Cited by 1,851Statistical Methods and InferenceStatistical Methods and ApplicationsForecasting Techniques and Applications

A Reality Check for Data Snooping

White, Halbert·2000·Econometrica

Abstract

Data snooping occurs when a given set of data is used more than once for purposes of inference or model selection. When such data reuse occurs, there is always the possibility that any satisfactory results obtained may simply be due to chance rather than to any merit inherent in the method yielding the results. This problem is practically unavoidable in the analysis of time-series data, as typically only a single history measuring a given phenomenon of interest is available for analysis. It is widely acknowledged by empirical researchers that data snooping is a dangerous practice to be avoided, but in fact it is endemic. The main problem has been a lack of sufficiently simple practical methods capable of assessing the potential dangers of data snooping in a given situation. Our purpose here is to provide such methods by specifying a straightforward procedure for testing the null hypothesis that the best model encountered in a specification search has no predictive superiority over a given benchmark model. This permits data snooping to be undertaken with some degree of confidence that one will not mistake results that could have been generated by chance for genuinely good results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1468-0262.00152

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, H.
Affiliations
University of California System (US)
Corresponding author
White, Halbert
Venue
Econometrica
Published
2000-09
Volume
68
Issue
5
Pages
1097-1126
ISSN
  • 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0262
OpenAlex
W2135606128
Cited by
1,851
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 113 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 108 · 2016: 88 · 2015: 124 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 101
FWCI
33.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Econometrica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Keywords
data snooping, data reuse, model selection, specification search, time series forecasting, benchmark models, null hypothesis testing, overfitting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review