The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study
Abstract
This paper reports experiments designed to measure strategic sophistication, the extent to which players' behavior reflects attempts to predict others' decisions, taking their incentives into account. Subjects played normal-form games with various patterns of iterated dominance and unique pure-strategy equilibria without dominance, using a computer interface that allowed them to look up hidden payoffs as often as desired, one at a time, while automatically recording their look-ups. Monitoring information search allows tests of game theory's implications for cognition as well as decisions, and subjects' deviations from search patterns suggested by equilibrium analysis help to predict their deviations from equilibrium decisions. * Harvard Business School ** University of Arizona
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173933 · Cited by 3,487
The psychology of human-computer interaction
Huesmann, L. R., Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1984) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422176 · Cited by 1,177
Cited by
Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking Study
Reutskaja, E., Nagel, R., Camerer, C. F., & Rangel, A. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.2.900 · Cited by 567
Lying for Strategic Advantage: Rational and Boundedly Rational Misrepresentation of Intentions
Crawford, V. P. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803321455197 · Cited by 391
Self-citationOvercommunication in strategic information transmission games
Cai, H., & Wang, J. T.-Y. (2006) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2005.04.001 · Cited by 370
Behavioural studies of strategic thinking in games
Camerer, C. F. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00094-9 · Cited by 304
The Cognitive Revolution and the Political Psychology of Elite Decision Making
Hafner-Burton, E. M., Hughes, D. A., & Victor, D. G. (2013) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592713001084 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Costa-Gomes, M., Crawford, V. P., & Broseta, B.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1193-1235
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0262
- OpenAlex
- W3122158347
- Cited by
- 813
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 74.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-0262.00239
- The paper
- Costa-Gomes, M., Crawford, V. P., & Broseta, B. (2001). Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
