Cited by 1,080EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningEducational and Psychological Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Patterns of Interaction in ESL Pair Work

Storch, Neomy·2002·Language Learning

DOI 10.1111/1467-9922.00179

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigated the nature of dyadic interaction in an adult ESL classroom. The study was longitudinal, classroom based, and examined the nature of interaction between 10 pairs of adult ESL students over a range of language tasks and over time (a semester). Four distinct patterns of dyadic interaction were found. These patterns are distinguishable in terms of equality and mutuality (Damon & Phelps, 1989). More importantly, the findings suggest that certain patterns of dyadic interaction are more conducive than others to language learning. These findings are explained by reference to Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9922.00179

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 999

“The Computer Gives Us Lots of Ideas”: Exploring Children's Multimodal Writing Process
Williams, S. C. P., Flint, A. S., & Rohloff, R. (2025) · Writing & Pedagogy · doi:10.3138/wap-26257-williams · Cited by 1
Students’ perspectives on Facebook and Instagram ELT opportunities: a comparative study
Shahini, A. (2025) · Language Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1515/cercles-2024-0034 · Cited by 2
Migrant Students’ Emotions and Perceptions of collaborative writing: The role of educational setting, educational level and (non-)migrant background
Paspali, A., & Papadopoulou, D. (2025) · Journal of Language Teaching · doi:10.54475/jlt.2025.006 · Cited by 1
Collaborative Writing and Learning of Reported Speech During Mixed‐Age Peer Interactions in English as a Foreign Language Classroom
Kos, T., & Lara, F. Z. (2025) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12810 · Cited by 1
Written languaging in web-based collaborative L2 writing tasks
Hsu, H.-C. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2571701 · Cited by 1
EFL Learners’ behavioral engagement with teacher written corrective feedback: The effect of patterns of dyadic interaction
Mozaffari, S. H. (2025) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688251393869 · Cited by 1
Shared authorship in the making: Students’ perspectives on collaborative writing
Szabó, G., Turai, R. K., & Bodó, C. (2026) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/j.linged.2025.101490 · Cited by 1
Peer collaborative learning and academic engagement in university libraries: a moderated mediation model and latent profile analysis
Tang, H., & Shen, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1759026 · Cited by 5
“Storch (2002) proposed a two-dimensional framework for assessing the quality of collaborative interaction: ﬁrst, the task dimension, which refers to the extent to which group members focus on the learning task itself, including asking questions, explaining concepts, and constructing arguments— what…”
Interaction patterns and network structure in language learning communities
Ghaemı, H., & Bahrami, A. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2026.2615189 · Cited by 1
How engagement dynamics shape collaborative writing processes: Perspectives from EAL learners
Cao, Z., Ruegg, R., & Skalicky, S. (2026) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2026.103997 · Cited by 1
Introduction to Learner Engagement in Context
Qiu, X. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-8311-9_1 · Cited by 1
Student-student cooperation promotes diversity, inclusion, and the SDGs in language education
Díaz, A., & Lise, M. (2026) · AILA Review · doi:10.1075/aila.25040.jac · Cited by 1
The Effect of Negotiation of Meaning on the Accuracy in EFL Writing
Youhanaee, M., Tehrani, A. R., & Piri, F. (2012) · Theory and Practice in Language Studies · doi:10.4304/tpls.2.5.972-979 · Cited by 1
“Research conducted with L2 learners (e.g., Donato, 1988; DiCamilla & Anton, 1997; Storch, 2002; Swain & Lapkin, 1998) has shown that in the process of co-authoring, learners consider not only grammatical accuracy and lexis but also discourse.”
BackgroundResult
Dyadic Interaction in Writing: On-line or Off-line Feedback?
Behnam, B., & Davaribina, M. (2011) · Cited by 1
A Microgenetic Analysis of Language Related Episodes (LREs) in EFL Beginner Classes: a Case for Collaborative Poetry-Reading Task
Khatib, M., Miri, M., & Tabataba, A. (2013) · Cited by 1
Investigation of Small Group Interaction in a Korean University EFL Classroom
Ko, M. H. (2008) · English Teaching Practice & Critique · Cited by 1
Integrating culture into a Business English course: Students’ perspective on a collaborative online writing project
Kovačić, A., Orehovački, T., & Bubaš, G. (2012) · Cited by 1
I: FOUNDATIONS
DEKEYSER, R. M. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667275.003 · Cited by 1
Perceptions on Distance Peer Feedback in a Korean EFL Writing Context
유호정 (2014) · Studies in Foreign Language Education · doi:10.16933/sfle.2014.28.2.25 · Cited by 1
Effects of Computer-Enhanced and Regular Types of Gradual Release of Responsibility Writing Instruction
Lee, J. W. (2012) · STEM Journal · doi:10.16875/stem.2012.13.2.81 · Cited by 1
A percepção de jovens aprendizes de segunda língua em relação à prática de revisão por pares em produção escrita
Spinassé, K. P., & Bolzan, D. B. (2016) · Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language Literatures in English and Cultural Studies · doi:10.5007/2175-8026.2016v69n1p95 · Cited by 1
“…de treinamento dos participantes (BERG, 1999; HANSEN; LIU, 2005; MIN, 2006), os critérios de formação das duplas ou grupos e os padrões de colaboração desenvolvidos pelas mesmas (ROLLINSON, 2005; STORCH, 2002; VILLAMIL; GUERRERO, 1996), assim como os métodos a serem utilizados (ROLLINSON, 2005).”
Background
Effects of Pair/Group Work on English Vocabulary Acquisition
Jang, Y.-S. (2015) · The Journal of the Korea Contents Association · doi:10.5392/jkca.2015.15.07.629 · Cited by 1
Reading Strategies for the Science Subject in Upper Elementary Classes that Follow English CBI in Northern Lebanon
Yaacoub, M. (2017) · American Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12691/education-5-5-8 · Cited by 1
Exploring How to Ensure Participation in CBI
AeJinKang (2018) · Journal of the Korea English Education Society · doi:10.18649/jkees.2018.17.2.1 · Cited by 1
Communication Strategies as Forms of Mediation: Toward a Sociocultural Approach to Language Learning
Chang, S. (2015) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.40975 · Cited by 1
The Effects of Focus on Form in CMC: A Case Study of Korean Adult Learners
Hong, A. R., & Lee, C.-H. (2008) · Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.15702/mall.2008.11.2.9 · Cited by 1
Promoting Counterargument in Student’s Argumentative Writing: A Dialogic Approach
Sueb, Hartanti, L. P., & Ayu, H. R. (2019) · Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Conference (SOSHEC) · doi:10.2991/soshec-19.2019.46 · Cited by 1
“In addition, students perceive the dialogue process allowed them to engage in collaborative writing process [10], predicting the opposing view, which is good for Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 380”
Background
Social Autonomy and Decision Making in L2 Group Work
Feick, D. (2018) · Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal · doi:10.37237/090304 · Cited by 1
“The deductive-inductive interaction analysis used the (sub-)categories of peer interaction developed by Storch (2001, 2002a, 2002b), for example requests, questions, simultaneous talk, repetitions, co-construction, and collective scaffolding.”
BackgroundMethod
Effects of Audio-Visually Prompted Collaborative Dialogue on EFL Learners' Listening Comprehension Development
Beheshti, S., & Safa, M. A. (2020) · doi:10.22099/jtls.2020.37967.2858 · Cited by 1
“…kinds of learner groupings and patterns of interaction are more helpful for L2 learning than others (e.g., Kowal & Swain, 1994, 1997; Leeser, 2004; Storch, 2001, 2002; Yule & Macdonald, 1990), the efficacy of collaborative dialogue for the improvement of L2 learners' listening skill has rarely…”
BackgroundInfluential
Task-Based Testing and Assessment
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108643689.014 · Cited by 2
Perceptions and Noticing of Corrective Feedback
Yoshida, R. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108589789.030 · Cited by 2
Samskrivande i virtuell lärmiljö
Hansell, K., & Pörn, M. (2021) · Nordand · doi:10.18261/issn.2535-3381-2021-01-01 · Cited by 1
Questions, Challenges and the Future
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108643689.020 · Cited by 1
A Task-Based Language Needs Analysis of Syrian Refugee Parents in Turkey
Toker, Ş., & Sağdıç, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.007 · Cited by 1
Comparing the Effectiveness of Task-Based Language Teaching and Presentation-Practice-Production on Second Language Grammar Learning
Borro, I. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.031 · Cited by 3
The Adolescent Language Learner: Setting the Scene
Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Feick, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108869812.002 · Cited by 3
New Landscape of L2 Writing and Theoretical Frameworks
Li, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87710-1_2 · Cited by 1
A Sociocultural Approach to Interactions among Beginning Learners of Chinese as A Foreign Language: Implications for Teachers of Chinese to Speakers of Other Languages
(2020) · International Journal of Chinese Language Teaching · doi:10.46451//ijclt.2020.09.02 · Cited by 1
“For instance, Kowal and Swain (1994) revealed that pairing learners with similar linguistic ability was more effective for learning, whereas the opposite way was true in Storch (2002).”
Background
Introduction
Devos, N. J. (2015) · Educational linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22219-6_1 · Cited by 1
Discourse Analysis of ESL Undergraduate Students’ Patterns of Interaction in an Online Peer Feedback Environment to Develop Writing Performance
Baharudin, M. D., & Razali, A. B. (2022) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v12n5p283 · Cited by 1
Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) in Japanese EFL Contexts
Moore, P. J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-2327-1_151-1 · Cited by 1
MEDIAZIONE E PROCESSI DI APPRENDIMENTO E USO DI UNA LINGUA SECONDA IN UN’ATTIVITÀ DI SCRITTURA: L’ESEMPIO DEL DICTOGLOSS
Pedrazzini, L. (2023) · Italiano LinguaDue · doi:10.54103/2037-3597/19576 · Cited by 1
Raising Language Awareness of EFL Learners in Student-Centered Classroom
Huang, R. (2022) · doi:10.2991/978-2-494069-02-2_73 · Cited by 2
The Role of Mediating Artifacts on the Writing Development of Students Through Scaffolding Instruction: The Case of Iran
Bagherpour, N., & Jalilzadeh, K. (2023) · Springer briefs in education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25006-4_6 · Cited by 1
Exploring the Multifaceted Roles of Non-Native English-Speaking Teachers (NNEST) in Enhancing participants' Speaking Proficiency
Quaidy, G. M., Khairani, Z., Isakov, E., & Kalambekov, A. (2023) · Jurnal Educative Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.30983/educative.v8i1.6279 · Cited by 1
A comparative analysis of language choices in written peer feedback provided by high- and low-proficiency Japanese EFL students
Kim, S. (2023) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688231193074 · Cited by 1
“…factors such as the participants’ peer feedback stances (Yu & Lee, 2015), affective states (Sato, 2017), or social relationships between the interactants (Storch, 2002; Storch & Aldosari, 2013; Yu & Hu, 2017a) were not taken into account, which also restricts the generalizability of the findings.”
Peer response in Chinese as a foreign language context: A classroom-based case study
Zhu, W. Y., & Qin, X. (2022) · Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching · doi:10.56040/wzxq1926 · Cited by 2
“…interaction and scaffolding, second language learning research exploring peer interaction from a sociocultural theoretical perspective has shown that students are capable of engaging in collective or mutual scaffolding (Donato, 1994; de Guerrero & Villamil, 2000; Storch, 2002).”
MALL‐based collaborative writing in second language classroom: A systematic review
Wang, L. (2023) · Future in Educational Research · doi:10.1002/fer3.18 · Cited by 1
Exploring Interaction Patterns in Web-Based Collaborative Writing Tasks Among Advanced L2 Learners: A Case Study Using Feishu Platform
Liu, Q., & Zhou, S. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4246-2_4 · Cited by 1
The effect of collaboration on the adolescent EFL learners’ writing performance
Bllaca, N., & Dalton‐Puffer, C. (2024) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2024.2403478 · Cited by 3
“This seems to indicate that our participants formed different patterns of interaction and possibly exhibited different levels of engagement in LREs across types (Azkarai and Kopinska 2020; Storch 2002; 2008), but without a more rigorous analysis, this interpretation should be taken with caution.”
An investigation of the language learning opportunities in collaborative dialogues during tabletop game play
Reid, R. D. (2024) · Ludic Language Pedagogy · doi:10.55853/llp_v6art2 · Cited by 1
Patterns of interaction during peer feedback exchange in online EFL writing lessons
Tütüncüoğlu, Ö. C., & Koç, D. K. (2024) · Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning · doi:10.31681/jetol.1493104 · Cited by 1
Positive Institutions in Second Language Learning: Using a Social Environment Lens
Padilla, A. M., & Chen, X. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-95136-7_5 · Cited by 1
Introducing Peer Collaboration in a Networked English Writing Class
Zhao, H. (2013) · Advances in mobile and distance learning book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4486-1.ch005 · Cited by 1
Learner-Learner Interaction: An Exploration of the Mediating Functions of Multilingual Learners? Languages in an L3 Foreign Language Classroom
Payant, C. (2022) · Digital Archive @ GSU · doi:10.57709/3092374 · Cited by 1
Pre-service Chinese English as A Foreign Language (EFL) Teachers Perceptions about Implementation of Communicative Language Teaching
Zhang, H. (2014) · UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico) · Cited by 1
Sociocultural Identity DevelopmentScaffolded byCollaboration-ConduciveStrategies:A Case of an Iranian EFL Writing Class
Soozandehfar, S. M. A., & Sahragard, R. (2015) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 1
Chinese College Students' Abilities and Attitudes for Peer Review
Jie, Z. (2011) · Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cjal.2011.033 · Cited by 1
“Storch (2002) categorizes the dyadic interaction in ESL classrooms into four kinds: collaborative, dominant/dominant, dominant/passive, and expert/novice.”
Background
Quality Learning In Large Classes
Basorun, J. O. (2013) · Cited by 1
Exploring the Effects of Error Correction versus Reformulation on Students’ Revision in a Collaborative Writing Context
Hwang, J. (2014) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.17936/pkelt.2014.26.4.001 · Cited by 1
Perceptions about Reading to Write and Its Practices of in an L2 Writing Course
Yu, H.-J. (2016) · Advanced science and technology letters · doi:10.14257/astl.2016.127.17 · Cited by 1
“As for the analysis of the data, the researcher did not utilizing predetermined analytic categories (e.g., Storch, 2002; Yu, 2014).”
Method
Gender, Scaffolding Mechanism and Output Complexity in Task-based Language Learning
Bahador, H., Zand-Moghadam, A., & Fanaie, M. (2016) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature · doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.1p.146 · Cited by 1
“Donato (1994) proposed the concept of “mutual scaffolding” to indicate that interaction among peers when performing tasks in small groups or pairs can be as effective as the interaction between the teacher and students (Barnard, 2002; Donato, 1994; Storch, 2002, 2005, 2007; Van Lier, 2004).”
Background
A Sociocultural Perspective into Intercultural Competence and Computer-Assisted Language Learning
Sahragard, R., & Meihami, H. (2016) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1882-2.ch008 · Cited by 1
Application of Interactive Autonomous Learning Mode to Teach College English Writing
Liu, J., & Li, X. (2017) · International Journal for Innovation Education and Research · doi:10.31686/ijier.vol5.iss5.702 · Cited by 1
“And other scholars (e.g., Donato, 1988; DiCamilla & Anton, 1997; Swain & Lapkin, 1998; Storch, 2002) begin to introduce this new method into L2 teaching and learning.”
Background
Social Dynamics During Peer Response: Patterns of Interaction in the L2PR Corpus
Friginal, E., Lee, J. J., Polat, B., & Roberson, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59900-7_12 · Cited by 1
Group dynamics in ESL collaborative academic writing
Yong, M. F. (2014) · Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) · Cited by 1
ENGAGEMENT WITH LANGUAGE: A POTENTIAL CONSTRUCT IN PEER INTERACTION RESEARCH
Hien, N. T. (2020) · VNU Journal of Foreign Studies · doi:10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4476 · Cited by 1
“Shima (2008) also found that both more proficient learners and less proficient learners receive benefits from peer assistance, and confirms the claim on the changeable nature of the expert and the novice made by Storch (2002).”
BackgroundInfluential
OCENA TELEKOLABORACYJNYCH PROJEKTÓW PISARSKICH REALIZOWANYCH NA PLATFORMACH SYNCHRONICZNYCH
Kotuła, K. (2020) · Neofilolog · doi:10.14746/n.2020.54.1.10 · Cited by 1
“Zagadnienie to dobrze ilustruje model zaproponowany przez Storch (2002).”
Background
Vocabulary Explanations and Second Language Development in Adult Beginning-Level ESOL Classroom Interaction: A Conversation Analysis Perspective
Tai, K. W. H. (2018) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.29205.37602/1 · Cited by 1
The impact of linguistic background on the nature of classroom dyadic interactions: evidence from L2 and L3 learners of English as a foreign language
Tavakol, M., Tavakoli, M., & Ketabi, S. (2021) · International Multilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/19313152.2021.1929761 · Cited by 1
“However, Storch (2002) noted that coding for patterns of interaction is by its very nature imprecise.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Communicators-Oriented Functions of Strategies
Jamshidnejad, A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-55057-8_12 · Cited by 1
Identifying Emergent Leaders in Small Groups in the Language Learning Classroom: An Exploratory Study
Leeming, P. (2021) · JALT Journal · doi:10.37546/jaltjj43.2-4 · Cited by 1
“I Have a Question”
Sağdıç, A., & Reagan, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.012 · Cited by 1
Pedagogical Perspectives
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108643689.011 · Cited by 1
Thai EFL Students' Perceptions of Collaborative Tasks in a Presentation Course
Anggoro, K. J., & Nurmala, N. (2022) · The Journal of AsiaTEFL · doi:10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.1.30.373 · Cited by 1
Exploring the Effects of Teaching Students Dynamic Assessment for Appropriation in Group Learner-Learner English Discussion
Brown, A. G. (2020) · International Journal of TESOL Studies · doi:10.46451/ijts.2020.06.07 · Cited by 1
“First, low occurrence of implicit fronted or graduated feedback appropriation aligns with previous findings on how limited background knowledge hinders a learner’s ability to apply feedback strategies reliably (Storch, 2002; Oskov, 2009).”
Influential
‘I’d rather you worked individually’: An autoethnographic enquiry
Enferad, R., Yaqubi, B., & Hassani, S. G. (2022) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688221110330 · Cited by 1
“As indicated, in those heterogeneous groups, it was evident to me that when some learners perceived themselves as being in higher levels of proficiency than their own group members, they were more likely to take the dominant role (Storch, 2002).”
Influential
Student Negotiation of Collaborative Dialogues: The Roles and Resources Used in Unsupervised Conversations
Groepper, E. (2022) · Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German · doi:10.1111/tger.12208 · Cited by 1
Escritura colaborativa en línea: Un estudio preliminar orientado al proceso
Alfonso, B. S., de Jesús, T. S. F., & Alejandro, M. D. G. (2007) · Cited by 1
Assessment for Learning in teaching English to Young Learners: teachers’ understanding, classroom practice and impact on interactions
Britton, A. (2015) · CentAUR (University of Reading) · Cited by 1
Analysing Learner Language ‐ By Rod Ellis and Gary Barkhuizen
Fortune, A. (2007) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00140.x · Cited by 1
Nonnatives' Perceptions of Group Work: a Study of Their Attitudes and Experiences in the Group Work Setting
Rodrigues, E. (2012) · doi:10.32597/theses/23/ · Cited by 1
“Most of the studies have been conducted based on Long’s Interaction Hypothesis (Storch, 2002).”
Method
A Review of “Task-based language learning and teaching: theoretical, methodological, and pedagogical perspectives”
Fortune, A. (2009) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658410802681129 · Cited by 1
The conceptualisation and implementation of the learner-centred approach to TESOL at tertiary level in Vietnam: a case study
Chu, T. L. H. (2014) · eSpace (Curtin University) · Cited by 1
Teaching discourse markers to EFL Primary Education students
Albanell, V. C. I. (2014) · Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) · Cited by 1
Languaging in cyberspace: a case study of the effects of peer-peer collaborative dialogue on the acquisition of English idioms in task-based synchronous computer-mediated communication
Teng, X. (2015) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · doi:10.31274/etd-180810-4484 · Cited by 2
“K, on the other hand, appeared to assume “a more passive, subservient role” (Storch, 2002, p. 129) by simply aligning herself with O through confirmations in several of her much shorter turns (e.g., lines 4, 10, 16, 22 “yep,” “yes,” “I think your answer is correct,” “yup”).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Design of an LMS-based English Language Learning Online Network Architecture based on User-Generated Content
Sagar, C. (2015) · Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · Cited by 1
Pair interaction among adult EFL learners: A South Korean case study
Kim, Y. (2016) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 1
The relationship between test-takers' first language, listening proficiency and their performance on paired speaking tests
Jaiyote, S. (2016) · University of Bedfordshire Repository (University of Bedfordshire) · Cited by 1
Peer response in college ESL writing classroom
Singto, S. (2005) · Cited by 1
An Investigation into, and Re-conceptualisation of, Second Language Learners' Metacognitive Awareness and Activity in the Listening Process
Huang, N. (2015) · ERA · Cited by 1
Task Development: Collaborative Writing
Kim, Y., & Chiesa, D. L. (2018) · The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching · doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0812 · Cited by 1
Investigating face-to-face and computer-mediated out-of-class collaboration in an English for Technical Writing course in Malaysia
Loo, S. M. (2019) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17135903.v1 · Cited by 1
Written languaging, learners’ aptitude and second language learning
Ishikawa, M. (2019) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 1
Editor's Column
(2002) · Journal of Basic Writing · doi:10.37514/jbw-j.2002.21.2.01 · Cited by 1
Teaching Grammar through Micro Collaborative Writing in EFL Classroom: Empowering Writing SkillsPreprint
Chuishbekov, D. (2022) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/8erfz · Cited by 1
From Negotiation to Creation: Examining the Patterns of Interaction and Collaborative Multimodal Writing Products in a French as a Foreign Language ContextPreprint
Akoto, M., & Li, M. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4641614 · Cited by 1
An investigation into English as a Second Language (ESL) learner participation in language learning opportunities : a social view
Zulkepli, N. (2012) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University) · Cited by 1
An Activity Theory Perspective on Academic Language Use by ELLs in a High School Math Classroom
Liu, K. K. (2014) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 1
The effect of input, repetition and metacognitive awareness on task performance in South Korean EFL classes
Manning, S. J. (2014) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17007418.v1

Authors: Storch, N.
Affiliations: The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author: Storch, Neomy
ORCID: Storch, Neomy
Venue: Language Learning
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2002-03
Volume: 52
Issue: 1
Pages: 119-158
ISSN: 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
1467-9922
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00179
OpenAlex: W2092002315
Cited by: 1,080
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 68 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 35
FWCI: 82.24
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 291 d)
Locations: Language Learning (publishedVersion)
Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
Keywords: dyadic interaction, pair work, ESL learners, adult language learners, interaction patterns, Vygotsky, cognitive development, classroom interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Patterns of Interaction in ESL Pair Work

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks