The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Developing Communities of Instructional Practice
Abstract
Many reforms today—including the small schools movement, efforts to build small learning communities, and teacher teaming structures—are based on the theory that organizing schools into smaller educational environments will help to build more collaborative and collegial communities of teachers, providing them with the autonomy and motivation to make better curricular and pedagogical decisions in the interests of their students and therefore improving student learning. Using multiple sources of data from a 4-year evaluation of a team-based schooling initiative in a medium-sized urban district, this study tests many of the assumptions underlying this theory. The results suggest that although these types of organizational reforms may succeed in improving the culture within which teachers teach, they alone are unlikely to improve instruction and student learning. The communities that develop are often not communities engaged in instructional improvement. For teacher communities to focus on instructional improvement, the author argues that communities need organizational structures, cultures of instructional exploration, and ongoing professional learning opportunities to support sustained inquiries into improving teaching and learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Accountability Policies and Teacher Decision Making: Barriers to the Use of Data to Improve Practice
Ingram, D., Louis, K. S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2004) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00379.x · Cited by 373
Saunders, W. M., Goldenberg, C. N., & Gallimore, R. (2009) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831209333185 · Cited by 293
Learning to learn from data: Benchmarks and instructional communities
Blanc, S., Christman, J. B., Liu, R., Mitchell, C., Travers, E., & Bulkley, K. E. (2010) · Peabody Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/01619561003685379 · Cited by 104
Farley-Ripple, E. N., & Buttram, J. L. (2014) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.006 · Cited by 79
Crosnoe, R., & Benner, A. D. (2015) · Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy407 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Supovitz, J. A.
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1591-1626
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W2076700803
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing Communities of Instructional Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9620.00214
- The paper
- Supovitz, J. A. (2002). Developing Communities of Instructional Practice. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.