Cited by 1,080EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningEducational and Psychological Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Patterns of Interaction in ESL Pair Work

Storch, Neomy·2002·Language Learning

DOI 10.1111/1467-9922.00179

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigated the nature of dyadic interaction in an adult ESL classroom. The study was longitudinal, classroom based, and examined the nature of interaction between 10 pairs of adult ESL students over a range of language tasks and over time (a semester). Four distinct patterns of dyadic interaction were found. These patterns are distinguishable in terms of equality and mutuality (Damon & Phelps, 1989). More importantly, the findings suggest that certain patterns of dyadic interaction are more conducive than others to language learning. These findings are explained by reference to Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9922.00179

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 999

Comparative Method Studies
Ellis, R. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118271643.ch3
Task types and learners’ performance in collaborative virtual learning environments
Rahimi, A., & Yadollahi, H. (2015) · The New English Teacher
Characteristics of Interactional Management Functions in Group Oral by Japanese Learners of English
Negishi, J. (2010) · Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics
Two Heads May Not Be Better than One in Writing to Learn Spanish as a Second Language
Tsai, Y.-C. (2013) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature · doi:10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.180
“Although sociocultural theory emphasizes the pedagogical value of TBLL, traditional approaches are not without value (Storch, 2002).”
Background
Assessing collaborative writing fairly and accurately
Wong, A. (2013) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)
The Influence of Modality Combinations on Communication in Collaborative Virtual Environments
Moll, J. (2013) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.33201.17766
The effects of synchronous text-based computer-mediated communication tasks on the development of L2 and academic literacy: A mixed methods study
Li, J. (2012) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · doi:10.31274/etd-180810-3043
“…proficiency level relative to one’s own (Lee, 2004), the perceived purpose of language use (Khamis, 2010; Liang, 2010; Peterson, 2009; Warner, 2004), the degree of engagement of group members (Oskoz, 2009; Storch, 2002), and the perceived relationships between interlocutors (Darhower, 2007).”
Background
Uncovering Peer Interactions as a Resource for Learning
Devos, N. J. (2015) · Educational linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22219-6_5
"Did I say that?" Contextual influences on oral language task performance
Moore, P. J. (2009)
Broadening the focus of evaluation: An experiment
Chakraborty, S., & Agarwal, S. (2010) · International journal of business science & applied management. · doi:10.69864/ijbsam.5-1.47
“Important conditions in group tasks are that group members must be encouraged to (i) share; (ii) jointly analyze and evaluate the ideas; (iii) come to a joint solution of the problem; and (iv) share the ownership of a product (Mercer, 1995; Storch, 2002).”
Background
Effects of collaborative writing in weblogs
김재경 (2009) · Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.15702/mall.2009.12.2.135
Effects of Role Assignment and Proficiency Difference in Low Level Learners’ Pair Interaction in English
heeLee, J., & HwaLee, J. (2013) · English Teaching · doi:10.15858/engtea.68.4.201312.193
‘I think’ as an Interactional Resource during Discussions in Collaborative Writing Tasks
Sharma, B. K. (2009) · ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Transcription as an Initiator of Noticing Language Form and Use: An EFL Longitudinal Study
So, M. (2015) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
La escritura y corrección de textos en una tutoría entre iguales, recíproca y virtual, para la mejora en inglés y español Writing and correcting text through reciprocal and virtual peer tutoring, for improving English and Spanish
Blanch, S., Corcelles, M., & Durán, D. (2014)
Task Complexity, Task Type, and Learner-learner Interaction: A Replication Study with Adult ESL Learners
Riccardi, D. (2014) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Book Review: Classroom-based Language Assessment
Hill, K. (2014) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/0265532214529704
“They found the quality of the interaction in the paired format depended on dyad type (Storch, 2002) and that teachers did little to regulate asymmetric interactions.”
Background
The Effects of Lexical Assistance on Korean EFL Learners’ Focus on Morphosyntax During a Synchronous Text-Based CMC Task
박수정 (2011) · English Teaching · doi:10.15858/engtea.66.3.201109.149
Collaborative Writing and Individual Writing: Improving Writing in an L2 Class
Vithanage, R. I. (2013) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
The Effects of Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Scaffolding on University Students’ Grammar Learning
Izanlu, M., & Farangi, M. R. (2015) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
The Effect of Mixed and Matched Level Dyadic Interaction on Iranian EFL Learners’ Comprehension and Production of Requests and Apologies
Ajabshir, Z. F., Vahdany, F., Jafarigohar, M., & Soleımanı, H. (2016) · Journal of teaching language skills · doi:10.22099/jtls.2016.3728
“A longitudinal study by Storch (2002) came up with the patterns of interaction more conducive to language learning.”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Offline Peer Dialogue in Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication Activities for L2 Teacher Development
Kitade, K. (2014) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6174-5.ch006
Interaction Patterns in Joint Editing Output Tasks and the Learning Outcomes
Hwang, J. (2010) · The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature · doi:10.18853/jjell.2010.52.1.023
Factors Affecting the Choice of Communication Strategies in Interaction of EFL College Learners
박은경, & UhmChuljoo (2014) · The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature · doi:10.18853/jjell.2014.56.2.004
The Effect of Language Ability and Attitude Differences on EFL Students’ Cooperative Group Work
Kim, S.-A. (2014) · Journal of the Korea English Education Society · doi:10.18649/jkees.2014.13.3.1
Effects of Pair Types on English Vocabulary Acquisition
Jang, Y.-S. (2016) · The Journal of the Korea Contents Association · doi:10.5392/jkca.2016.16.08.332
Comprehending the Learning Process of Peer-Feedback Activities of EFL Learners with Autism in Different Settings in Indonesia
Putera, A. A., Latief, M. A., Saukah, A., & Rachmajanti, S. (2016) · Studies in English Language Teaching · doi:10.22158/selt.v4n4p623
“…observation and further discourse analysis has witnessed five cooperation patterns, represented by five patterns of interaction, among which four patterns of interaction are similar to those by Storch (2002): collaborative, expert-novice, dominant-passive, dominant-dominant, and passive-passive.”
Background
The Effects of Academically Productive Talk in Group Discourse in a Virtual Internship for Engineering
Hartung, K. J. (2016) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)
Discursive leadership and conceptual fluency in non-native English speakers' online task-based dialogues
Boz, U. (2014) · doi:10.54014/e0n5-95nd
An investigation into the frequency of Language Related Episodes in the EFL learners’ Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Dyadic Interaction
Ghafoori, N. (2015) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Effects of Dictogloss on Korean Middle School Students' English Listening Ability and Attitude, Depending on Different Genres
장은혜, & Kim, E. (2012) · 교과교육학연구 · doi:10.24231/rici.2012.16.4.1021
The Effect of Elaborated and Limited noticing in a Pair Work Activity of Korean language
정대현 (2012) · korean language education research · doi:10.20880/kler.2012..45.451
„Danke für eure Tipps!“
Sablotny, M. (2017) · Informationen Deutsch als Fremdsprache · doi:10.1515/infodaf-2017-0004
The Invention of Transformative Agency: Collaborative Inquiry as Graduate-Level Mentoring
Bommarito, D. V. (2015)
Interactive peer-based learning in a comparative case study : what do students gain?
Ashton-Hay, S. A. (2011) · QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)
Book Review: The Co-construction of Conversation in Group Oral Tests
Lim, G. S. (2016) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/0265532215576836
Understanding Learner Talk About Writing: The Second Language Peer Response (L2PR) Corpus
Friginal, E., Lee, J. J., Polat, B., & Roberson, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59900-7_11
Linguistic Features of Collaboration in Peer Response: Modal Verbs as Stance Markers
Friginal, E., Lee, J. J., Polat, B., & Roberson, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59900-7_13
Collaborative Writing in Individuals, Pairs, and Small Groups: A Classroom-based Study
Li, Y. (2017) · International Conference on Arts, Design and Contemporary Education (ICADCE) · doi:10.2991/icadce-17.2017.206
“With the mediation of the construction of linguistic knowledge, collaborative work contributes to L2 learning as a result (Ohta, 2001; Storch, 2002; Swain, 1998, 2000, 2010; Swain et al, 2009).”
Background
Conflict Resolution Strategies Observed During Discussions among Students with Different Personalities
Lin, S. F. (2017) · Global Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.5296/gjes.v3i2.11746
Investigating Dynamic Writing Assessment in a Web 2.0 Asynchronous Collaborative Computer-Mediated Context
Zafarani, Z., & Maftoon, P. (2016) · Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.29252/ijal.19.2.195
“The instructor and the second rater had three discussion sessions on Storch’s patterns of interaction, her concept of mutuality and equality, and the coding scheme used in Storch (2002a, 2013) and Zheng (2012) studies which were also used in the present study.”
Influential
Collaborative Dialogues of Korean High School EFL Learners in Pair Writing
이진영 (2015) · Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University)
Examining World Language Teachers' Maximized Target Language Use In The Teaching Of Novice Learners
Bonafede, M. D., & Monica, V. M. (2018)
The role of task repetition in L2 acquisition
Borruel, G., & María, C. (2017)
How EFL College Learners Perceive CBI Experience
Kang, A. (2018) · English Teaching · doi:10.15858/engtea.73.4.201812.73
“as ‘collective scaffolding’ (Donato, 1994; Storch, 2002) contributing to increasing the target-skills which may be language using abilities (Long, 1985, 1996).”
Background
Los efectos de utilizar un enfoque basado en proceso, trabajo colaborativo, portafolio, y retroalimentación variada en un curso de escritura académica.
Mosquera, J. M. (2012) · USFQ Digital Repository (Universidad San Francisco de Quito)
Pretask modelling: Encouraging learning opportunities in collaborative tasks
Gómez, J. G. (2017) · Communities in ADDI (Universidad del Pais Vasco)
A Case Study on Anxiety of University English Teachers as Visiting Scholars in Their Collaborative Learning
Li, C. (2019) · Journal of literature and art studies · doi:10.17265/2159-5836/2019.01.008
“DAVID PUBLISHING D view by reference to Vygosky’s theory of cognitive development (Watanabe & Swain, 2007; Storch, 2002, 2009).”
Method
The First Language (L1) as a Mediational Tool in Peer Interaction by EFL College Students in Vietnam
Linh, V. T. K. (2019) · HUE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES · doi:10.26459/hueuni-jssh.v128i6b.4764 · Cited by 3
Assessing Interactional Competence of Advanced-Level Korean EFL Students Through L2 Paired Discussion Tasks
박희민 (2017) · Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University)
Using Languaging In ESL Vocabulary Acquisition: The Insights of ESL Learners and Practitioner
Zakaria, Z. A., Maarof, N., & Yamat, H. (2018) · Ulum Islamiyyah · doi:10.33102/uij.vol23no0.19
PROPAGANDAS- UMA PROPOSTA PEDAGÓGICA DOS MULTILETRAMENTOS
Tonin, J. P. (2018) · doi:10.29327/ixseles.a1
Study on Peer Scaffolding in English-majored Group Interaction in Private College
Lang, S. (2018) · International Social Sciences and Education Conference (ISSEC) · doi:10.25236/issec.2018.049
“Storch (2002) identified four basic patterns in interaction: Collaborative, Dominant/ Dominant, Dominant/ passive and Expert/Novice.”
Background
Two old women: culturally relevant literature discussions in the 4th grade
Starr, G. B. (2019) · ScholarWorks - UA (University of Alaska System)
INTERACTION FEATURES IN PREDICTING COMMON EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK OF REFERENCE LEVEL
Kang, O., Larson, G. M., & Koo, S.-H. (2019) · Journal of Language Testing & Assessment · doi:10.23977/langta.2019.21001
“Perhaps, one of the most well-known studies about interaction features would be Storch (2001, 2002), even though the patterns were described for ESL writing papers: collaborative, dominant/passive, expert/novice, and dominant/dominant.”
Background
El uso de Ocw y Wikis como herramienta colaborativa para la traducción especializada
Martínez, N. M. (2019) · CIC Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación · doi:10.5209/ciyc.64665
Peer Interaction In An Efl Context: Task Variety, Proficiency Level And Awareness Of Learners
Azer, S. (2019) · i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching · doi:10.26634/jelt.9.4.16091
The timing of explicit form-focused instruction and its impact on task outcomes
Hawkes, M. (2018) · Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) · doi:10.48780/publications.aston.ac.uk.00039074
Student Group Interaction Patterns and Teacher-led Interaction during Storybook-based Grammar Learning in a Korean Middle School EFL Classroom
손가영 (2019) · Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University)
Exploration of Think-Pair-Share Varieties of Reading Comprehension
Naksathit, P., & Kewara, P. (2020) · doi:10.7176/jep/11-6-27
“This related to the results of Storch (2002) who clarified that the member in each pair works equally to accomplish the task but they have less engagement in each pair.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Responding to the Critics of Task-Based Language Teaching
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108643689.019
Talking about language
Gánem‐Gutiérrez, G. A., & Roehr‐Brackin, K. (2020) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.55.08gan
Languaging
Yang, L. (2020) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.55.06yan
Efficacy of genre-based writing instruction and learner collaboration : a study of tertiary EFL learners
Baimani, S. A. (2019) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
The Parameters of Collaborative Dialogue: Interaction Patterns, Use of L1 and Language-Related Episodes
Aydın, B., & AYDIN, E. (2020) · Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.31464/jlere.777592
“As an influential study in this respect, Storch (2002), based on a longitudinal classroom-based research, observed four types of interaction patterns emerging in collaborative dialogue between ESL learners as seen in Figure 1 below: Patterns of interaction in ELS pair work.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
The meaning-making potential of collaborative L2 writing at tertiary level
Saller, M. (2020) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.56.12sal
Group versus Individual : Motivational Drivers in the EDC Learning Context
McLaughlin, M. J. (2017) · Rikkyo University academic repository (Rikko Roots) (Rikkyo University)
Iranian EFL Learners’ Interactional Competence in Paired Speaking Tasks: An Account of Task Type Variability
Jafarigohar, M., Rouhi, A., & Kazerooni, S. R. (2020) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.30479/jmrels.2020.13807.1695
Learning English in a community of practice: A case study
Özbay, E. (2014)
Introducing interactive speaking tasks to improve the construct coverage of a test: A welcome change for test users?
Sobejko, M. (2020) · Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego eBooks · doi:10.31338/uw.9788323546917.pp.129-144
Local and international prospective teachers’ perception on collaborative learning
Waloyo, A. A., Prastiyowati, S., & Rumalessin, U. A. T. (2020) · Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi Guru · doi:10.22219/jppg.v1i2.12477
“This pattern of groupwork was also found in previous study by Storch (2002).”
Result
Understanding academic writing practices in Malaysian university classrooms
Mat, N. H. C. (2020) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia)
Interaction patterns and support for learning in the primary foreign language classroom
Leslie, C. (2021) · Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras · doi:10.30827/portalin.v0i36.15712
“Studies with adult learners have shown that expert/novice or collaborative interaction patterns are more beneficial to learning (Storch, 2002), and results in the present study would appear to corroborate this, with greater mutuality leading to greater support for language production.”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Developing a genre-based pedagogy for the Chinese University students’ persuasive writing in english: a systemic functional approach to teaching
Chen, F. (2021)
Shimo-based collaborative argumentative writing: Do grouping patterns matter?
Su, F., & Zou, D. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt52272.2021.00087
Investigating Task-Based Programmes
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108643689.015
Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde istasyon rotasyon modelinin uygulanmasına yönelik tasarım ve taslak örneği
Khalmatova, Z. (2021) · Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi · doi:10.31795/baunsobed.940728
Tinkering Toward WAC Utopia
Cohen, S. (2002) · Journal of Basic Writing · doi:10.37514/jbw-j.2002.21.2.05
A Virtual Approach to Communication: Augmented Reality and Language Related Episodes in Second Language Learning
Domaz, S. (2020)
The Formation of a Foreign Language Professionally-Oriented Competence among Students of Technical Specialties in the Chinese Language
Seitova, G., Kunakova, K. U., & Yakunina, T. I. (2021) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Mehrsprachige Repertoires in kollaborativen Schreibinteraktionen
Stierwald, M. (2022) · doi:10.21248/gups.65745
A Review of Interactional Competence Assessment in the Saudi EFL Context
AlQahtani, N. A. (2021) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v11n6p28
“Interactional patterns were defined in English as a second language (ESL) written discourse as collaborative, dominant/passive, expert/novice, and dominant/dominant (Storch, 2002).”
Background
Relay Writing Tasks in the EFL Classroom: When Second Language Learning Encounters Collaborative Interactions
Fang, H. (2021) · English Language Literature & Culture · doi:10.11648/j.ellc.20210604.11
Delivering Task-Based Language Teaching at Scale
Nielson, K. B. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.020
Designing a Classroom-Based Task-Based Language Assessment Framework for Primary Schools
Gorp, K. V. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.033
Developing a Task-Based Approach
Oliver, R. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.006
Examining High-School Learners’ Experience of Task Motivation and Difficulty in a Two-Week Spanish Immersion Camp
Gurzynski‐Weiss, L., Giacomino, L., & Jarrett, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.032
Blustery with an Occasional Downpour
Maie, R., & Salen, B. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.011
Task-Based Language Teaching and Indigenous Language Revitalisation
Riestenberg, K. J., & Sherris, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.021
Task-Based Language Teaching in a Japanese University
Lambert, C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.008
Training for Tasks the Cooperative Way
McMillan, N., & Jordan, G. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.028
Synchronous computer-mediated communication between foreign language learners and prospective teachers
Şahin, M. (2007) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · doi:10.31274/rtd-180813-16718
“The interaction pattern between prospective teachers and language learners fell into the fourth quadrant in the model of dyadic interaction proposed by Storch (2002).”
BackgroundInfluential
Early-stage french as a foreign language in Taiwan : a case study involving L2 oral proficiency, motivation and social presence in synchronous computer mediated communication (CMC)
Ko, C.-J. (2010) · ERA
Index
Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Feick, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108869812.012
Preface
Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Feick, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108869812.001
Conclusion
Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Feick, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108869812.009
Jessica’s snake game
Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Feick, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108869812.010
Input: Creating a Language-Rich Learning Environment
Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Feick, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108869812.004
A Place for Practice in the Language Classroom
Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Feick, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108869812.007
Index
Ahmadian, M. J., & Long, M. H. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.038

Authors: Storch, N.
Affiliations: The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author: Storch, Neomy
ORCID: Storch, Neomy
Venue: Language Learning
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2002-03
Volume: 52
Issue: 1
Pages: 119-158
ISSN: 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
1467-9922
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00179
OpenAlex: W2092002315
Cited by: 1,080
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 68 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 35
FWCI: 82.24
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 291 d)
Locations: Language Learning (publishedVersion)
Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
Keywords: dyadic interaction, pair work, ESL learners, adult language learners, interaction patterns, Vygotsky, cognitive development, classroom interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Patterns of Interaction in ESL Pair Work

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks