CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 133Reproductive Health and TechnologiesHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesMedicine, History, and Philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eager for medicalisation: the social production of infertility as a disease

Becker, Gay, Nachtigall, Robert D.·1992·Sociology of Health & Illness
DOI 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10493093
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The social and cultural basis of medicalisation is explored through an examination of infertility, a social condition that has recently been recast as a disease. Infertility illustrates a basic dilemma of medicalisation: the health care system reflects the same value system at work throughout society. Placing social problems within a biomedical framework does not provide a satisfactory solution for conditions that deviate from cultural norms because those norms are replicated in biomedical ideologies about the nature and treatment of disease. We examine three phases of this dilemma through an analysis of data collected in in‐depth interviews with 43 American couples who were undergoing infertility treatment: 1) the disparity between initial expectations about ease and speed of treatment and its actual complexity, 2) the confrontation with medical definitions of abnormality, and 3) the cumulative effects of treatment, in which emotional exhaustion from infertility treatment vies with the continuing need to ‘fix’ the infertility and produce a pregnancy. We conclude that individuals' efforts to eradicate feelings of abnormality for their childlessness by lending medical legitimacy to their failure to conceive are undermined by entering a medical system in which concepts of disease and abnormality are implicit.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10493093

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Becker G., 1986, The Dilemma of Difference: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Stigma
  2. Friedson Eliot, 1970, Profession of Medicine
  3. Gilligan Carol, 1982, In A Different Voice
  4. Laqueur T.A., 1987, The Making of the Modern Body
  5. Notman M., 1980, Mid‐Life Development and Clinical Issues
  6. Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress, 1988, Infertility: Medical and Social Choices

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Becker, G., & Nachtigall, R. D.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Sociology of Health & Illness
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-12
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
456-471
ISSN
  • 0141-9889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9566
DOI
10.1111/1467-9566.ep10493093
OpenAlex
W2014967909
Cited by
133
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 5688 d)
Locations
Sociology of Health & Illness (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
infertility, medicalization, social construction of illness, abnormality, childlessness, infertility treatment, emotional exhaustion, couples, pregnancy, medical legitimacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review