The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Behavioural studies of strategic thinking in games
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355300555475 · Cited by 7,484
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.1.166 · Cited by 5,378
Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics
RABIN, M. (2011) · Advances in Behavioral Economics · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.15 · Cited by 4,705
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
The Handbook of experimental economics
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1645 · Cited by 3,679
Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.159 · Cited by 3,239
(2011) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_60360 · Cited by 2,855
In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & McElreath, R. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.73 · Cited by 2,614
Self-citation
Cited by
The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?
Friston, K. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2787 · Cited by 8,120
Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation
Friston, K. J., Daunizeau, J., Kilner, J., & Kiebel, S. J. (2010) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-010-0364-z · Cited by 866
“Watkins and Dayan 1992; Friston et al. 1994; Daw and Doya 2006),andinbehavioraleconomicsasexpectedutilitytheory ( Camerer 2003 ).”
BackgroundReinforcement learning or active inference?
Friston, K. J., Daunizeau, J., & Kiebel, S. J. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006421 · Cited by 443
The anatomy of choice: active inference and agency
Friston, K., Schwartenbeck, P., FitzGerald, T., Moutoussis, M., Behrens, T., & Dolan, R. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00598 · Cited by 340
Steinbeis, N., Bernhardt, B. C., & Singer, T. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.027 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Camerer, C. F.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 225-231
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140173765
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Behavioural studies of strategic thinking in games. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00094-9
- The paper
- Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioural studies of strategic thinking in games. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00094-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
