Profitability and Data-Snooping Tests of Four Technical Trade Strategies for Cryptocurrency Pair BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT in Cryptocurrency Markets During 2022–2023
Open accessAbstract
We provide a comprehensive investigation into the profitability of technical trading methods applied to the cryptocurrency pairs BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT. By employing rigorous evaluations and incremental examinations, we address the pervasive issue of data-snooping bias that often plagues the evaluation of trading strategies. Our empirical results indicate the lack of profitable technical trading strategies in both the analysis sample and prediction sample periods, even after rigorous adjustments for data snooping. These findings highlight the difficulties associated with selecting profitable technical trading strategies in the dynamic and volatile cryptocurrency market. Market participants, including individual traders, institutional investors, and regulatory bodies, should take note of our findings when making investment decisions based on technical analysis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 3 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Finding
The paper finds no profitable technical trading strategies in the examined sample and prediction periods after adjusting for data snooping.
“Our empirical results indicate the lack of profitable technical trading strategies in both the analysis sample and prediction sample periods, even after rigorous adjustments for data snooping.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
For ETH/USDT, the MACD strategy fails to generate profits in both the in-sample and out-of-sample periods.
“This optimal strategy yields an annualized return of -24.076%, a Sharpe ratio of -0.413, and a maximum drawdown of 71.128%.The strategy does not have outstanding performance in the in-sample period as its average annualized return is insignificant and can not reject the null hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
For BTC/USDT, the MACD strategy fails to generate profits in both the in-sample and out-of-sample periods.
“The strategy fails to generate profits in both the in-sample and out-of-sample periods, indicating a lack of effectiveness in the approach.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
For ETH/USDT, the RSI strategy proves ineffective in generating profits in both periods.
“Ultimately, the strategy proves ineffective in generating profits within the organization and outside the office, suggesting a lack of effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
For BTC/USDT, the Bollinger Bands strategy fails to generate profits in both the in-sample and out-of-sample periods.
“However, this strategy did not demonstrate exceptional performance in both the in-sample and out-of-sample periods, as its average annualized return was insignificant and it failed to reject the null hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified
- Finding
The authors conclude that their results support the efficient market hypothesis for cryptocurrency markets.
“Consequently, the primary contribution of this research is its support for the efficient market hypothesis within the cryptocurrency market.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
For BTC/USDT, the RSI strategy fails to generate profits in both the in-sample and out-of-sample periods.
“Therefore, we can conclude that the RSI approach failed to generate profits in both the in-sample and out-of-sample periods, suggesting its lack of effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
For ETH/USDT, the Bollinger Bands strategy does not generate substantial profits in either the in-sample or out-of-sample periods.
“These findings indicate a lack of”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
The authors say the profitability they observe is largely driven by parameter selection rather than by market inefficiency.
“The study further emphasizes that the observed profitability of technical trading strategies is highly dependent on the selection of specific parameters rather than indicating the existence of market inefficiencies.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Method
The paper applies White's reality check and a stepwise test to address multiple testing and data snooping.
“We utilize the bootstrap reality check implementation, which was introduced by White (2000), to compute the p-value for the reality check”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites White (2000) source
- Method
The authors divide the sample at January 2023 to reduce data-snooping bias.
“To mitigate the data-snooping bias, we employ a cutoff date of January 2023.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Method
The paper evaluates profitability with annualized return and Sharpe ratio.
“Table 2 presents the test results considering the whole sample period.The left and right panels are based on annualized return and Sharpe ratio as performance criteria, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Method
The paper also uses maximum drawdown as a risk measure in its performance tables.
“In the panel titled "Best Strategy (In-Sample)", we enumerate the depiction, annualized profit, Sharpe ratio, maximum drawdown, and the p-values of the nominal, actual inquiry assessment, and gradual inquiry assessment for the most superior approach in-sample.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Background
The paper states that under weak-form market efficiency, technical analysis is unnecessary because prices already reflect all past transaction records.
“In a weakform efficient market, technical analysis is unnecessary as current security prices fully reflect all past transaction records, including both valuation and volume.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Method
The paper investigates whether technical trading strategies can be profitable for BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT over January 2022 to June 2023.
“In this paper, we utilize comprehensive data on the cryptocurrency pair BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT, spanning from January 2022 to June 2023, to investigate the profitability of various technical trading strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Background
The paper describes technical analysis as using historical price and volume information rather than fundamental factors.
“This methodology solely focuses on a thorough examination of historical price patterns and statistical information, disregarding the potential impact of fundamental factors that influence the asset's value.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Method
The paper uses stationary bootstrap resampling from Politis and Romano in its reality-check procedure.
“We resample G using the stationary bootstrap method of Politis and Romano (1994), with prespecified parameter set X, for B times, and label each resample as G b , b = 1, ⋯ , B.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites Politis and Romano (1994) source
- Method
The study uses Binance as the source of cryptocurrency trading data.
“In this study, we sourced our trading data from the highly reputable cryptocurrency data source, Binance.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Background
The paper notes that prior studies found evidence that some technical trading rules can be profitable in cryptocurrency markets.
“Detzel et al. (2019) provides evidence that trading strategies based on mean oscillations generate profits for Bitcoin.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites Detzel et al. (2019)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Method
The study tests technical trading methods with different indicators and time resolutions.
“We employ different indicator selections and time resolutions to develop a range of technical trading methodologies.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Method
The dataset includes daily and hourly trading data for Bitcoin and Ethereum.
“Our dataset incorporates a wide range of granular information, capturing both daily and hourly trading data.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Adjusted out-of-sample profit contradicts the paper's central conclusion
MajorThe abstract says no profitable strategies were found in the prediction period after data-snooping adjustments. Table 6 instead reports a 102.083% out-of-sample annualized return for a BTC/USDT MACD strategy, with reality-check and stepwise p-values below the stated 5% threshold.
“Our empirical results indicate the lack of profitable technical trading strategies in both the analysis sample and prediction sample periods, even after rigorous adjustments for data snooping.”
“Performance of the Best Strategy (Out-of-Sample) Annualized Return 102.083% 45.594% 102.083% 45.594% Sharpe Ratio 2.467 1.157 2.467 1.157 Max Drawdown 9.169% 15.884% 9.169% 15.884% P-Value (Nominal) 0.051 0.431 0.000 0.000 P-Value (Reality Check) 0.040 0.560 0.000 0.004 P-Value (Stepwise Check) 0.041 0.558 0.000 0.004”
Whole-sample profitable count conflicts with the best strategy's adjusted test
MajorIn Table 2's daily Sharpe-ratio column, the best strategy has a stepwise p-value of 0.939, above the paper's 5% threshold. Yet that column reports an average of 2.928 profitable strategies under the same performance criterion.
“P-Value (Stepwise Check) 0.857 0.867 0.939 0.525”
“All Profitable Strategies (500 Tests) Minimum Number 0 0 2 0 Maximum Number 0 0 4 0 Average Number 0.000 0.000 2.928 0.000”
Moving-average crossover direction reverses within the methods
MinorThe introductory EMAC description labels a short average crossing below a longer one as an upward disruption. Its later double-moving-average rule instead goes short when the short average moves below the long average.
“By using a shorter moving average, traders can identify potential upward disruptions in the trend when it crosses below a longer moving average.Conversely, a downward disruption in the trend is indicated when the short moving average crosses above the longer moving average.”
“If MAt(p) moves down at least x percent below MAt(q) and remains so for d days, go short the asset until MAt(p) moves up at least x percent above MAt(q) and remains so for d days, at which time go long the asset.p is less than q.”
MACD parameter grid does not explain the reported 12 variants
MinorThe specified ranges give three fast lengths, three slow lengths, and four signal lengths: 36 combinations before applying the paper's fast-less-than-slow condition, or 32 after it. Table 6 reports 12 strategies.
“we examine the fast length values ranging from 10 to 20, considering a step size of 5. Furthermore, we extend our analysis to the slow length, examining values between 20 and 30 using a step size of 5. We also analyze the signal length, examining values from 6 to 12 with increments of 2.”
“TABLE 6 THE IN-/OUT-OF-SAMPLE PERIOD PERFORMANCE OF TECHNICAL TRADE STRATEGIES WITH MACD STRATEGIES -BTC/USDT Performance Metric Annualized Return Sharpe Ratio (1) (2) (3) (4) Time Resolution 1d 1h 1d 1h Number of Strategies 12 12 12 12”
Bollinger Bands grid specifies more variants than reported
MinorPeriods 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, and 30 combined with three stated devfactor values yield 18 configurations. Table 5 reports 15 strategies.
“spanning from a minimum of 15 to a maximum of 30, with a consistent and precise step size of 3.This diligent exploration intends to encompass and capture a comprehensive understanding of the strategy's performance across different time horizons.Additionally, attention will be given to examining the devfactor, where a distinct set of values, specifically 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0, will be evaluated.”
“TABLE 5 THE IN-/OUT-OF-SAMPLE PERIOD PERFORMANCE OF TECHNICAL TRADE STRATEGIES WITH BOLLINGER BANDS STRATEGIES -BTC/USDT Performance Metric Annualized Return Sharpe Ratio (1) (2) (3) (4) Time Resolution 1d 1h 1d 1h Number of Strategies 15 15 15 15”
Cites
EFFICIENT CAPITAL MARKETS: A REVIEW OF THEORY AND EMPIRICAL WORK*
Malkiel, B. G., & Fama, E. F. (1970) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x · Cited by 15,733 · see citing works
Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work
Fama, E. F. (1970) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2325486 · Cited by 13,635 · see citing works
Politis, D. N., & Romano, J. P. (1994) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1994.10476870 · Cited by 2,649 · see citing works
A Reality Check for Data Snooping
White, H. (2000) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00152 · Cited by 1,851 · see citing works
A Test for Superior Predictive Ability
Hansen, P. R. (2005) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1198/073500105000000063 · Cited by 1,230 · see citing works
Stepwise Multiple Testing as Formalized Data Snooping
Romano, J. P., & Wolf, M. (2005) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00615.x · Cited by 1,019 · see citing works
Forecasting the equity risk premium: the role of technical indicators
Neely, C. J., Rapach, D. E., Tu, J., & Zhou, G. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1838 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems
Wilder, J. (1978) · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Tests of Technical Trading Strategies in the Emerging Equity Markets of Latin America and Asia
Ratner, M., & Leal, R. P. C. (1999) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/s0378-4266(99)00042-4 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
RELATIVE STRENGTH AS A CRITERION FOR INVESTMENT SELECTION
Levy, R. A. (1967) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1967.tb00295.x · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Forecasting the Equity Risk Premium: The Role of Technical IndicatorsPreprint
Neely, C. J., Rapach, D. E., Tu, J., & Zhou, G. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1568267 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Hsu, P., Hsu, Y., & Kuan, C. (2010) · Journal of Empirical Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jempfin.2010.01.001 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Technical trading strategies and return predictability: NYSE
Kwon, K.-Y., & Kish, R. J. (2002) · Applied Financial Economics · doi:10.1080/09603100010016139 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
The Effectiveness of Technical Trading Rules in Cryptocurrency Markets
Corbet, S., Eraslan, V., Lucey, B. M., & Şensoy, A. (2019) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2019.04.027 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
A Test for Superior Predictive Ability
Hansen, P. R. (2004) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.264569 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Returns and volume: Frequency connectedness in cryptocurrency markets
Fousekis, P., & Tzaferi, D. (2020) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2020.11.013 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Relative Strength as a Criterion for Investment Selection
Levy, R. A. (1967) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2326004 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Regression Selection Strategies and Revealed Priors
Leamer, E. E. (1978) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1978.10480058 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Hsu, P., Hsu, Y., & Kuan, C. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1087044 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Forecasting the Equity Risk Premium: The Role of Technical IndicatorsPreprint
Neely, C. J., Rapach, D. E., Tu, J., & Zhou, G. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1787554 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Bitcoin: Predictability and Profitability via Technical Analysis
Detzel, A. L., Liu, H., Strauss, J., Zhou, G., & Zhu, Y. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3115846 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
The Effectiveness of Technical Trading Rules in Cryptocurrency MarketsPreprint
Corbet, S., Eraslan, V., Lucey, B. M., et al. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3454216 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Regression Selection Strategies and Revealed Priors
Leamer, E. E. (1978) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286604 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Thành, C. N., & Tam, P. H. (2018) · Journal of Insurance and Financial Management · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Amirzadeh, R., Thiruvady, D., Nazari, A., et al. (2025) · Annals of Data Science · doi:10.1007/s40745-025-00637-5 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Despite the attractiveness of the cryptocurrency market, several challenges a ff ect the profitability of cryptocurrency trading [70].”
BackgroundTian, H., Wei, W. C., Yang, M., & Yilmaz, A. (2024) · International Studies of Economics · doi:10.1002/ise3.87 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Li, W., Wang, X., Wang, Z., & Yang, M.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Venue
- Journal of Accounting and Finance
- Publisher
- North American Business Press
- Published
- 2023-10-13
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2158-3625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4387669589
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Accounting and Finance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Keywords
- technical trading, cryptocurrency market, data snooping bias, trading strategy profitability, Bitcoin, Ethereum, technical analysis, cryptocurrency trading
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read (extract-v2) on 2026-09-25.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review