Cited by 1,080EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningEducational and Psychological Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Patterns of Interaction in ESL Pair Work

Storch, Neomy·2002·Language Learning

DOI 10.1111/1467-9922.00179

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigated the nature of dyadic interaction in an adult ESL classroom. The study was longitudinal, classroom based, and examined the nature of interaction between 10 pairs of adult ESL students over a range of language tasks and over time (a semester). Four distinct patterns of dyadic interaction were found. These patterns are distinguishable in terms of equality and mutuality (Damon & Phelps, 1989). More importantly, the findings suggest that certain patterns of dyadic interaction are more conducive than others to language learning. These findings are explained by reference to Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9922.00179

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 999

Academic and linguistic gains during a semester-long study abroad: A cohort case study
Cai, W., Li, X., & Liu, M. (2013) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.4.4 · Cited by 10
“An increasing number of linguists have examined second/foreign language (SL/FL) learning and acquisition within Vygotsky’s (1978) sociocultural framework (Lantolf & Pavlenko, 1995; Nassaji & Swain, 2000; Pavlenko, 1998; Storch, 2002).”
Background
Intragroup Conflicts during Collaborative Writing in an ESL/EFL Preparatory Programme
Pathinathan, S., & Fung, Y. M. (2012) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature · doi:10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.7p.8 · Cited by 10
“Language instructors have been using collaborative writing at the tertiary levels (Lee, 2011; Luca & Tarricone, 2001; Storch, 2002, 2005, 2011; Yong 2010, 2011).”
Method
The effect of learner–learner interactions on a multiple-choice discourse completion task
Chen, Y. (2016) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.02.001 · Cited by 10
The Role of Traditional and Virtual Scaffolding in Developing Speaking Ability of Iranian EFL Learners
Mirahmadi, S. H., & Alavi, S. M. (2016) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v6n2p43 · Cited by 10
Review of selected research in applied linguistics published in Australia (2008–2014)
Oliver, R., Chen, H., & Moore, S. H. (2016) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444816000148 · Cited by 10
Individual, Pair and Group Writing Activity: A Case Study of Undergraduate EFL Student Writing
Kaweera, C., Yawiloeng, R., & Tachom, K. (2019) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v12n10p1 · Cited by 11
“It is noted from previous research both in L1 and L2 learners that joint production method is a way to foster reflective thinking (Storch, 2002; Storch, 2005).”
Result
Reflective learning practice for promoting adolescent EFL learners’ attention to form
Dao, P., Nguyen, M. X. N. C., & Chi, D. N. (2020) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2020.1766467 · Cited by 10
“On the other hand, the benefits of peer interaction to L2 learning are susceptible to a variety of contextual and social factors such as learners’ pair/group dynamics (Storch 2002), collaborative mindset – a disposition toward the need of being collaborative in interaction (Sato 2017b), learners’ perceptions of their…”
Background
PEER AND AUTOMATED WRITING EVALUATION (AWE): INDONESIAN EFL COLLEGE STUDENTS’ PREFERENCE FOR ESSAY EVALUATION
Ginting, R. S. B., & Fithriani, R. (2022) · LLT Journal A Journal on Language and Language Teaching · doi:10.24071/llt.v25i2.4879 · Cited by 10
“Peer scaffolding occurred when students worked in pairs (Levine et al., 2012; O’Neill & Russell, 2019; Storch, 2002), and peer evaluation increased interaction and co-construction of knowledge.”
Background
Exploring the use of student perspectives to inform topics in teacher education
Arnett, K. (2008) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 10
Negotiation for Meaning and Feedback among Language Learners
Cook, J. (2015) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.17507/jltr.0602.02 · Cited by 10
“These opportunities occur most frequently during NNS/NNS interactions (Pica, 1994; Varonis & Gass, 1985) and expert/novice interaction (Storch, 2002).”
Background
Promoting Noticing Through Collaborative Feedback Tasks in EFL College Writing Classrooms
Barnawi, O. Z. (2010) · International journal on teaching and learning in higher education · Cited by 10
Extroversion and group oral performance: A mixed quantitative and discourse analysis approach
Gan, Z. (2008) · Cited by 10
Public primary school teachers’ perceptions and assessment of young learners’ engagement
Dao, P., Bui, T. L. D., & Nguyen, M. X. N. C. (2024) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688241253546 · Cited by 16
“Social engagement relates particularly to the relationship among learners, especially in terms of reciprocity and mutuality (Storch, 2002) and interactiveness (Svalberg, 2009, 2018), and emotional/affective engagement is referred to as feelings, emotions or attitude toward the task, context, and…”
Beyond concordances: exploring GenAI-assisted data-driven learning for English periphrastic causative constructions from a sociocultural perspective
Yang, Y., & Lin, C. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2513988 · Cited by 12
Effect of Collaboration in Digital Game‐Based Learning: The Roles of Flow Experience and Intrinsic Motivation
Cai, Z., Liu, C., Zhan, J., Wang, Z., Hao, X., Zhang, S., & Chen, X. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.70065 · Cited by 14
Cross-curricular connection in collaborative digital multimodal composing process: insights from translanguaging and transpositioning perspectives
Choi, K. C. K., & Tai, K. W. H. (2025) · Language and Education · doi:10.1080/09500782.2025.2540949 · Cited by 9
“…interaction has long been recognised as beneficial for L2 learning, such as offering students opportunities to co-construct knowledge, receive feedback from their peers and engage in peer scaffolding to enhance understanding and use of target language (Storch 2002; Philp et al. 2014).”
Exploring EFL Learners’ Comments on Web-Based Peer Feedback: Local and Global Revisions
Al-Abri, A. (2021) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v14n6p114 · Cited by 9
“In L2 writing classrooms, peer feedback tasks are likely to engage learners to provide revisions and corrections on each other’s use of language (Storch, 2002; Swain & Lapkin, 1998).”
Background
Pair dynamics and language-related episodes in child EFL task-based peer interaction
Pladevall‐Ballester, E. (2021) · Language Teaching for Young Learners · doi:10.1075/ltyl.20007.pla · Cited by 9
The Adoption of Task-Based Language Teaching in Diverse Contexts
Newton, J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.036 · Cited by 9
Technology-Mediated Task-Based Language Teaching
González‐Lloret, M., & Ziegler, N. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.019 · Cited by 18
EFL Teacher Questions to Scaffold Learning Process: A Conversation Analytic Study
Yaqubi, B., & Mozaffari, F. (2010) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 8
The role of L1 use by high-proficiency learners in L2 vocabulary development
Sato, M., & Angulo, I. (2020) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.55.02sat · Cited by 10
A Case Study of ASEAN EFL Learners’ Collaborative Writing and Small Group Interaction Patterns in Google Docs
Kitjaroonchai, N., & Suppasetseree, S. (2021) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v14n5p89 · Cited by 9
“The work of Li (2014), Li and Kim (2016), and Storch (2002) was used as a guide to investigate interaction patterns to answer Research Question 1.”
BackgroundMethod
Challenges Encountered During Synchronous Online Collaborative Writing via Google Docs
Irshad, M. (2021) · International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies · doi:10.4018/ijwltt.287554 · Cited by 9
“…tool and the interest in using it for teaching writing is apparent, the aim of this research was to conduct a study to investigate the problems/challenges of synchronous on-line collaborative writing when learners interact linguistically (Storch, 2002) in small groups to complete a writing task.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Investigations into EFL Students’ Pragmatic and Grammatical Awareness through Peer Collaboration
Chiu, E. F.-Y., Chen, Y., & Tai, H. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141710568 · Cited by 9
Improving Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing through Task-based Collaboration
Hosseinpour, N., & Biria, R. (2014) · Theory and Practice in Language Studies · doi:10.4304/tpls.4.11.2428-2435 · Cited by 9
“…researchers applying sociocultural theory to the study of L2 learning maintain that learners can have a positive impact on each other’s development because they can act as both novices and experts since no two learners have the same strength and weaknesses (Donato, 1994; Ohta, 2001; Storch, 2002).”
Background
To Challenge the Unchallenged: Potential of Non-"Standard" Englishes for Japanese EFL Learners
Miyagi, K., Sato, M., & Crump, A. (2009) · Cited by 9
The Nature of Peer Interaction: Role Relationships Formed in Pair Interaction
Kim, Y. (2017) · English Teaching · doi:10.15858/engtea.72.1.201703.131 · Cited by 9
“As Storch (2002) mentions, Donato’s findings are significant for research on peer interaction in that the findings emphasise the need to take into consideration the type of peer interaction functioning in any research on peer interaction.”
BackgroundInfluential
Emotional scaffolding in text chats between Japanese language learners and native Japanese speakers
Yoshida, R. (2020) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12477 · Cited by 12
Interaction in collaborative writing between international and domestic students in an Indonesian university
Rahayu, D. (2020) · Studies in English Language and Education · doi:10.24815/siele.v7i1.15773 · Cited by 9
“For the analysis, this study applied the stages of content analysis: coding, categorizing, and interpreting, which were also used by Storch (2002) as the method of her study on pattern of interaction on ESL pair work.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Curriculum Design and Language Learning: An Analysis of English Textbooks in Brazil
Rodrigues, E. N. (2015) · Digital Commons - Andrews University (Andrews University) · doi:10.32597/dissertations/1/ · Cited by 9
Tasks in action in Vietnamese EFL high school classrooms: The role of rehearsal and performance in teaching and learning through oral tasks
Nguyen, T. B. T. (2013) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17006113 · Cited by 8
An Interactionist Approach to Learner–learner Interaction in Second and Foreign Language Classrooms
Bowles, M. A., & Adams, R. J. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118531242.ch12 · Cited by 9
The effects of completing collaborative or independent writing on the development of language use in individual writing
Davison, I. (2024) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101128 · Cited by 8
TBLT , Engagement, and Group Synchronicity: Exploring the Relationships between Affective, Social, and Cognitive Aspects of Task‐Based Performance
Sato, M., Salas, G., Freeborn, L., & Tajabadi, A. (2025) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.3408 · Cited by 12
Exploring immediate and prolonged effects of collaborative writing on young learners’ texts: L2 versus FL
Villarreal, I., & Sánchez, A. M. (2023) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2022-0062 · Cited by 10
Inclusivity, friendship and language learning: boosting collaboration in interactive groups
Santiago-Garabieta, M., Zubiri-Esnaola, H., García-Carrión, R., & Gairal‐Casadó, R. (2023) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2023.2189433 · Cited by 11
“Nevertheless, it does not appear to be the case that difference in levels between peers is typically a factor that causes difficulties (Storch 2001); however, what does seem to be decisive is the type of interaction (Storch 2002a).”
Background
Complexity Theory and Child Protection and Welfare: A Tool of Hindsight and/or a Tool to Assist Improved Decision Making in Child Protection and Welfare Work
Gillen, A., & Canavan, J. (2023) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcad180 · Cited by 8
THE EFFECT OF COLLABORATION ON OMANI STUDENTS’ WRITING: A COMPARISON BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL, PAIR AND GROUP WORK
Tai, Y. A. (2015) · European Scientific Journal ESJ · Cited by 8
How Proficiency-Pairing Affects Students’ Peer-Mediated Revisions of EFL Writing: Three Case Studies
Wang, W. (2015) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v8n5p22 · Cited by 8
Interaction in a Constructivist Classroom in a Malaysian Undergraduate ESL Setting
Dass, L. C., & Ferguson, P. (2011) · Malaysian Journal of ELT Research · Cited by 8
High Schools as Crucibles of College Prep: What More Do We Need to Know?
Otte, G. (2002) · Journal of Basic Writing · doi:10.37514/jbw-j.2002.21.2.08 · Cited by 9
Paired learning duration and character strengths use as predictors of learning satisfaction: a dyadic longitudinal study among Chevruta students in Yeshivas
Littman‐Ovadia, H., & Freidlin, P. (2021) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-021-00690-y · Cited by 8
The use of face-to-face and mobile assisted peer tutoring in solving the language problems of Syrian refugees
Tanrıkulu, F. (2021) · Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning · doi:10.1080/13611267.2021.1912469 · Cited by 8
“Peer tutoring, which is one of the groups and couple studies, is commonly used in education (Storch, 2002), at all levels (Bierman & Furman, 1981; Duran, Flores, Oller, & Ramírez, 2019).”
Background
'Everything we do revolves around the exam': What are students’ perceptions and experiences of learning Welsh as a second language in Wales?
Rhys, M., & Smith, K. (2022) · Cylchgrawn Addysg Cymru / Wales Journal of Education · doi:10.16922/wje.24.1.1 · Cited by 9
Encouraging Second Language Use in Cooperative Learning Groups
Jacobs, G. M., & Kimura, H. (2013) · doi:10.33508/bw.v1i1.369 · Cited by 8
Predisposition to choose: the language of an information gap task in a multilingual primary classroom
Dufficy, P. (2004) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168804lr145oa · Cited by 8
“Further to actual content and design, pairs were selected to match children in what was thought might be productive combinations (see Storch, 2002, and Oliver, 2002, for discussions on productive groupings).”
Background
Chapter 7. Languaging in wiki-based collaborative writing:
Li, M.-M. (2020) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.55.07li · Cited by 8
Peer Feedback in Second Language Oral Interaction
Iwashita, N., & Dao, P. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108589789.014 · Cited by 8
From problem-orientedness to goal-orientedness: Re-conceptualizing communication strategies as forms of intra-mental and inter-mental mediation
Chang, S., & Liu, Y. (2016) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.07.009 · Cited by 8
“main focus of sociocultural studies on inter-mental mediation (Ohta, 2001; Storch, 2002; Swain, 2000; Swain et al., 2002).”
BackgroundInfluential
INVESTIGATING STUDENTS’ WRITING QUALITY WITH DIFFERENT PROFICIENCY LEVELS IN INTERACTION-BASED PAIR WORKS
Styati, E. W., & Rodliyah, R. S. (2021) · Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.17509/ijal.v11i1.34659 · Cited by 8
The impact of interactive discussions on L2 Chinese composition writing
Liao, J. (2010) · doi:10.17077/etd.s29hekty · Cited by 8
“L2 22 learners pool their linguistic resources and ideas and also provide feedback to each other, thus composing more linguistically complex and grammatically accurate texts (Storch 2002, 2005).”
Background
Collaborative Language Learning
Storch, N. (2018) · The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0153.pub2 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
'Who expresses an honest opinion as it stands in Japan?': cultural issues and Japanese L2 students' experiences of face-to-face and anonymous peer review
Kim, S. (2023) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2022.2073983 · Cited by 7
“…(e.g., Villamil & de Guerrero, 1996), L2 learners often use their L1 to activate a higher degree of cooperation and mutuality – ‘the level of engagement with each other’s contribution’ (Storch, 2002, p. 127) – or to address their affective need to mitigate negative feedback (Kim & Chang, 2022).”
Background
Behind the scenes: exploring learners’ collaborative writing interactions and strategies
Alsahil, A. A. (2022) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2022.2157444 · Cited by 7
“…themselves, others, and the world (Lantolf et al., 2015) In the L2 realm, social interaction plays a pivotal role in language learning: knowledge is built and constructed through engaging in joint activities that involve deliberation about language-related problems (Donato, 1994; Storch, 2002).”
Influential
Enhancing Young Learners’ Peer Collaboration: Pedagogical Ideas for Language Teachers
Kos, T. (2024) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.3344 · Cited by 7
Learning to talk and talking to learn: how spontaneous teacher-learner interaction in the secondary foreign languages classroom provides greater opportunities for L2 learning.
Hawkes, R. (2012) · Cited by 7
Perspectives: To Challenge the Unchallenged: Potential of Non-“Standard” Englishes for Japanese EFL Learners
Miyagi, K., Sato, M., & Crump, A. (2009) · JALT Journal · doi:10.37546/jaltjj31.2-6 · Cited by 7
“Although Japan has never been physically colonized and forced to use English, the postwar willingness to accept Anglo-centric language and culture without question prevails (Suzuki, 1999). Tsuda (1990) warns that Japanese EFL learners are being “mentally” colonized by this process.”
BackgroundMethod
Revisiting Proficiency Pairing in Collaborative Writing From an Equity Theory Perspective: Voices From High-Proficiency EFL Learners
Chen, W., & Lee, Y. (2022) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440221087267 · Cited by 7
“Researchers have investigated language learning opportunities by focusing on analyzing patterns of interaction (Storch, 2002) and “languaging” opportunities that collaborative writing can afford learners (Swain, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluential
The Effects of Different Task Types on Learners’ Performance in Collaborative Virtual Learning Environment
Yadollahi, H., & Rahimi, A. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.083 · Cited by 7
Observing language-related episodes in intact classrooms
Collins, L. J., & White, J. L. (2019) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.52.02col · Cited by 7
“I Know There's Something Like That in Spanish”: Heritage Language Learners' Multifaceted Interactions with Linguistically Diverse Peers
Martin‐Beltrán, M., García, A. A., & Montoya‐Ávila, A. (2020) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12310 · Cited by 8
Exploring young learners’ L2 development and perceptions of mixed-age and same-age peer interactions in EFL mixed-age classrooms
Kos, T. (2021) · European Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/eujal-2020-0001 · Cited by 8
The Psycholinguistics of Task-Based Performance
Skehan, P. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.002 · Cited by 9
Patterns of interaction in peer response: the relationship between pair dynamics and revision outcomes
Roberson, A. (2022) · Digital Archive @ GSU · doi:10.57709/6430660 · Cited by 7
The Effects of Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Scaffolding on University Students' Grammar Acquisition
Izanlu, M., & Feyli, M. (2015) · Cited by 7
Collaborative Interaction as the Process of Task Completion in Task-Based CALL classrooms
Tanaka, N. (2005) · Cited by 7
Understanding Group-based Learning in an Academic Context : Rwandan Students’ Reflections on Collaborative Writing and Peer Assessment
Mutwarasibo, F. (2013) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 7
The Impact of Wiki-based Collaborative Writing on English L2 Learners' Individual Writing Development
Caruso, G. (2014) · doi:10.15760/etd.2003 · Cited by 11
“In a similar vein, Storch (2002) examined various patterns of didactic interaction and the impact the nature of the interaction had on L2 development outcomes over time.”
Background
The implementation of task-based language teaching in EFL primary school classrooms: A case study in Vietnam
Bui, T. (2019) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17136320 · Cited by 6
Editorial
Mayo, M. D. P. G. (2021) · Language Teaching for Young Learners · doi:10.1075/ltyl.00022.edi · Cited by 7
Preface The Origins and Growth of Task-Based Language Teaching
Long, M. H., & Ahmadian, M. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.001 · Cited by 9
Enhancing young EFL learners’ written skills: the role of repeated pre-task planning
Gómez, J. G., Orcasitas-Vicandi, M., & Kopinska, M. (2024) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2023-0144 · Cited by 8
The influence of task complexity and task modality on learners’ topic and turn management
Ren, W., Peng, Y., & Wu, Y. (2023) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2023-0040 · Cited by 6
Exploring the potential of brief peer review training in enhancing student feedback literacy
Man, D., Chau, M. H., Zainal, A. Z., & Rummy, J. T. (2024) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2023-0278 · Cited by 6
“The positive e ﬀ ect of peer feedback comes from student reviewers ’ input on the writing under evaluation and the peer interactions wherein the feedback givers and recipients negotiate meanings related to the writing topic (Storch 2002).”
Social Software in the Classroom: The Case of Wikis for Scaffolding
Ahmadi, S. D., & Marandi, S. S. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.394 · Cited by 7
Collaborative dialogue: opportunities and challenges in vocabulary acquisition and retention of threshold EFL learners
Ahmadian, M., & Tajabadi, A. (2018) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2017-0175 · Cited by 6
Collaborative Discussion Using Padlet to Enhance the Teaching and Learning of Essay Writing in Mandarin Language
Yap, T. T., Zainal, A. Z., Vasodavan, V., & Kui-Ling, E. L. (2020) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-3062-7.ch009 · Cited by 6
Connecting Teacher Training to Task-Based Language Teaching Implementation
Bryfonski, L. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.027 · Cited by 7
Child Interaction in Task-Supported EFL/CLIL Contexts
Mayo, M. D. P. G. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.023 · Cited by 6
Exploring Situated Learning through Task based Activities: A Case Study in the Mandarin Class
Sim, M. S., Rahmat, N. H., & Khin, L. S. (2021) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i12/11374 · Cited by 6
“As explained by Storch (2002), “when the learners engage with tasks, they bring with them particular dispositions and notions of how the task might be approached”.”
Background
“Are There Any Mexicans Listening?” Stancetaking and Language Ideologies in a Spanish L2 Classroom
Mattson‐Prieto, R., & Showstack, R. E. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12485 · Cited by 6
Multilingual doctoral students' lived experiences of genre knowledge development through social interactions: Learning writing ‘styles’ and ‘thought processes’
Mochizuki, N. (2022) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101181 · Cited by 6
The Effects of EFL Learners’ Attitudes on Participation and Learning During Collaborative Writing
Mozaffari, S. H. (2023) · Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language--TESL-EJ · doi:10.55593/ej.27106a5 · Cited by 6
“Equality deals with “the degree of control or authority over a task”, and mutuality concerns “the level of engagement with each other’s contribution” (Storch, 2002, p. 127).”
BackgroundResultInfluential
AN ACTIVITY THEORY PERSPECTIVE ON TASK-BASED INSTRUCTION IN A UNIVERSITY BUSINESS EFL CLASS IN THAILAND: A SOCIOCULTURAL CASE STUDY
Sirisatit, R. (2010) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 6
Computer-based Assessment of Foreign Language Speaking Skills
Araújo, L. (2010) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2788/30519 · Cited by 6
Promoting University Students’ Collaborative Learning through Instructor-guided Writing Groups
Mutwarasibo, F. (2013) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v2n3p1 · Cited by 6
“Compared to other studies on group writing (Dobao, 2012; Shehadeh, 2011; Storch, 2002, 2005) this study has investigated the nature of student collaboration in a writing classroom by specifically looking at the type of learning that takes place when an instructor is involved.”
Influential
Age and knowledge of morphosyntax in english as an additional language: grammatical judgment and error correction
Qureshi, M. A. (2018) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2015-0062 · Cited by 6
Oral interactions in a writing group as mediating artefacts
Mochizuki, N. (2016) · Australian Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/aral.39.2.05moc · Cited by 6
Using Learning Analytics to Support Engagement in Collaborative Writing
Liu, M., Pardo, A., & Liu, L. (2017) · International Journal of Distance Education Technologies · doi:10.4018/ijdet.2017100105 · Cited by 6
Peer assistance among mixed-age pairs in mixed-age EFL secondary school classrooms in Germany
Kos, T. (2017) · European Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/eujal-2017-0013 · Cited by 9
“…the main moderating factors of collaborative work, but the relationship between pair members, the pattern of interaction co-constructed by both learners and their perceptions of the partner’s language competence that might have greater impact (Storch 2002; Watanabe and Swain 2007; Watanabe 2008).”
Background
Languaging when providing and processing peer feedback
Storch, N., & Alshuraidah, A. (2020) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.55.05sto · Cited by 6
Self-citation
COMPUTER-ASSISTED COLLABORATIVE WRITING AND STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF GOOGLE DOCS AND WIKIS: A REVIEW PAPER
Alwahoub, H. M., Azmi, M. N. L., & Halabieh, M. (2020) · LANGUAGE LITERACY Journal of Linguistics Literature and Language Teaching · doi:10.30743/ll.v4i1.2499 · Cited by 6
“php/languageliteracy 18 Nationally Accredited and indexed in DOAJ learners’ accuracy (Dobao 2012; Wigglesworth & Storch, 2009; McDonough & García, 2015; Storch & Wigglesworth, 2007). In another study about Colombian EFL learners, that compared students’ texts which were written collaboratively and those written indivi…”
Influential
Collaborative Writing on Google Docs: Taiwanese Students’ Participation, Behaviors, and Writing Trajectories with Real-work Online Tasks
Yeh, S. F. (2021) · Advances in Language and Literary Studies · doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.3.p.73 · Cited by 6
“Following on collaborative writing researchers, Storch (2002) and Watanabe (2008) examined patterns of interaction in pair writing by setting up mutuality and equality with four different interaction patterns, and they found that the collaborative pattern of expert/novice was more con - ducive to…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Exploring Primary-School EFL Teacher Expertise in Scaffolding: A Comparative Study
Li, W., & Zou, W. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211061574 · Cited by 6
“…scaffolding via the use of language during contingent and collaborative teacherstudent interactions (Ellis & Barkhuizen, 2012; Lantolf & Poehner, 2014; Storch, 2002; Swain, 2000; Walqui, 2006; Wood et al., 1976) so as to constantly diagnose, build, and actualize learning within learner’s ZPD.”
Background
Managing CMC-based Task through Text-based Dialogue: An Exploratory Study in a Chinese EFL Context
Yu, L., & Zeng, G. (2011) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v4n4p221 · Cited by 6
“…when they worked on a text-reconstruction task, “in which students were presented with content words and had to insert function words (e.g., prepositions, articles) and change word forms (e.g., for tense morphology) to produce a meaningful and grammatically correct text” (Storch, 2002, p. 125).”
Background
IMPACT OF SYNCHRONOUS COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION ON EFL LEARNERS’ COLLABORATION: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
Pour, A. M., & Tahriri, A. (2016) · Journal of teaching language skills · doi:10.22099/jtls.2016.3616 · Cited by 6
Promoting University Students' Engagement in Learning Through Instructor‐Initiated EFL Writing Groups
Mutwarasibo, F. (2013) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.127 · Cited by 6
O diálogo colaborativo como ação potencial para a aprendizagem de línguas
Lima, M. D. S., & Costa, P. D. S. C. (2010) · Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada · doi:10.1590/s0103-18132010000100012 · Cited by 6
Relationship between Higher-Order Thinking Skills and L2 Performance
Toyoda, E. (2015) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) · Cited by 6

Authors: Storch, N.
Affiliations: The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author: Storch, Neomy
ORCID: Storch, Neomy
Venue: Language Learning
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2002-03
Volume: 52
Issue: 1
Pages: 119-158
ISSN: 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
1467-9922
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00179
OpenAlex: W2092002315
Cited by: 1,080
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 68 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 35
FWCI: 82.24
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 291 d)
Locations: Language Learning (publishedVersion)
Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
Keywords: dyadic interaction, pair work, ESL learners, adult language learners, interaction patterns, Vygotsky, cognitive development, classroom interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Patterns of Interaction in ESL Pair Work

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks