The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inference in Molecular Population Genetics
Abstract
Summary: Full likelihood-based inference for modern population genetics data presents methodological and computational challenges. The problem is of considerable practical importance and has attracted recent attention, with the development of algorithms based on importance sampling (IS) and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. Here we introduce a new IS algorithm. The optimal proposal distribution for these problems can be characterized, and we exploit a detailed analysis of genealogical processes to develop a practicable approximation to it. We compare the new method with existing algorithms on a variety of genetic examples. Our approach substantially outperforms existing IS algorithms, with efficiency typically improved by several orders of magnitude. The new method also compares favourably with existing MCMC methods in some problems, and less favourably in others, suggesting that both IS and MCMC methods have a continuing role to play in this area. We offer insights into the relative advantages of each approach, and we discuss diagnostics in the IS framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations
Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787 · Cited by 6,045
Genomic Control for Association Studies
Devlin, B., & Roeder, K. (1999) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x · Cited by 3,162
Use of Unlinked Genetic Markers to Detect Population Stratification in Association Studies
Pritchard, J. K., & Rosenberg, N. A. (1999) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302449 · Cited by 1,198
Cited by
Drummond, A. J., Nicholls, G. K., Rodrigo, A. G., & Solomon, W. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/161.3.1307 · Cited by 1,059
Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms
Rosenberg, N. A., & Nordborg, M. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg795 · Cited by 750
Genome-Wide Inference of Ancestral Recombination Graphs
Rasmussen, M. D., Hubisz, M. J., Gronau, I., & Siepel, A. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004342 · Cited by 371
Lack of confidence in approximate Bayesian computation model choice
Robert, C. P., Cornuet, J.-M., Marin, J.-M., & Pillai, N. S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1102900108 · Cited by 317
Y genetic data support the Neolithic demic diffusion model
Chikhi, L., Nichols, R. A., Barbujani, G., & Beaumont, M. A. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.162158799 · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 605-635
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W2040640649
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 19.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inference in Molecular Population Genetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9868.00254
- The paper
- Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference in Molecular Population Genetics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00254
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.