cited by 1
Meeting the Challenge … An Approach to a Geomorphological System Theory
von Elverfeldt, K. (2012) · Springer theses · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2822-6_11
Mobile devices in social contexts
Tscherning, H. (2011) · Deakin Research Online (Deakin University)
Design of change in cycle commuting
McKernon, S. (2007)
The Project-Based Company as an Autopoietic Knowledge System
Koskinen, K. U. (2010) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230298934_10
PROGRAMA DE MAESTRÍA Y DOCTORADO EN INGENIERÍA
Ingeniería, F. D. (2010)
Una introducción a los sistemas, los sistemas sociales y sistemas de conocimiento
González, A. C. T. (2005) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Complexity and communities: The application of complexity to community studies
Large, D. W. (2015) · Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)
Autopoiesis wiedzy organizacyjnej
Balcerak, A. (2010) · Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Myers, J. (2011) · Dialogues in critical management studies · doi:10.1108/s2046-6072(2011)0000001014
Modelling and measuring the dynamics of scientific communication
Lucio‐Arias, D. (2016)
Do it ourselves: Digital platform for self-organisation in urban planning - research through design
Mitish, H. (2018) · Tampere University of Technology Institutional Repository
Relational Basis of the Organism's Self-organization A Philosophical Discussion
Karaca, Ç. (2019) · Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter)
Training Company Self-Organization
Abramek, E. (2022) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-4503-7.ch012
The Magic Ring in Action: Organizations
Mella, P. (2021) · Contemporary systems thinking · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64194-8_9
Griffiths, D. A., Koukpaki, S., & Martin, B. Y. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-783-8.ch208
From Information Metabolism to Economic Intelligence
Dou, H., Juillet, A., & Clerc, P. (2019) · doi:10.1002/9781119612544.ch1
Griffiths, D. A., Koukpaki, S., & Martin, B. Y. (2013) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1782-7.ch006
Systems Thinking for the Control of Phenomena: How to Construct a Control System
Mella, P. (2012) · Perspectives in business culture · doi:10.1007/978-88-470-2565-3_3
A Review of Theories of Information Across Disciplines
Mingers, J., & Willcocks, L. P. (2023) · Technology, work and globalization · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34299-8_4
Gordillo, R. A. (2024) · Oñati Socio-legal Series · doi:10.35295/osls.iisl.1830 · Cited by 1
“Thus, an extensive and recognized scientific literature indicates that groups of people or business contexts do not function according to autopoietic criteria and dynamics (Mingers 2002, pp. 278–299; 2004, pp. 103–122; Fuchs and Hofkirchner 2009, pp. 111–129).”
BackgroundAmerican Institution of Public, K-12 Education: An Institutional Field Under a Complexity Paradigm
Joyalle, J. (2023) · PDXScholar (Portland State University) · doi:10.15760/etd.3699
Mental self‐renewal as a measure of systems thinking
Mononen, L., & Kujala, T. (2024) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.3017
“Since the underlying concepts are originally from the fields of physics and biology, they have been criticised in terms of their applicability in the context of human mental or social systems (see, e.g., Mingers, 1992, 2002).”
BackgroundDombrádi, K. (2024) · Belvedere Meridionale · doi:10.14232/belv.2024.1.15
Pure Sociology: Subjectivity at Risk?
Chriss, J. J. (2025) · Academicus International Scientific Journal · doi:10.7336/academicus.2025.31.02
Skapelsen av et potlatch – et innovativt uttrykk for takknemlighet, sorg og identitet
Heyse, C. (2025) · Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift · doi:10.18261/nat.36.2-3.9
A Philosophical Analysis of “Thinking Swarms”
Burken, C. B.-V. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82790-7_4
Definitions, Sources and Categorisations for Thinking Swarms
Burken, C. B.-V. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82790-7_3
Chen, Q., Chen, J., Magnusson, M. G., & Xiao, B. (2025) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.3217
Communication system for community-based tourism development in Magelang district
Satriya, C. Y., Wahyuni, H. I., & Sulastri, E. (2026) · Asian Anthropology · doi:10.1080/1683478x.2026.2616187
“Luhmann’s concept of autopoiesis, wherein social systems reproduce themselves through communication, provides a powerful framework for understanding how rural communities construct boundaries, identities, and adaptive strategies in the face of external complexity (Mingers 2002).”
A step towards understanding systems thinking as mental self-renewal
Mononen, L., Kallio, E. K., & Rousi, R. A. (2026) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102195
Service through communication—Conceptualizing service systems with Luhmann’s systems theory
Beverungen, D., Pöppelbuß, J., Hemmrich, S., & Iqbal, T. (2026) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-026-00889-w
Hunt, E., & Doyle, G. (2026) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2026.1854990
“Operationally, people undertake specific actions and make particular choices (Mingers, 2002).”
Multi-stakeholder social economy organizations and the circular economy
Tortia, E. (2026) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-01-2026-0389
A Systems-Theoretical Perspective on Organizational Learning in the Greek Educational System
Angelakou, E.-P., Κιούση, Σ., & Kodakos, A. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9420-6.ch001
Pehlivan, O. K. (2026) · International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique · doi:10.1007/s11196-026-10585-9
The Magic Ring in Action: Organizations
Mella, P. (2014) · Contemporary systems thinking · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05386-8_8
Metadata
- Authors
- Mingers, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mingers, John
- ORCID
- Mingers, John
- Venue
- The Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 278-299
- ISSN
- 0038-0261 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-954X
- OpenAlex
- W1978626743
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › German Social Sciences and History
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
- Keywords
- autopoiesis, social systems, Niklas Luhmann, second-order cybernetics, self-production, social theory, systems theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
